Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
cognitive function assessed by The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) |
The MoCA is a 1-page test that measures several cognitive domains (visual perception, executive skills, language, attention, memory and orientation). The MoCA score ranges from 0 to 30 (30 = best) and was chosen for its relatively high sensitivity for mild cognitive impairment. |
Before the intervention |
|
Primary |
cognitive function assessed by The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) |
The MoCA is a 1-page test that measures several cognitive domains (visual perception, executive skills, language, attention, memory and orientation). The MoCA score ranges from 0 to 30 (30 = best) and was chosen for its relatively high sensitivity for mild cognitive impairment. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Primary |
cognitive function assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) |
MMSE using the Chinese version revised by Zhang Mingyuan, the scale includes 30 items, including orientation, instantaneous memory, attention, computation, recall, language and visuospatial. The MMSE score ranges from 0 to 30 (30=best). |
Before the intervention |
|
Primary |
cognitive function assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) |
MMSE using the Chinese version revised by Zhang Mingyuan, the scale includes 30 items, including orientation, instantaneous memory, attention, computation, recall, language and visuospatial. The MMSE score ranges from 0 to 30 (30=best). |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
MRI--T1-weighted structure imaging |
For the T1 MRI images, we first performed quality control using CAT12 to exclude subjects with quality scores lower than "B". Next, we used the recon-all command of FreeSurfer 6.0.0 for brain extraction, tissue segmentation, cortical reconstruction, and brain region labeling for each subject's brain images. We extracted the thickness, surface area, volume for cortical structures, and volume of subcortical structures in different brain regions based on the DK+Aseg parcellation template. Finally, the brain images of each subject were nonlinearly aligned to the MNI152 template using ANTs alignment toolkit for subsequent analysis of BOLD fMRI and DWI images. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
MRI--T1-weighted structure imaging |
For the T1 MRI images, we first performed quality control using CAT12 to exclude subjects with quality scores lower than "B". Next, we used the recon-all command of FreeSurfer 6.0.0 for brain extraction, tissue segmentation, cortical reconstruction, and brain region labeling for each subject's brain images. We extracted the thickness, surface area, volume for cortical structures, and volume of subcortical structures in different brain regions based on the DK+Aseg parcellation template. Finally, the brain images of each subject were nonlinearly aligned to the MNI152 template using ANTs alignment toolkit for subsequent analysis of BOLD fMRI and DWI images. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
MRI--resting functional MRI (rfMRI) imaging |
We used the alignment results of the T1-weighted image of each subject to transform the resting-state images into MNI152 space , and calculated the functional connectivity between all brain regions, as well as the ALFF, fALFF mean values for each brain region according to the DK+Aseg partitioning template. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
MRI--resting functional MRI (rfMRI) imaging |
We used the alignment results of the T1-weighted image of each subject to transform the resting-state images into MNI152 space , and calculated the functional connectivity between all brain regions, as well as the ALFF, fALFF mean values for each brain region according to the DK+Aseg partitioning template. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
MRI--diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). |
For DWI images, we mainly used the FSL toolkit for processing. First, the b0 images of each subject were aligned with the T1 images, followed by eddy correction and head motion correction, and detection and replacement of outliers. Next, we used the DK+Aseg parcellation template for probabilistic fiber tracking of DWI images for each subject, and finally generated a probabilistic white matter connectivity matrix for each brain region for subsequent extraction of graph theoretical metrics. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
MRI--diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). |
For DWI images, we mainly used the FSL toolkit for processing. First, the b0 images of each subject were aligned with the T1 images, followed by eddy correction and head motion correction, and detection and replacement of outliers. Next, we used the DK+Aseg parcellation template for probabilistic fiber tracking of DWI images for each subject, and finally generated a probabilistic white matter connectivity matrix for each brain region for subsequent extraction of graph theoretical metrics. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
memory function assessed by AVLT |
Auditory Verbal Learning Test(AVLT)to rate immediate (sum of words recalled on the 5 learning trials) and delayed episodic verbal memory. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
memory function assessed by AVLT |
Auditory Verbal Learning Test(AVLT)to rate immediate (sum of words recalled on the 5 learning trials) and delayed episodic verbal memory. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
memory function assessed by LMT |
Logic memory test (LMT): which assesses memory for brief passages, similar to newspaper stories. Subjects were assessed on immediate recall and 30 minute interval for delayed recall, according to standard practice. Subjects were not instructed in advance that they would be re-tested on the story after a delay of 30 minutes. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
memory function assessed by LMT |
Logic memory test (LMT): which assesses memory for brief passages, similar to newspaper stories. Subjects were assessed on immediate recall and 30 minute interval for delayed recall, according to standard practice. Subjects were not instructed in advance that they would be re-tested on the story after a delay of 30 minutes. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
executive function assessed by TMT-A |
The trail marking test A (TMT-A): The TMT-A consisted of a standardized page on which the numbers 1 to 25 are scattered within circles, and the participants were asked to connect the numbers in order as quickly as possible. A maximum time of 300 seconds was allowed before discontinuing the test. Direct scores of TMT-A were the time in seconds taken to complete task. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
executive function assessed by TMT-A |
The trail marking test A (TMT-A): The TMT-A consisted of a standardized page on which the numbers 1 to 25 are scattered within circles, and the participants were asked to connect the numbers in order as quickly as possible. A maximum time of 300 seconds was allowed before discontinuing the test. Direct scores of TMT-A were the time in seconds taken to complete task. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
