Monitoring Clinical Trial
— SWITCHOfficial title:
SWITCH- Surgical Ward Innovation: Telemonitoring Controlled by Healthdot Evaluation of Implementation
This observational clinical, single center trial is designed to evaluate the implementation of an already validated smart monitoring device, the Philips Healthdot, on one surgical ward at the Catharina hospital in Eindhoven, The Netherlands. This study is performed during 6 months in which all patients admitted to one surgical ward will be enrolled. Implementation is established by a step-by-step approach in which the current manually performed spot check monitoring (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, heart rate, temperature and pain score), with the early warning score (EWS), is continued besides smart monitoring with the Healthdot (respiratory rate, heart rate and physical activity) during the first three months (phase 1). This phase aims at optimizing the infrastructure, education of hospital staff and practice with application/ activation and interpretation of the device. Upward of 4 months, Healthdot monitoring will be the primary monitoring method and spot check monitoring is only performed additionally in case of doubt about clinical condition or requirement of additional vital parameters. Evaluation of the implementation will be performed with a focus group and various questionnaire regarding fidelity, acceptability, adoption, feasibility, appropriateness and costs. Thereby additional analysis regarding monitoring algorithms will be performed.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 500 |
Est. completion date | November 1, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | October 1, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Nurses and physicians form the primary research population. - Nurses and physicians, participating in het focus group will sign informed consent. Patients won't be included for participation since the Healthdot will be the new standard of care regarding monitoring. Patients will however sign informed consent at admission for use of anonymized data. Inclusion Criteria: Nurses - Registered in the national register of medical professions (Big register) - Appointed as a nurse at the Catharina hospital and working at the surgical department during the study period - Willingness to participate in the core group for evaluation of the implementation Physicians - Registered in the national register of medical professions (Big register) - Appointed at the Catharina hospital as a physician or resident during the study period. - Willingness to participate in the core group for evaluation of the implementation Exclusion Criteria: Nurses & Physicians - Termination of employment within the study period - No voluntarily participation in the core group evaluation meetings Contra-indications for applying Healthdot - Known to have severe allergy for the tissue adhesive used in the Healthdot. - Any skin condition, for example prior severe rash, discoloration, scars or open wounds at the area of application - Pregnant, or breastfeeding - Use of topicals that are known to irritate the skin at the application area (such as medical and non-medical creams or lotions) - Patient with active implantable device such as a Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker - Unable to understand instructions - Left lower rib (place where Healthdot will be applied) is involved in the area of surgery, area of disinfection or area where bandages are needed. - Transfer to a different ward during hospitalization |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Netherlands | Catharina hospital | Eindhoven | Noord-Brabant |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven | Philips Electronics Nederland B.V. acting through Philips CTO organization |
Netherlands,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Evaluation of the implementation of a continuous monitoring method on the surgical ward | Workload: the experienced workload for nursing staff during the implementation of the Healthdot measured with the IWS and during focus group analysis | Conducted on a daily base during the entire study, month 1-6 | |
Secondary | Adoption | The intention and attitude towards the use of the Healthdot monitoring method. Measured with evidence-based practise attitude scale (EBPAS) | 3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6 | |
Secondary | Feasibility of the Healthdot | The extent to which the Healthdot monitoring method can be successfully carried out by the healthcare employees. Measured with a thematic analysis and input from the core group (Braun and Clark) | 3 focus groups sessions at month 3, 5 and 6 | |
Secondary | Acceptability | The additional effort regarding the amount of spot checks per hospital admission day per patient. Calculated with data from the electronic patient file records | Evaluated at month 4 and 6 | |
Secondary | Appropriateness | Relation between device false alarms (noise) and correct alarms based on the alarming protocol. Measured as signal to noise ratio (SNR) | Evaluated after at month 4 and 6 | |
Secondary | Usability | Number of unexpected events that occur during or result from the use of the Healthdot medical device. Measured as adverse device events (ADE) | Evaluated after at month 4 and 6 | |
Secondary | Feasibility and effectiveness | The amount of time needed to perform and process a complete manual spot check or digital monitoring check. Measured by manual time measurement | Manual time measurement during month 1-6, 2 times a week at different days | |
Secondary | Costs | Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the duration of admission, the associated admission costs and the monitoring method. Calculation based on provided care and associated costs | After completing of the study at 6 months | |
Secondary | Algorithm improvement | Advanced algorithm analyses for improved monitoring protocols with use of artificial intelligence (AI) | After completing of the study at 6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04549623 -
End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Device for Sedation During Endoscopic Ultrasonography
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02744573 -
Evaluation Of The Analgesia Nociception Index vs. Surgical Pleth Index Under General And Regional Anaesthesia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05554263 -
Comparison of Automated Control Anesthesia and Manual Control Anesthesia in Minimal Flow Anesthesia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03426579 -
Correlation Between Sedation Depth Monitoring and Reflexes During Intravenous Anesthesia With Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Children Undergoing Direct Laryngoscopy for Surgical Procedures
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05501314 -
Remote Home Monitoring Acute Pancreatitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04138966 -
Comparing Skin Conductance and Nol-index
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05593380 -
The Effect of BIA Monitoring of Brain Edema on the Neurological Prognosis of Supratentorial Massive ICH
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03981042 -
Comparison Between the Neuromuscular Blockade Onset Monitoring and the Expectation of a Fixed Delay After Curarization on the Quality of Laryngoscopy During Intubation in Elective Surgery (MONITURARE)
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03813264 -
Optimizing Outcomes of Dynamic Psychotherapy by the MATRIX: A Preliminary Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03074487 -
Evaluating Monitoring Techniques for Postoperative Spinal Cord Ischemia
|
||
Completed |
NCT04609436 -
SmartCardia Wireless Recorder as a Telemetry System
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05181111 -
Continuous Monitoring of Patients in and After the Acute Admission Ward to Optimize Clinical Pathways
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03965702 -
Impact of an Assisted Fluid Management System on Microvascular Parameters
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05368740 -
Integrated Pulmonary Index Monitoring for Thoracic Surgery Patients
|