The Mechanism of Action of Chlormethine (CL) Gel in the Treatment of MF-CTCL Adult Patients — GR-CTCL_CL  

Mycosis Fungoides Clinical Trial

Official title: A Greek, Prospective Non-interventional Study Investigating the Effectiveness and the Mechanism of Action of Chlormethine (CL) Gel in the Treatment of MF-CTCL Adult Patients

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Chlormethine is a topical alkylating agent whose role in MF-CTCL has been extensively studied over the last 40 years. While its efficacy is well established, many safety concerns have been raised due to high rates of delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity to aqueous solutions that limit the prolonged use of chlormethine in clinical practice. It has been shown that complete response to topical chlormethine is associated with lower risk of disease progression. Accordingly, clinical data from the investigators' clinic confirm that chlormethine gel is a safe and effective treatment, which be used in early and advanced stages of cutaneous lymphomas. Based investigators' clinical and biological results , the investigators like to further investigate the change in the percentage as well as the profile of malignant and inflammatory cells by CyTOF analysis and further investigate the pathways (eg OX40, PDL1) involved in this process.

Clinical Trial Description

1. RATIONALE Chlormethine is a topical alkylating agent whose role in MF-CTCL has been extensively studied over the last 40 years. While its efficacy is well established, many safety concerns have been raised due to high rates of delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity to aqueous solutions that limit the prolonged use of chlormethine in clinical practice. It has been shown that complete response to topical chlormethine is associated with lower risk of disease progression. Accordingly, the clinical data confirm that chlormethine gel is a safe and effective treatment, which be used in early and advanced stages of cutaneous lymphomas. In a study of 23 patients with stage IA-IIB mycosis fungoides from investigators' center an overall response of 65.22% at 9 months of treatment with topical chlormethine was recorded. Moreover in a recent multicenter greek study that included 58 patients with stage IA-IIB mycosis fungoides an overall response rate of 80.8% at 9 months of treatment was achieved. In the same study better response in patients with patches in comparison to plaques or tumors was also depicted. Unfortunately, the occurrence of skin drug reactions was the leading cause of treatment discontinuation in studies evaluating chlormethine irrespective of drug formulation, negatively affecting the achievement of a therapeutic response. In investigators' study, severe dermatitis was one of the main causes of treatment discontinuation, occuring in 15.5% of patients.

Taper of application frequency (as per SmPC) and topical steroid use represent strategies allowing the management of dermatitis in order to maintain patients on CL gel treatment and prevent treatment discontinuation. The presence or severity of dermatitis in the study population was not associated with ORR, indicating that the development of dermatitis did not affect the likelihood of response. It has previously been suggested that dermatitis may be a prognostic indicator for clinical response. These data highlight the unmet need to explain the significance of dermatitis after topical chlomethine application and the immunological changes behind and how these affect the clinical response. Additionally by standardizing a CyTOF technique in CTCL samples from skin biopsies of CTCL patients, investigators established the methodology for identification and enumeration of different cells populations in situ and their interactions with tumor microenvironment. Investigators' preliminary data demonstrated that the evaluation of MF-CTCL patients' immune profile revealed differences in cell proportion pinpointing the heterogeneity that characterizes different stages of MF.

Based on investigators' clinical and biological results investigators would like to further examine the change in the percentage as well as the profile of malignant and inflammatory cells by CyTOF analysis and further investigate the pathways (eg OX40, PDL1) involved in this process.

2. STUDY DESIGN 2.1 Study Description The proposed study is a non-interventional, prospective (data collection), open-label, single-arm study. Data collection will be done prospectively. The management of patients will be done in the classic framework of the management of adult patients with MF-CTCL in principal investigator's university hospital.

3. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES (CLINICAL, BIOLOGICAL AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES - QUALITY OF LIFE) 3.1 Clinical objectives

3.1.1 Effectiveness of CL gel treatment in routine medical practice in MF patients by:

• Evaluation of clinical response by mSWAT

• Duration of response (defined as the interval from the time measurement criteria for CR and PR are first met until the first date that progressive disease is documented), time to next treatment (TNTT: defined as the time from the time the next treatment is recorded)

• Correlation between dermatitis occurrence and clinical response

• quality of life of the patients

• Chlormethine gel tube consumption

• safety and tolerability of the treatment with CL gel: frequency of skin side effects 3.2 Biological objectives For this part of the study the percentage change of malignant and inflammatory cells, profile of inflammatory (new and existing) and malignant cells in all MF patients treated with chlormethine gel (with or without dermatitis), cytokines and signaling pathways at a single cell level will be also measured.

3.2.1 Assessments Dermatitis occurrence (before any topical steroids application) Clinical response (at least score >50% improvement from baseline) At months 6 and 12

• Evaluation of the impact of chlormethine gel treatment on malignant and inflammatory cells

• Evaluation of the impact of chlormethine gel treatment exhibits on the profile of Th1/Th2 cytokines (ELISA)

• Evaluation of the impact that CL gel treatment exerts on the JAK/STAT, NF-κB AKT, MAP signaling pathways (Western Blotting) 3.3 Patient-Reported Outcomes - quality of life (SKINDEX-29) Quality of Life (QoL) change from Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Disease-Related Symptom Scales of the SKINDEX-29 at every visit.

