Musculoskeletal Pain Among E-sport Athletes

Musculoskeletal Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

Musculoskeletal Pain Among E-sport Athletes

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03910517
• Other study ID #: Project E-sport
• Status: Completed
• Start date: March 27, 2019
• Est. completion date: April 26, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: May 2019
• Source: University College of Northern Denmark
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Background:

Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain and injuries are common in endurance sports where athletes are required to perform at high intensity for long periods of time. In the short term, MSK pain may significantly impair the athletes' performance, which can lead to unwanted time-off from practice and competitive tournaments. Previous studies found an association between training load, MSK pain and performance. These results indicate that an athlete may experience MSK pain or get injured from both too low and to high training loads.

Electronic sports (E-sports), also known as competitive gaming, is defined by Hamari and Sjöblom as "a form of sports where the primary aspects of the sport is facilitated by electronic systems; the input of players and teams as well as the output of the E-sports system are mediated by human-computer interference".

There are only few data on MSK pain in E-sports, however a small study with 65 participants found that 41% suffered from back or neck pain and more than 1 in 3 had pain related to the wrist. E-sports athletes have to perform for an extended period of time, similar to athletes from traditional endurance sport. As such, MSK pain in E-sports may be associated with training load like it is seen in other sports. Therefore, MSK pain in E-sports could be an unrecognised issue. To provide health professionals with and optimal starting point for managing these issues, there is a need for well-conducted studies on the prevalence of MSK pain among E-sports athletes. In addition, it is highly relevant to investigate if training loads related to E-sports and physical activity levels are different among athletes with MSK pain compared to athletes without MSK pain.

Aims:

The aims of this questionnaire-based cross-sectional study are to; I) investigate the prevalence of MSK pain in E-sports athletes, II) assess if training loads among athletes with MSK pain are different from athletes without MSK pain, III) investigate if physical activity levels among athletes with MSK pain are different from athletes without MSK pain and IIII) descriptively present data on participant characteristics, sleep patterns, physical activity levels and utilization of health professionals and pain medication in the study population.

Description:

Data analysis:

The prevalence of MSK pain within the study population will be presented in absolute numbers and as percentage values. To investigate if E-sport related training loads differ among athletes with and without MSK pain we will use total E-sport related training load (N hours spend on structured E-sport + N hours spend on unstructured E-sport). An independent sample t-test will be applied for this comparison if data are normally distributed. To assess if physical activity levels are different among athletes with and without MSK pain we will use the responses from the IPAQ short form. For this comparison we will use an independent sample t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Participant characteristics, distribution and number of MSK pain sites, utilization of health professionals and pain medicine, physical activity levels, training loads and sleep patterns will be presented descriptively. The data will be presented with means, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals. Non-parametric data will be presented with absolute numbers and as percentage values, medians and range.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 208
• Est. completion date: April 26, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: April 26, 2019
• Gender: All
• Age group: 15 Years to 35 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 15-35

• Engaged in E-sport at an educational institution, a community-based team or a pro-team.

• Participating in E-sport through a computer-based game.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not providing written informed consent prior to enrolment.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Musculoskeletal Pain

Intervention

Other:
• No intervention
No intervention

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Denmark	E-Sport clubs and/or team based in the community, at an educational institution or in a private organization i Denmark	Aalborg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University College of Northern Denmark

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

References & Publications (4)

DiFrancisco-Donoghue J, Balentine J, Schmidt G, Zwibel H. Managing the health of the eSport athlete: an integrated health management model. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Jan 10;5(1):e000467. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000467. eCollection 2019. — View Citation

Gabbett TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? Br J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;50(5):273-80. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095788. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Review. — View Citation

Johnston R, Cahalan R, O'Keeffe M, O'Sullivan K, Comyns T. The associations between training load and baseline characteristics on musculoskeletal injury and pain in endurance sport populations: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Sep;21(9):910-918. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 14. Review. — View Citation

Juho Hamari, Max Sjöblom, What is eSports and why do people watch it? Internet Res. 2017

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Use of pain medicine	Participants are asked if they use pain medicine (yes/no)	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Other	Use of pain medicine - type	Participants are asked which type of pain medicine they use	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Other	Use of pain medicine - frequency	Participants are asked how frequent they use pain medicine (Several times per day, one time per day, one time per week, one time per month, rarely, don't know)	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Other	Reason for using pain medicine	Self-reported reason for using pain medicine	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Other	Health-care utilization	Participants are asked if they have sought treatment for pain from a healthcare professional during the past 3 month.	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Primary	Prevalence of pain in the body during the previous week.	Participants are asked if they have experienced any pain in their body during the previous week (yes/no).	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Primary pain site: questionnaire	Participants are asked where in the body they experience their primary pain complaint (list: head, chest, stomach, back, neck, shoulder, upper arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, hand/fingers, hip/groin, thigh, knee, shinbone, ankle, and foot/toes).	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Other pain sites: questionnaire	Participants are asked if they experience pain at additional sites (List: head, chest, stomach, back, neck. Also shoulder, upper arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, hand/fingers, hip/groin, thigh, knee, shinbone, ankle, and foot/toes with the response categories being right, left or both).	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Pain frequency	Responses are presented on a 5-point Likert scale: daily, weekly, several times per week, monthly, rarely	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Pain intensity: numeric pain rating scale	Participants are asked about worst pain during the previous week in relation to their primary pain site. Pain intensity is assessed with a 0 to 10 point numeric pain rating scale (0=no pain; 10= worst possible pain)	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Pain interference	Participants are asked if their pain interference with their participation in E-sport (yes/no).	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Eye fatigue	Participants are asked if they experience eye fatigue related to E-sport (yes/no).	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Training load (structured E-sport)	Participants are asked about the number of hours they spend on structured E-sport where there is a coach present.	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Training load (unstructured E-sport)	Participants are asked about the number of hours they spend on unstructured E-sport without a coach present.	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Physical activity levels	International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form (7 item questionnaire).; This questionnaire assess the number of days per week spent on vigorous and moderate physical activity, walking and sitting. The questionnaire also assess the amount of time per day (hours/minutes) spent on these activities.	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Hours of sleep	Participants are asked about how many hours they sleep on average during a night.	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Trouble falling a sleep	Participants are asked if they have trouble falling a sleep at night (Not at all, some nights, most nights, don't know)	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Waking up several times at night	Participants are asked if they wake up several times at night (Not at all, some nights, most nights, don't know)	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Trouble sleeping through the night	Participants are asked if they have trouble sleeping all through the night (Not at all, some nights, most nights, don't know)	Baseline - at time of inclusion
Secondary	Tiered in the morning.	Participants are asked if they feel tiered in the morning (Not at all, some mornings, most mornings, don't know)	Baseline - at time of inclusion