Multicenter Observational Study for the Evaluation in Clinical Practice of Urinary Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial

— MUSA  

Official title:

A Multicentre Observational Study for the Evaluation in Clinical Practice of the Initial Diagnostic-therapeutic Path of Urinary Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05075642
• Other study ID #: E - 0027793
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: November 2021
• Est. completion date: July 2023

Study information

• Verified date: September 2021
• Source: ASP 7 Ragusa
• Contact: Carmela Leone, MD
• Phone: 00393203047748
• Email: carmela.leone[@]asp.rg.it
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The major part of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) experiences Low Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) secondary to neurogenic Low Urinary Tract Dysfunctions (n-LUTDs) during the course of MS, reaching almost 100% after about 10 years. N-LUTDs represent an important issue for pwMS, especially for their negative impact on Quality of Life (QoL), as they are mainly youngs in the prime of their life. Moreover n-LUTDs can lead to serious complications on the urinary tract as infections or renal failure. Therefore, the neurologist in daily clinical practice must intercept the possible presence of LUTS as soon as possible so that he can promptly initiate optimal management. To do this, it is essential to provide neurologists with validated, reproducible and sensitive tools that are, above all, easy to use in an outpatient setting. Our clinical research seeks, for the first time, to show whether pwMS get any improvement after the initial LUTS management, whether this improvement, if any, is related to the professional figure takes care about LUTS (neurologist vs urologist) and if there is an objective improvement of voiding performances on standardized measures.

Description:

The investigators will conduct a multicenter observational no-profit study to investigate the impact of Low Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) management on subjective measure of patient global impression of improvement.

Initial management of LUTS in MS should address both voiding and storage deficiency symptoms and is determined by the severity of symptoms and the risk of developing upper urinary tract damage. First-line treatments include behavioral / physical ones, such as rehabilitation of the pelvic floor, and pharmacological ones (antimuscarinics, alpha-lytics, beta3 agonists); second-line treatments are represented by intradetrusorial (or intrasphinteric) injection of botulinum toxin and by non-invasive (percutaneous and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation) and invasive (sacral neuromodulation) neuromodulation techniques; third-line treatments consist of surgical approaches. According to the various consensus and recommendations available for MS, the initial approach in most cases should be the prerogative of the neurologist, while the neurourologist should intervene when the initial treatment has been ineffective or there are pathologies of the urinary tract that require a non-postponable specialist evaluation.

As regards the effectiveness of any initial management of LUTS in pcSM, there are, to the best of our knowledge, no studies in the literature that have analyzed the phenomenon, both in terms of subjective perception of clinical improvement and in objective terms of objective improved "voiding performance".

This study was developed with the primary intention of measuring, through the observation of real clinical practice, the presence and extent of improvement (through the PGI-I scale) of the subject with LUTS after at least three months of any type of initial management. A subgroup analysis will help us to assess whether the neurologist's management of LUTS is different from that of the urologist in terms of perceived improvement.

A patient reported outcome assessing quality of life (Qualiveen-SF), a three-day frequency / volume chart, and post-voiding residual volume (PVR) will be used as secondary outcomes to reveal the effectiveness of the two approaches on quality of life and data objective measures of urinary disorders.

The study also aims to 1) evaluate the prevalence of LUTS through a new diagnostic algorithm that consists of two questionnaires (the Urinary Bothersome Questionnaire-MS and the Actionable Bladder Symptoms Screening Tool-ABSST) and an objective measure of voiding dysfunction-the PVR and 2) analyze the influence of the more common risk factors on the presence of LUTS as thus diagnosed.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 214
• Est. completion date: July 2023
• Est. primary completion date: May 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• People with MS (relapsing-remitting, secondary progressive, primary progressive phenotype) or clinically isolated demyelinating disease syndrome-CIS) according to McDonald's 2001 criteria, consecutively afferent to the outpatient clinic or hospitalized after study approval by the ethics committee.

They:

• have never been previously evaluated and/or treated for LUTS secondary to MS;

• are between 18 and 80 years old;

• have given written consent to study part.

