Effects of Myofascial Release and Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Pelvic Pain

Myofascial Trigger Point Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effects of Myofascial Release With and Without Electrical Stimulation on Pain and Functionality in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05851742
• Other study ID #: REC/RCR & AHS/23/0507
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 1, 2023
• Est. completion date: August 1, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: Riphah International University
• Contact: Imran Amjad, Phd
• Phone: 03324390125
• Email: imran.amjad[@]riphah.edu.pk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Myofascial pelvic pain (MFPP) caused by myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) is a major contributor to chronic pelvic pain in women.In females,pelvic pain is the single most common indication for referral to women's health services.Pelvic floor physical therapy with myofascial release improve mobility and reduce pain by releasing the painful trigger points.Tools that will be used,for pain numerical pain scale (NPS),functional pelvic pain scale(FPPS) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire-7 will be used to asses pain and functionality.

Description:

Myofascial pelvic pain (MFPP) caused by myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) is a major contributor to chronic pelvic pain in women. In females, pelvic pain ''is the single most common indication for referral to women's health services. Pelvic floor physical therapy with myofascial release improve mobility, and reduce pain by releasing the painful trigger points following restrictions in connective tissues that are related to pelvic floor.In this project we will observe effects of myofascial release with and without electrical stimulation on pain and functionality in women with chronic pelvic pain.It has been hypothesized that myofascial release along with electrical stimulation help in reducing pain and improve functionality in women.Patients will be having sessions for consecutive 4 weeks and will be exposed to both types of techniques to find out the effective results.

The study will be randomized control trial.For pain numerical pain scale (NPS),functional pelvic pain scale(FPPS) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire-7 will be used to asses pain and functionality respectively. A randomized control trial will be conducted on two groups. Group 1 will receive myofascial release with electrical stimulation in women with chronic pelvic pain for 4 weeks with 50-280 Hz frequency and a pulse duration of 50 µs for 10 minutes along with 10 minutes myofascial release..On the other hand Group 2 will receive myofascial release without electrical stimulation on pain and functionality in women with chronic pelvic pain. In previous studies there is ample amount of research conducted on chronic pelvic pain but there were very few recent studies available on myofascial release,so this relation of use of myofascial release with and without electrical stimulation on pain and functionality in chronic pelvic pain should also be carried out.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 24
• Est. completion date: August 1, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: July 1, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 25 Years to 45 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 25-40 years,

• Presence of persistent chronic pelvic pain

• >4 points on a 10 point numeric rating scale for atleast more than 3 months,

• Atleast 1 active MTrp in one of the muscle groups including the obturator internus,

• levator ani,piriformis and coccygeus on pelvic examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Prolapse of the pelvic organ,

• Pregnency,

• Fibromyalgia

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Pelvic Pain
• Myofascial Pain Syndromes
• Myofascial Trigger Point Pain
• Pelvic Pain

Intervention

Device:
• TENS
TENS 50-280 HZ frequency and a pulse duration of 50 us for 10 minutes along with 10 minutes myofascial release.

Other:
• Myofascial trigger point release
Release of trigger points

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Pakistan	Jinnah Hospital Lahore	Lahore	Punjab

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Riphah International University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Pakistan, 

References & Publications (18)

Ajimsha MS, Ismail LA, Al-Mudahka N, Majzoub A. Effectiveness of external myofascial mobilisation in the management of male chronic pelvic pain of muscle spastic type: A retrospective study. Arab J Urol. 2021 Jul 26;19(3):394-400. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1954414. eCollection 2021. — View Citation

Aredo JV, Heyrana KJ, Karp BI, Shah JP, Stratton P. Relating Chronic Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis to Signs of Sensitization and Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction. Semin Reprod Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):88-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597123. Epub 2017 Jan 3. — View Citation

Baltazar MCDV, Russo JAO, De Lucca V, Mitidieri AMS, da Silva APM, Gurian MBF, Poli-Neto OB, Rosa-E-Silva JC. Therapeutic ultrasound versus injection of local anesthetic in the treatment of women with chronic pelvic pain secondary to abdominal myofascial syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01910-y. — View Citation

Castro-Sanchez AM, Gil-Martinez E, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Lara-Palomo IC, Nastasia I, de Los Angeles Querol-Zaldivar M, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME. Manipulative therapy of sacral torsion versus myofascial release in patients clinically diagnosed posterior pelvic pain: a consort compliant randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2021 Nov;21(11):1890-1899. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 13. — View Citation

Cottrell AM, Schneider MP, Goonewardene S, Yuan Y, Baranowski AP, Engeler DS, Borovicka J, Dinis-Oliveira P, Elneil S, Hughes J, Messelink BJ, de C Williams AC. Benefits and Harms of Electrical Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):559-571. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Oct 19. — View Citation