executive function assessed by DSST |
Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST): The DSST was used to assess visual search, and perceptual and graphomotor speed. The number of correct substitutions during a 90-second interval was used as the score. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
executive function assessed by DSST |
Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST): The DSST was used to assess visual search, and perceptual and graphomotor speed. The number of correct substitutions during a 90-second interval was used as the score. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
concentration function assessed by DST |
Digit Span Test (DST): including digit span forwards (DSF) and digit span backwards (DSB) |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
concentration function assessed by DST |
Digit Span Test (DST): including digit span forwards (DSF) and digit span backwards (DSB) |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by the Barthel index |
Barthel index:The main aim is to establish degree of independence from any help, physical or verbal, however minor and for whatever reason. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by the Barthel index |
Barthel index:The main aim is to establish degree of independence from any help, physical or verbal, however minor and for whatever reason. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L |
European quality of life-5 dimensions with 5 level (EQ-5D-5L): The descriptive system of the EQ-5D comprises five dimensions: mobility (MO), self-care (SC), usual activities (UA), pain/discomfort (PD), and anxiety/depression (AD); each dimension is described at five levels, corresponding roughly to no, slight, moderate, severe, and extreme problems. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L |
European quality of life-5 dimensions with 5 level (EQ-5D-5L): The descriptive system of the EQ-5D comprises five dimensions: mobility (MO), self-care (SC), usual activities (UA), pain/discomfort (PD), and anxiety/depression (AD); each dimension is described at five levels, corresponding roughly to no, slight, moderate, severe, and extreme problems. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by IADL |
The Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale (IADL): IADL is an appropriate instrument to assess independent living skills. The instrument is most useful for identifying how a person is functioning at the present time, and to identify improvement or deterioration over time. There are eight domains of function measured with the Lawton IADL scale. Women are scored on all 8 areas of function; historically, for men, the areas of food preparation, housekeeping, laundering are excluded. Clients are scored according to their highest level of functioning in that category. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by IADL |
The Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale (IADL): IADL is an appropriate instrument to assess independent living skills. The instrument is most useful for identifying how a person is functioning at the present time, and to identify improvement or deterioration over time. There are eight domains of function measured with the Lawton IADL scale. Women are scored on all 8 areas of function; historically, for men, the areas of food preparation, housekeeping, laundering are excluded. Clients are scored according to their highest level of functioning in that category. A summary score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) for women, and 0 through 5 for men. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by PSMS |
Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS): To assess functional abilities in elderly patients. The format the PSMS is first a six item based on the ADL and then eight-items based on the IADL scale. A 5-point scale for responses ranges from total independence to total dependence. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by PSMS |
Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS): To assess functional abilities in elderly patients. The format the PSMS is first a six item based on the ADL and then eight-items based on the IADL scale. A 5-point scale for responses ranges from total independence to total dependence. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by SF-36 |
The short-form 36 item health survey (SF-36): The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of life assessed by SF-36 |
The short-form 36 item health survey (SF-36): The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
social support assessed by SSRS |
Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS): SSRS developed by Xiao was utilized to measure social support. The 10-item scale consists of 3 dimensions including objective support, subjective support and availability. Higher scores indicate higher levels of social support. The scale has presented impressive validity and reliability in Chinese population. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
social support assessed by SSRS |
Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS): SSRS developed by Xiao was utilized to measure social support. The 10-item scale consists of 3 dimensions including objective support, subjective support and availability. Higher scores indicate higher levels of social support. The scale has presented impressive validity and reliability in Chinese population. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of sleep assessed by PSQI |
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI): Sleep quality was assessed using the Chinese version of the PSQI, which is composed of 19 items classified into seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction during the past month. Each component is weighted from 0 to 3, generating one global score ranging from 0 to 21. The higher score the poorer sleep quality. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
quality of sleep assessed by PSQI |
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI): Sleep quality was assessed using the Chinese version of the PSQI, which is composed of 19 items classified into seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction during the past month. Each component is weighted from 0 to 3, generating one global score ranging from 0 to 21. The higher score the poorer sleep quality. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|
Secondary |
emotion assessed by GDS-15 |
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15): The short form including 15 items. Items represent characteristics of depression in the elderly in the affective (e.g., sadness, apathy, crying) and cognitive domains (e.g., thoughts of hopelessness, helplessness, guilt, worthlessness. Higher GDS scores are indicative of more severe depression. |
Before the intervention |
|
Secondary |
emotion assessed by GDS-15 |
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15): The short form including 15 items. Items represent characteristics of depression in the elderly in the affective (e.g., sadness, apathy, crying) and cognitive domains (e.g., thoughts of hopelessness, helplessness, guilt, worthlessness. Higher GDS scores are indicative of more severe depression. |
6 weeks after the intervention |
|