Exclusion Criteria:

• analphabetism;

• severe cognitive impairment;

• severe psychiatric pathologies;

• EDSS> 7;

• clinical relapse of MS within the previous 30 days;

• history of urinary fevers > 2 in the last 6 months or > 3 in the last year;

• indwelling catheter;

• renal failure (creatinine> 1.2 mg / dL);

• presence of hydronephrosis, mono or bilateral vesicoureteral reflux;

• presence of urinary stones;

• history of urological surgery, neoplasms of the urogenital system and / or pelvic radiotherapy;

• therapy/treatment for LUTS secondary to MS or other diseases.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Multiple Sclerosis
• Sclerosis
• Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic

Intervention

Other:
• Initial management of the urinary disorder/s identified during the screening phase
Intervention can be defined as the initial management of the LUTS identified during the screening phase; management lasts at least three months. As observation of routine clinical practice, no specific intervention is included, but any counseling/drug/rehabilitation included as first line management.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Multiple Sclerosis Center of ASP 7 Ragusa	Vittoria	Ragusa

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
ASP 7 Ragusa

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (32)

Al Dandan HB, Coote S, McClurg D. Prevalence of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J MS Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;22(2):91-99. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2019-030. — View Citation

Amarenco G, Chartier-Kastler E, Denys P, Jean JL, de Sèze M, Lubetzski C. First-line urological evaluation in multiple sclerosis: validation of a specific decision-making algorithm. Mult Scler. 2013 Dec;19(14):1931-7. doi: 10.1177/1352458513489758. Epub 2 — View Citation

Bates D, Burks J, Globe D, Signori M, Hudgens S, Denys P, Macdiarmid S, Nitti V, Odderson I, Ross AP, Chancellor M. Development of a short form and scoring algorithm from the validated actionable bladder symptom screening tool. BMC Neurol. 2013 Jul 9;13:7 — View Citation

Bates P, Bradley WE, Glen E, Melchior H, Rowan D, Sterling A, Hald T. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Eur Urol. 1976;2(6):274-6. — View Citation

Bjelic-Radisic V, Ulrich D, Hinterholzer S, Reinstadler E, Geiss I, Aigmueller T, Tamussino K, Greimel E, Trutnovsky G; Austrian Urogynecology Working Group. Psychometric properties and validation of two global impression questionnaires (PGI-S, PGI-I) for — View Citation

Bonniaud V, Bryant D, Parratte B, Guyatt G. Development and validation of the short form of a urinary quality of life questionnaire: SF-Qualiveen. J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.016. Epub 2008 Oct 31. — View Citation

Bonniaud V, Bryant D, Parratte B, Guyatt G. Qualiveen, a urinary-disorder specific instrument: 0.5 corresponds to the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.008. Epub 2008 Jan 7. — View Citation

Burks J, Chancellor M, Bates D, Denys P, Macdiarmid S, Nitti V, Globe D, Signori M, Hudgens S, Odderson I, Panicker J, Ross AP. Development and validation of the actionable bladder symptom screening tool for multiple sclerosis patients. Int J MS Care. 201 — View Citation

De Ridder D, Van Der Aa F, Debruyne J, D'hooghe MB, Dubois B, Guillaume D, Heerings M, Ilsbroukx S, Medaer R, Nagels G, Seeldrayers P, Van Landegem W, Willekens B, Zicot AF. Consensus guidelines on the neurologist's role in the management of neurogenic lo — View Citation

de Sèze M, Ruffion A, Denys P, Joseph PA, Perrouin-Verbe B; GENULF. The neurogenic bladder in multiple sclerosis: review of the literature and proposal of management guidelines. Mult Scler. 2007 Aug;13(7):915-28. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Review. — View Citation

Denys P, Phe V, Even A, Chartier-Kastler E. Therapeutic strategies of urinary disorders in MS. Practice and algorithms. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Jul;57(5):297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Review. — View Citation

Domurath B, Kurze I, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Kaufmann A, Feneberg W, Schmidt P, Henze T, Flachenecker P, Brandt A, Vance WN, Beck J, Vonthien M, Ratering K; MS Consensus Group. Neurourological assessment in people with multiple sclerosis (MS): a new evaluat — View Citation

Fowler CJ, Griffiths D, de Groat WC. The neural control of micturition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jun;9(6):453-66. doi: 10.1038/nrn2401. Review. — View Citation

Ghezzi A, Carone R, Del Popolo G, Amato MP, Bertolotto A, Comola M, Del Carro U, Di Benedetto P, Giannantoni A, Lopes de Carvalho ML, Montanari E, Patti F, Protti A, Rasia S, Salonia A, Scandellari C, Sperli F, Spinelli M, Solaro C, Uccelli A, Zaffaroni M — View Citation

