Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05696509 |
Other study ID # |
AMU3 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 3, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
October 16, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2023 |
Source |
Astana Medical University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Abstract Anaesthetic support for cardiac surgery significantly influences the course of the
intraoperative period and the success of the postoperative period. Total intravenous
anaesthesia and inhalation anaesthesia are the traditional methods of anaesthesia in cardiac
surgery. However, there are few studies assessing the effectiveness of surgical aggression
protection in cardiac surgery.
Objectives: To study the effect of anesthetics on clinical outcome after mitral and aortic
valve replacement in adults.
Methods. The data of 75 patients operated in the Cardiosurgery Department of the Medical
Center Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan were
included in the study. All patients underwent mitral, aortic valve replacement/plasty under
cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) conditions.
All patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of anaesthesia: the first (1)
group patients anaesthetised with propofol (P), the second group with sevoflurane (S), and
the last one is with isoflurane (I).
To maintain anaesthesia in Group 1 propofol was used as anaesthetic in a dose of 6 mg/kg/h
intravenously on perfusion. In Group 2 the anaesthetic used was sevoflurane in a dose of
1.7-1.9 MAC. Group 3 used isoflurane in the dose of 1.1-1.2 MAC as anaesthetic. Statistical
analysis was done by the method of single factor analysis of variance and Kruskal Wallis
criterion.
Description:
This study includes data from 90 patients operated in the Cardiosurgery Department of the
Medical Center Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan were
included in the study. All patients underwent mitral, aortic valve replacement/plasty under
cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) conditions. This research work was conducted between 2020 and
2022. To calculate the sample size, the investigators used the formula n=t2*D*N/confidence
interval*N+t2*α, which will allow to identify the static significance of the study.
All patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of anaesthesia: the first (1)
group patients anaesthetised with propofol (P), the second group with sevoflurane (S), and
the last one is with isoflurane (I).
The study was conducted in 5 stages:
1. Initial haemodynamic parameters and oxygen transport function of the patient's blood
before anaesthesia were determined;
2. After tracheal intubation;
3. Before the CPB;
4. After the CPB;
5. The post-operative period until the patient is transferred to the specialized
department.
Before induction into anaesthesia, haemodynamic monitoring was started on admission to the
operating theatre using a Nihon Kohden monitor (Japan). The right radial artery was
catheterised for invasive monitoring of systemic arterial pressure and arterial blood
sampling, and a catheter was then inserted into the central jugular vein (under ultrasound
machine control) and guided into the right atrium for mixed venous blood sampling.
Cardiac stroke volume was determined by transthoracic echocardiography (CS=end diastolic
volume - end systolic volume). Cardiac output (CO=CS x heart rate), cardiac index (CI=CO/body
surface area) were determined. the investigators determined blood oxygen content using the
formula CaO2 (arterial ABB) and CvO2 (central mixed venous ABB) = [(1.34 × Hb × SO2) + (PO2 ×
0.031)] / 100. Arteriovenous difference = CaO2-CvO2. Oxygen delivery was determined using the
formula (DO2 = CI* CaO2). Oxygen consumption (VO2 = Cardiac index (CI)*AVD or VO2 = CO ×
(CaO2 - CvO2) ~ CO × Hb × 1.34 × (SaO2 - SvO2) / 100).
In the second stage, after tracheal intubation, indirect calorimetry was used to determine
VO2, energy expenditure during anaesthesia using a Spirometry device (Oxford, UK), which was
connected to an endotracheal tube and continuously showed oxygen demand and energy
expenditure. A transesophageal echocardiography sensor was used to determine cardiac output.
Additionally, the cardiac output was determined by Fick's formula. The same tests (cardiac
output, cardiac index, consumption, oxygen delivery, energy expenditure) were performed in
the third and fourth stages of anaesthesia. In the last stage, the consumption of muscle
relaxants and opioid analgesics was calculated to assess the pharmaco-efficiency of
anaesthetics. The time of extubation and the time of transfer of the patient to the
specialized department were determined.
All patients continued antihypertensive medication both before and on the day of surgery to
prevent the development of withdrawal syndrome and to reduce the risk of perioperative
myocardial ischaemia.