Deciphering the Role of the Gut Microbiota in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Deciphering the Role of the Gut Microbiota in Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02580435
• Other study ID #: 2356-15-SMC
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: October 18, 2015
• Last updated: October 28, 2015
• Start date: December 2015
• Est. completion date: December 2021

Study information

• Verified date: October 2015
• Source: Sheba Medical Center
• Contact: Anat Achiron, MD, PhD
• Phone: 97235303932
• Email: anat.achiron[@]sheba.health.gov.il
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Israel: Ministry of Health
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease that affects the nervous system and results in a wide range of signs and symptoms including physical and cognitive problems. Recent evidence demonstrates that interactions between the host immune system and the commensal gut microbiota have a key role in the development of the disease. However, the natures of these interactions are poorly studied, and the set of bacteria with pathogenic or protective potential are unknown. Here, the investigators propose a multi-pronged approach to deciphering the role of the microbiota in MS, by developing microbiome-based machine learning algorithms aimed at: (1) distinguishing healthy individuals from MS patients; (2) predicting the time since the onset of MS in relation to disease activity by predicting next relapse and neurological progression; (3) identifying microbiome signatures that characterize the relapse state; (4) distinguishing various MS phenotypes in relation to blood and microbiome transcriptome signatures; (5) predicting response to various immunomodulatory treatments in relation to blood and microbiome transcriptome signatures. Overall, these studies should establish the role of the microbiome in multiple sclerosis, resulting in a set of non-invasive tools for characterization of the disease; identification of the kinetics of MS using microbiome as a readout; and allowing the prediction of individuals prone to MS based on their microbiome and in relation to their protein expression. These new set of diagnostic and predictive tools may thus add a novel and unexplored dimension to the study of the disease that may lead in the future to new therapeutic avenues based on designing microbiome-targeted interventions.

Description:

Description of methods and plan of operation

Our research plan consists of the following steps:

1. Cohort assembly. For each of the above aims the investigators will use the unique database of the Sheba Medical Center to identify the relevant individuals and invite them to take part in the study. Prof. Achiron has much experience in conducting many research projects that utilize the unique patient database available to the Center. For the first aim comparing MS patients to healthy individuals the investigators will select sex-, age- and diet-matched healthy individuals, ideally selecting spouses of MS patients as healthy controls as individuals living in the same environment have more similar microbiota. In our second aim comparing MS patients with similar time from diagnosis but different disease severity, the investigators will select MS patients that span the largest possible spectrum of disease severity as judged by the EDSS score employed by the Center. For the final aim individuals at high risk of relapse will be invited for profiling every 6 months and if relapse occurs, they will be profiled upon their visit to the Center as well as one month after the relapse event.

2. Cohort profiling. From each patient, the investigators will obtain a multi-dimensional data from the MS database consisting, as appropriate, of a subset of: (1) Clinical metadata, including: Consent form; Medications; annual relapse rate; (2) Blood tests, including a complete blood count, complete biochemistry, lipid profile, cholesterol profile; (3) Complete neurological examination for obtaining an EDSS score, cognitive assessment, gait assessment; MRI imaging data, evoked potentials, treatment response; (4) Blood samples will be processed for protein mRNA expression and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) will be separated on Ficoll-Hypaque gradient, total RNA purified, labeled, hybridized to Genechip array (U133A2), and scanned (GeneArray-TM scanner G2500A; Hewlett Packard) according to the manufacturer's protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). MAS5 software (Affymetrix) will be used to analyze the scanned arrays containing ~22,000 gene transcripts corresponding to 14,500 well-annotated human genes. (5) Gut microbiota profile obtained from stool samples will be processed for shotgun metagenomic sequencing and 16S rRNA profiling. Gut microbiota profiling will be done from stool samples that will be immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at a minimum of -80°C until further processing. Samples will then be processed by an automated robotic pipeline that was developed in the Segal lab at Weizmann. This pipeline works in 96-well format and can extract DNA from 96 stool samples within one day, prepare DNA Illumina libraries for shotgun metagenomic sequencing within another day, and carry out multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the 16S rRNA gene in another day. Thus, every 96-stool sample group collected can be processed robotically for both 16S and metagenomic sequencing within 3 days under the supervision of one lab technician.

3. Data analysis and algorithmic development. (I) Microbiota: To comprehensively study the role of the microbiome in MS, the investigators will go much beyond the standard 16S rRNA analysis and into analysis of full shotgun metagenome samples. By sequencing the entire DNA content of stool samples, metagenome sequencing can potentially provide much more information as compared to 16S, as it allows to study genome structure, structural variants, and gene and metabolic pathway functions. After extracting these features from the microbiome (see below in Preliminary Results), the investigators will start by employing basic univariate and multivariate association tests, and continue with more complex machine learning models that attempt to distinguish individuals with MS from those without based on microbiome features (aim 1), to classify disease severity (aim 2), to predict relapse risk (aim 3), to differentiate between MS disease phenotypes i.e., radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), primary-progressive MS (PPMS), (aim 4), and to identify treatment responders (aim 5). (II) Blood: To analyze protein expression Partek Genomics Software (www.partek.com) will be used.

4. Univariate and multivariate analyses. The investigators will first compute the correlation (Pearson and Spearman) between all microbiome features extracted across all profiled individuals and the different patient measurements (EDSS score, time from relapse, etc.), and correct for the multiple hypotheses performed. Since the investigators will generate a vast number of microbiome features and many of them are highly correlated to each other, this analysis may suffer from lack of statistical power, especially given that the number of participants will be far smaller than the number of features. For this reason, the investigators will also perform multivariate analyses (e.g., singular value decomposition, principal component analysis) since the key components identified by these methods capture the main variation in the data in a way that takes into account the internal structure and relationships between the different input features. The investigators will then test whether projections of the data by any of the main principal components in this analysis provides a significant segregation of the participants by their measured metabolic parameters. As a different type of multivariate analysis, the investigators will also employ different unsupervised clustering methods (e.g., hierarchical clustering, naïve Bayes) to cluster the participants by their microbiome feature data, and then examine the clusters for enrichment in normal or abnormal metabolic parameters.

