Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT00318487 |
Other study ID # |
2006/126 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 1, 2007 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2012 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2022 |
Source |
University Hospital, Ghent |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Fifteen (15) patients completely edentulous in the maxilla will be treated with 8 dental
implants. The total treatment will be done in 2 stages to allow, within the same group, a
study of two different approaches. Miniscrews that can be functionally loaded will be
provided by 3i with the design and surface textures as wanted by the study sponsor.
Description:
The department of oral surgery in Ghent has a lot of patients for bilateral sinus lift
procedures. The group of patients should have enough bone for installation of 4 dental
implants in the area 14-24. In this region 4 implants will be installed and immediate loading
with a provisional acrylic (metal reinforced) bridge will be provided. The survival and
success of the implants immediate functional loading will be studied (interest point 1). Two
different implant surfaces are used in the study to be compared (interest point 2) in
relation to peri-implant parameters, radiographical healing, and success criteria at the same
time bilateral sinus lifting is performed. One sinus is filled with a mixture of iliac crest
bone and Bio-Oss (Geistlich Germany), and the second sinus is filled with calvarial skull
bone and Bio-oss. The latter bone combination is appreciated clinically by the surgeons since
it leads to a subjectively better implant stability. This, however, remains to be
investigated. This study can compare both harvesting techniques and evaluate clinical
treatment outcome (interest point 3). Normally, there is a certain waiting time after sinus
lifting before dental implants are installed. Recently, however, some literature abstracts
indicate that immediate placement of the implants in the sinus lifted bone can be successful.
However, this is not done with immediate functional loading. We propose to install in total 6
miniscrews, 2 in each sinus lift area. Four will be loaded immediately and connected rigidly
to the other 4 normal sized implants. Actually the immediate loaded bridge will be supported,
in total, by 4 normal and 4 miniscrew implants. Four months after loading, the 4 loaded
miniscrews are removed with a trephine drill in order to examine soft-tissue healing,
bone-implant contact, and bone healing by means of histomorphometry. Since the implants are
in cortical bone + sinus lifted bone, it will be possible to examine the given implant
surface under immediate loading in both bone conditions (interest point 4). Immediately after
removing the miniscrews, they are replaced by the normal sized implants. One side will be
randomly assigned for immediate non-functional loading, the other side will be assigned to a
non-loaded condition. With this latter design we can mimic the partial sinus lift condition
as it is often done 4 months after sinus lifting - the classical procedure. At the time of
exposing the implants of the 2-stage procedure, the miniscrews are removed. This gives us an
idea of bone healing of an implant installed 4 months after sinus lifting and kept
additionally unloaded for 4 months. This gives us histology of immediately loaded implants in
healed sinus lifted bone (interest point 5).