Dal Farra F, Aquino A, Tarantino AG, Origo D. Effectiveness of Myofascial Manual Therapies in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Nov;33(11):2963-2976. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05173-x. Epub 2022 Apr 7. — View Citation

Fuentes-Marquez P, Cabrera-Martos I, Valenza MC. Physiotherapy interventions for patients with chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Dec;35(12):1131-1138. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1472687. Epub 2018 May 14. — View Citation

Grinberg K, Weissman-Fogel I, Lowenstein L, Abramov L, Granot M. How Does Myofascial Physical Therapy Attenuate Pain in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome? Pain Res Manag. 2019 Dec 12;2019:6091257. doi: 10.1155/2019/6091257. eCollection 2019. — View Citation

Halder GE, Scott L, Wyman A, Mora N, Miladinovic B, Bassaly R, Hoyte L. Botox combined with myofascial release physical therapy as a treatment for myofascial pelvic pain. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Mar;58(2):134-139. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.2.134. Epub 2017 Feb 1. — View Citation

Lewis GK, Chen AH, Craver EC, Crook JE, Carrubba AR. Trigger point injections followed by immediate myofascial release in the treatment of pelvic floor tension myalgia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1027-1035. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06880-y. Epub 2022 Dec 14. — View Citation

Mahran A, Baaklini G, Hassani D, Abolella HA, Safwat AS, Neudecker M, Hijaz AK, Mahajan ST, Siegel SW, El-Nashar SA. Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul;30(7):1023-1035. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03898-w. Epub 2019 Mar 14. — View Citation

Modarresi S, Lukacs MJ, Ghodrati M, Salim S, MacDermid JC, Walton DM; CATWAD Consortium Group. A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People With Neck Pain. Clin J Pain. 2021 Oct 26;38(2):132-148. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000999. — View Citation

Natarajan J, Ahmed T, Patil S, Mamsaang M, Kapadia R, Tailor Y, Shrikhande A. Pain and functionality improved when underlying neuromuscular dysfunction addressed in chronic pelvic pain patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Aug;40(6):1609-1615. doi: 10.1002/nau.24726. Epub 2021 Jun 3. — View Citation

Plavnik K, Tenaglia A, Hill C, Ahmed T, Shrikhande A. A Novel, Non-opioid Treatment for Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women with Previously Treated Endometriosis Utilizing Pelvic-Floor Musculature Trigger-Point Injections and Peripheral Nerve Hydrodissection. PM R. 2020 Jul;12(7):655-662. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12258. Epub 2019 Nov 15. — View Citation

Sharma N, Rekha K, Srinivasan JK. Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. J Midlife Health. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):36-39. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_60_16. — View Citation

Shrikhande A, Ullger C, Seko K, Patil S, Natarajan J, Tailor Y, Thompson-Chudy C. A physiatrist's understanding and application of the current literature on chronic pelvic pain: a narrative review. Pain Rep. 2021 Aug 30;6(3):e949. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000949. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct. — View Citation

Tam J, Loeb C, Grajower D, Kim J, Weissbart S. Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Mar 26;19(5):32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0783-2. — View Citation

Vural M. Pelvic pain rehabilitation. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov 4;64(4):291-299. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2018.3616. eCollection 2018 Dec. — View Citation

* Note: There are 18 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale)	Higher the numeric value is 10 and lower is 0.The patient is asked to make three pain ratings corresponding to current,best and worst pain experienced over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0(no pain)to 10(worst pain imaginable).The average of the 3 ratings was used to represent the patient's level of pain over the previous 24 hours.	4 weeks
Primary	FPPS (Functional Pelvic Pain Scale)	Patients score pelvic function on the FPPS form for 8 categories:Bladder,Bowel,Intercourse,Walking,Running,Lifting,Working,Sleeping.The patients rated each category from 0 to 4,with 0 for normal function and 4 for cannot function because of pain.Thus each patient was given a total pelvic function score between 0 and 32.	4 weeks
Primary	PFIQ-7 (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionaire)	The PFIQ-7 consists of 7-questions that need to be answered 3 times each considering symptoms related to the Bladder or urine,Bowel or rectum,Vagina or pelvis and their effects on function,social health and mental health in the past 3 months.The responses for each question range from "Not at all-Somewhat-Moderately-Quit a bit". To get scale scores,the mean of each of the 3 scales is individually calculated,which ranges from 0 to 3,this number is then multiplied by 100 and then divided by 3.The scale scores are then added together to get the total PFIQ-7 score,which ranges from 0 to 300.A lower score means there is a lesser effect on quality of life.	4 weeks