3.4 Study Population MF patients treated with CL gel as monotherapy. Study design is presented in figure below.

This study will include 40 patients treated with CL gel as monotherapy.

Patients will discontinue study treatment permanently if the following condition is met:

• Patients are still unable to tolerate CL gel treatment at reduced frequency with co-administration of corticosteroids.

All patients will be assessed every month for the first three months, and every 3 months thereafter (at months 6, 9, 12), as per current clinical practice.

In case of dermatitis, the patient is encouraged to continue treatment with reduced frequency at every other day or every third day. Steroids will be used only if the reduced schedule is not sufficient. A temporary treatment interruption might occur for a period of 2 weeks and then treatment can be restarted.

3.5 Research objectives (detailed) Clinical, biological and patient quality of life 3.5.1 Clinical objective

• Effectiveness of CL gel treatment in routine medical practice in MF patients: Overall Response Rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a CR or PR (at least score >50% improvement from baseline), in all patients determined by mSWAT, within 12 months of the start of CL gel treatment.

• Duration of response (RD), time to next treatment (TNTT) in the framework of the trial

• safety and tolerability of the drug: Frequency of skin side effects with a focus on dermatitis, the time to occurrence and duration of dermatitis as well as the percentage of patients with dermatitis remaining on treatment at the end of the study

• Correlation between dermatitis occurrence and clinical response (ORR in patients experiencing or not dermatitis during treatment by chlormethine gel)

• quality of life of the patients (using Skindex-29 tool) receiving CL gel for at baseline and at the end of treatment

• Chlormethine gel tube consumption estimated from medical prescription and patients' statement 3.6 Biological objectives

For this part of the study the percentage change of malignant and inflammatory cells, profile of inflammatory (new and existing) and malignant cells in all MF patients treated with chlormethine gel (with or without dermatitis), cytokines and signaling pathways at a single cell level will be also measured at:

• Baseline

o Dermatitis occurrence (before any topical steroids application)

• Clinical response (at least score >50% improvement from baseline)

• At months 6 and 12

• Evaluation of the impact of chlormethine gel treatment on malignant and inflammatory cells using mass cytometry (CyTOF)

• Evaluation of the impact of chlormethine gel treatment exhibits on the profile of Th1/ Th2 cytokines (ELISA)

• Evaluation of the impact that CL gel treatment exerts on the JAK/STAT, NF-κB, AKT, MAP signalling pathways (western blot analysis)

Skin histology description, immunohistochemistry and PCR are used in clinical routine practice to assess malignant T cells and clonality.

The exploratory study will use both blood samples and skin biopsies taken as per routine management of the patients tests for the study of • CL gel mechanism of action (1)

• the pathophysiology of dermatitis after CL gel application (2)

We will correlate the above with the clinical effectiveness of CL gel treatment (3) as well as dermatitis occurrence and clinical response in MF patients (4).

More specifically

• the profile of malignant cells and inflammatory, by characterizing the immune cells deriving from single cell suspensions from biopsies and/or PBMCs by mass cytometry

The signaling pathways involved, such as JAK/STAT, NF-κB, AKT, MAP kinases by identifying the phosphorylation status of implicated proteins by Western blot analyses

3.7 Patient-Reported Outcomes - quality of life (SKINDEX-29) Definition: Quality of Life (QoL) change from Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Disease-Related Symptom Scales of the SKINDEX-29 at every visit.

The Skindex-29 is a skin disease-specific questionnaire that comprehensively assesses the effects of skin diseases on patient's quality of life. It was specifically developed to detect changes throughout time, as well as differences among patients with different skin diseases. The questionnaire covers areas considered crucial in an instrument designed to evaluate quality of life, such as: degree of symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and emotional status. The 29-item version is a refinement of a previous 61-item version. It was originally written in English and has already been translated and validated in other languages. The Skindex-29 inquiries about how often (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, All the time) during the previous four weeks the patient experienced the effect described in each item. Seven items address the Symptoms domain, ten items the Emotional domain, and twelve items the Functioning domain. All responses are transformed to a linear scale of 100 varying from 0 (no effect) to 100 (effect experienced all the time). Skindex scores are reported as three scale scores, corresponding to the three domains; a scale score is the average of a patient's responses to items in a given domain.

Five distinct categories for the Symptoms scale, and four for the Emotions and Functioning scales have been categorized as summarized in the table below:

Emotional Symptoms Functioning Very little <6 <4 <4 Mild 6-24.9 4-10.9 4-10.9 Moderate 25-49.9 11-25.9 11-32.9 Severe ≥50 26-49.9 ≥33 Extreme ≥50 ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Mycoses
• Mycosis Fungoides

• NCT number: NCT06421571
• Study type: Observational
• Source: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
• Status: Recruiting
• Start date: February 21, 2023
• Completion date: December 2025