Machine learning algorithms. As a more global approach aimed at quantifying the overall contribution of the microbiome to MS and at unraveling the relative contribution of the different microbiome features, the investigators will classify the study participants into several groups in each aim (e.g., in aim 1 patients versus healthy individuals; in aim 2 individuals with high versus low EDSS score for the similar time from MS diagnosis), and develop different computational methods (e.g., boosted decision trees, Support Vector Machine algorithms (SVMs)) for this classification problem using only the microbiome features generated above. The investigators will use a cross validation scheme, whereby the model training is done on the data of a randomly chosen subset of participants and then tested on the data of the remaining held out participants. In addition, the investigators will leave aside a test set on which the investigators will evaluate the final model that is derived in cross validation, allowing a true estimate of the performance of our models. As the number of microbiome features and thus the number of dimensions is large, the investigators will employ various feature selection approaches as means of avoiding overfitting and reducing dimensionality. The Segal lab (Weizmann) has pioneered the development of several such methods in similar settings in the area of gene regulation. The investigators will also use a similar scheme to predict the continuous EDSS score representing MS severity. The problem setup is similar to classification, but the method development is quite different as the classification methods are replaced with regression type of methods (e.g., linear regression, probabilistic models, stochastic gradient descent).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 520
• Est. completion date: December 2021
• Est. primary completion date: December 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of RIS, CIS, RRMS, PPMS.

• Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnancy

• Lactation

• Severe cognitive decline.

Study Design

Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Multiple Sclerosis
• Sclerosis

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Sheba Medical Center	Weizmann Institute of Science

References & Publications (8)

Achiron A, Gurevich M, Snir Y, Segal E, Mandel M. Zinc-ion binding and cytokine activity regulation pathways predicts outcome in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007 Aug;149(2):235-42. Epub 2007 May 4. — View Citation

Berer K, Mues M, Koutrolos M, Rasbi ZA, Boziki M, Johner C, Wekerle H, Krishnamoorthy G. Commensal microbiota and myelin autoantigen cooperate to trigger autoimmune demyelination. Nature. 2011 Oct 26;479(7374):538-41. doi: 10.1038/nature10554. — View Citation

Geuking MB, Cahenzli J, Lawson MA, Ng DC, Slack E, Hapfelmeier S, McCoy KD, Macpherson AJ. Intestinal bacterial colonization induces mutualistic regulatory T cell responses. Immunity. 2011 May 27;34(5):794-806. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.021. Epub 2011 May 19. — View Citation

Hapfelmeier S, Lawson MA, Slack E, Kirundi JK, Stoel M, Heikenwalder M, Cahenzli J, Velykoredko Y, Balmer ML, Endt K, Geuking MB, Curtiss R 3rd, McCoy KD, Macpherson AJ. Reversible microbial colonization of germ-free mice reveals the dynamics of IgA immune responses. Science. 2010 Jun 25;328(5986):1705-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1188454. — View Citation

Maslowski KM, Vieira AT, Ng A, Kranich J, Sierro F, Yu D, Schilter HC, Rolph MS, Mackay F, Artis D, Xavier RJ, Teixeira MM, Mackay CR. Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature. 2009 Oct 29;461(7268):1282-6. doi: 10.1038/nature08530. — View Citation

Slack E, Hapfelmeier S, Stecher B, Velykoredko Y, Stoel M, Lawson MA, Geuking MB, Beutler B, Tedder TF, Hardt WD, Bercik P, Verdu EF, McCoy KD, Macpherson AJ. Innate and adaptive immunity cooperate flexibly to maintain host-microbiota mutualism. Science. 2009 Jul 31;325(5940):617-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1172747. — View Citation

Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, Zilberman-Schapira G, Thaiss CA, Maza O, Israeli D, Zmora N, Gilad S, Weinberger A, Kuperman Y, Harmelin A, Kolodkin-Gal I, Shapiro H, Halpern Z, Segal E, Elinav E. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. 2014 Oct 9;514(7521):181-6. doi: 10.1038/nature13793. Epub 2014 Sep 17. — View Citation

Thaiss CA, Zeevi D, Levy M, Zilberman-Schapira G, Suez J, Tengeler AC, Abramson L, Katz MN, Korem T, Zmora N, Kuperman Y, Biton I, Gilad S, Harmelin A, Shapiro H, Halpern Z, Segal E, Elinav E. Transkingdom control of microbiota diurnal oscillations promotes metabolic homeostasis. Cell. 2014 Oct 23;159(3):514-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.048. Epub 2014 Oct 16. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	1. Change in expression of intestinal microbiome composition between MS patients and healthy controls.	Intestinal microbiome composition and function of a cohort of 50 untreated early MS patients, up to 12 months from onset, untreated with immunomodulatory drugs or steroids for at least 3 months, as well as 50 age-, sex-, and diet-matched healthy controls (obtained from the Weizmann DataBank) will be performed.	5 years	No
Primary	Change in microbiome expression intestinal microbiome composition between MS patients phenotypes.	Intestinal microbiome composition and function and blood profiling of 100 patients with different disease phenotypes (RIS=20; CIS=30; RRMS=30; PPMS=20) will be performed.	5 years	No