Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% for Local Anesthesia of MIH-affected Maxillary Molars

Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation Clinical Trial

Official title: Comparative Study of Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% in Local Anesthesia and Permanent Maxillary First Molars Affected by MIH.

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Comparison of injection pain with lidocaine and articaine. Comparison of the efficacy of lidocaine and articaine during treatment of MIH- maxillary molars.

Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, Triple-blinding clinical study including twenty six cooperative children, aged 6-12years old

Clinical Trial Description

Background and Aims: Some dentists have difficulty obtaining effective anesthesia when treating MIH molars.

There are no studies comparing the effectiveness of lidocaine and articaine in MIH-maxillary molars.

Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, Triple-blinding clinical study including twenty six cooperative children , aged 6-12 years old. Each child was randomly assigned to either articaine 4% or lidocaine 2% in their first session with the second solution being used at the second session. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Dental Enamel Hypoplasia
• Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation

• NCT number: NCT05585112
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Tishreen University
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
• Start date: October 17, 2022
• Completion date: December 25, 2022