Ghezzi A, Mutta E, Bianchi F, Bonavita S, Buttari F, Caramma A, Cavarretta R, Centonze D, Coghe GC, Coniglio G, Del Carro U, Ferrò MT, Marrosu MG, Patti F, Rovaris M, Sparaco M, Simone I, Tortorella C, Bergamaschi R. Diagnostic tools for assessment of uri — View Citation

Grasso MG, Pozzilli C, Anzini A, Salvetti M, Bastianello S, Fieschi C. Relationship between bladder dysfunction and brain MRI in multiple sclerosis. Funct Neurol. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):289-92. — View Citation

Griffiths D, Tadic SD. Bladder control, urgency, and urge incontinence: evidence from functional brain imaging. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(6):466-74. Review. — View Citation

Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Gross T, Hamid R, Karsenty G, Kessler TM, Schneider M, 't Hoen L, Blok B. Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Neuro-Urology. Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):324-33. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo. — View Citation

Khalaf KM, Coyne KS, Globe DR, Malone DC, Armstrong EP, Patel V, Burks J. The impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on health-related quality of life among patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):48-54. doi: 10.1002/nau.22670. — View Citation

Li V, Panicker JN, Haslam C, Chataway J. Use of a symptom-based questionnaire to screen for the presence of significant voiding dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis and lower urinary tract symptoms: a pilot study. J Neurol. 2020 Dec;267(12):368 — View Citation

Litwiller SE, Frohman EM, Zimmern PE. Multiple sclerosis and the urologist. J Urol. 1999 Mar;161(3):743-57. Review. Erratum in: J Urol 1999 Jul;162(1):172. — View Citation

McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den Noort S, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple scleros — View Citation

Medina-Polo J, Adot JM, Allué M, Arlandis S, Blasco P, Casanova B, Matías-Guiu J, Madurga B, Meza-Murillo ER, Müller-Arteaga C, Rodríguez-Acevedo B, Vara J, Zubiaur MC, López-Fando L. Consensus document on the multidisciplinary management of neurogenic lo — View Citation

Monti Bragadin M, Motta R, Messmer Uccelli M, Tacchino A, Ponzio M, Podda J, Konrad G, Rinaldi S, Della Cava M, Battaglia MA, Brichetto G. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis: A post-void residual analysis of 501 cases. Mul — View Citation

Musco S, Padilla-Fernández B, Del Popolo G, Bonifazi M, Blok BFM, Groen J, 't Hoen L, Pannek J, Bonzon J, Kessler TM, Schneider MP, Gross T, Karsenty G, Phé V, Hamid R, Ecclestone H, Castro-Diaz D. Value of urodynamic findings in predicting upper urinary — View Citation

Panicker JN, Fowler CJ, Kessler TM. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the neurological patient: clinical assessment and management. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jul;14(7):720-32. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00070-8. Review. — View Citation

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS. Diagnostic criteria for multiple — View Citation

Tsang B, Stothers L, Macnab A, Lazare D, Nigro M. A systematic review and comparison of questionnaires in the management of spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis and the neurogenic bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Mar;35(3):354-64. doi: 10.1002/nau.22720. — View Citation

Twiss CO, Fischer MC, Nitti VW. Comparison between reduction in 24-hour pad weight, International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and Post-Operative Patient Global Impression of Improve — View Citation

Viktrup L, Hayes RP, Wang P, Shen W. Construct validation of patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) and improvement (PGI-I) questionnaires in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMC Urol — View Citation

Welk B, Morrow S, Madarasz W, Baverstock R, Macnab J, Sequeira K. The validity and reliability of the neurogenic bladder symptom score. J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Feb 8. — View Citation

Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. — View Citation

* Note: There are 32 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Prevalence of LUTS	Considering all participants underwent screening visit, it will be estimated the prevalence of Low Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS); a new diagnostic screening model consisting of the Urinary Bothersome Questionnaire for Multiple Sclerosis (UBQ-MS), the Actionable Bladder Symptoms Screening Tool (ABSST) questionnaire and the PVR volume is used; LUTS is defined by the presence of at least one diagnostic tool with abnormal finding: UBQ-MS score at least 1, ABSST at least 3, PVR at least 100 ml or more than 30% of pre-void assessed volume.	at Visit 0 (screening visit)
Other	Demographic, Clinical and instrumental characteristics	Evaluating the presence of demographic (age, sex, BMI), clinical (disease duration, phenotype, Expanded Disease Status Scale, spinal lesions and their location, therapy, comorbidities) and instrumental factors (urinalysis with urine culture, radiological imaging, number of urinations and urgency-frequency episodes with frequency / volume chart) predictive of the type of urinary disorders reported.	at visit 0 (screening visit)
Other	Patient global impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire, Qualiveen-Short Form questionnaire, Post-void residual volume (PVR) amount, Micturitions' frequency and episodes of urgency/incontinence at three days frequency/volume chart	Finally, by means of a subgroup analysis, the investigators will evaluate whether enrolled participants managed by neurologists or by urologists show any difference in scores of Patient global impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire, Qualiveen-Short Form questionnaire, Post-void residual volume (PVR) assessment, Micturitions' frequency and episodes of urgency/incontinence at three days frequency/volume chart.; According to the specific MS center clinical practice, patients with MS may be managed by the neurologist or by the urologist by the urologist to whom they will be referred.	at visit 0 (screening visit) and visit 2 (weeks 12-16 from Visit 1, that is the management start-up visit)
Primary	Patient global impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire	In participants with recorded LUTS, it will be measured the subjective impression of improvement after at least three months of stable urinary disorder management, by means of the PGI-I questionnaire. The PGI-I is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's impression of change with values ranging from 1 to 7; higher scores mean a worse outcome. Patient is required to "Check the one number that best describes how you feel now" by entering his answer on a 7-point scale scored as: (1) "very much better," (2) "much better," (3) "a little better," (4) "no change," (5) "a little worse," (6) "much worse," or (7) "very much worse." For this study, investigators will evaluated as primary outcome measure "the percentage of patient gave a response to PGI-I equal to or less than 2".	at the end-of-study visit named Visit 2, corresponding at week 12-16 from Visit 1, that is the management start-up visit
Secondary	Qualiveen-Short Form (SF) questionnaire	In participants with recorded LUTS, it will be measured the patient reported urinary-related quality of life by means of the Qualiveen-Short Form (SF) questionnaire. It's a specific health related quality of life (HRQOL) with questionnaire for urinary disorders in patients with neurological conditions, such as Multiple Sclerosis.; The Qualiveen-SF is an 8-items questionnaire. Response options are framed as 5-point Likert-type scales with 0 indicating no impact of urinary problems on HRQOL and 4 indicating a high adverse impact of urinary difficulty on HRQOL. Qualiveen domain scores are calculated as an average of the scores on items in that domain and, thus, the range is 0 to 4 with an overall score representing the mean of the 4 domains, which also ranges from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean worse outcome.; For this study investigators will evaluated whether three-months (max 4 months) of urinary disorder stable management may change HRQOL in terms of Qualiveen-SF scores.	at the end of screening period named Visit 0, and at Visit 2 (weeks 12-16 from Visit 1, that is the management start-up visit)
Secondary	Post-void residual volume (PVR) assessment	The post-void residual volume (PVR) measured in ml is the urine volume remaining in bladder after a physiological micturition. It will be measured by ultrasound scans and calculated by the radiologist subtracting post-void bladder volume from pre-void bladder volume.; For this study, the investigators will evaluate whether three months (max 4 months) of urinary disorder stable management may change the amount of PVR.; Lower volume values mean better outcome.	at visit 0 and Visit 2 (weeks 12-16 from Visit 1, that is the management start-up visit)
Secondary	Micturitions' frequency and episodes of urgency/incontinence at three days frequency/volume chart	In participants with recorded LUTS, it will be measured the number of daily micturitions and episodes of urgency or incontinence signed on a three days frequency/volume chart. Frequency/volume chart is a brief diary where patients are asked to record for three days how many times they urinate and the volume of each micturition; they are also asked to record each episode of urinary urgency and incontinence. Higher numbers mean worse outcome.; As secondary outcome, it will be evaluated whether three months (max 4 months) of urinary disorder stable management may change the numbers of micturitions and numbers of urinary urgency and/or incontinence.	at visit 0 and Visit 2 (weeks 12-16 from Visit 1, that is the management start-up visit)