Migraine Headache Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy of Memantine Compared With Sodium Valproate in the Prophylactic Treatment of Episodic Migraine.
Verified date | May 2024 |
Source | Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Migraine is one of the three most disabling diseases worldwide. Constituted by recurrent episodes of headache, characterized by unilateral location, throbbing character, moderate or severe intensity, worsening with physical activity, and association with nausea or photophobia and/or phonophobia. There are two types of drug treatment: abortifacient and prophylactic. The American Academy of Neurology classifies sodium valproate as level A; however, some patients do not obtain a satisfactory response rate and/or have adverse effects. Therefore, the search for new pharmacological treatments continues. In 2015, a double-blind, randomized clinical trial with a placebo was carried out to assess Memantine's efficacy in the prophylactic treatment of migraine without aura, which reported a reduction of 2.3 migraine attacks per month compared to the placebo group. Memantine could be a new effective treatment alternative, which is why we will compare the efficacy of Memantine against sodium valproate as a prophylactic migraine treatment. Main objective: To compare the efficacy of Memantine at a rate of 20mg divided into two doses a day against sodium valproate (VPA) at a rate of 1000mg divided into two doses a day prophylactic treatment of migraine for three months. Study design: a prospective controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Inclusion criteria: Men and women aged 18 to 65 years with a diagnosis at least one year before the study must present at least 2 to 8 migraine attacks per month and less than 15 days with headache per month, which should not be receiving prophylactic treatment for migraine and sign an informed consent Sample size calculation and statistical analysis: It is calculated using the normal distribution model, where the recommended sample size is 196 participants. Since a pilot study will be conducted, 10% of the sample size will be taken to make it representative, a sample size of 20 participants is decided for each group.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 33 |
Est. completion date | January 15, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | January 15, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Men and women from 18 to 65 years old. 2. Diagnosis of migraine according to the ICHD-III of the IHS at least one year before the study. 3. You must have at least 4-14 migraine attacks per month. 4. Not receiving prophylactic treatment for migraine 5. Sign informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating patients. 2. Patients with another type of non-migraine headache. 3. Allergy to Sodium Valproate and/or Memantine 4. Being a carrier of systemic disease (infectious, immunological, or metabolic processes) or cardiovascular (myocardial, coronary, or valvular disease) prevents their participation in the study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Mexico | Hospital Central Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto | San Luis Potosi |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí |
Mexico,
Bille B. A 40-year follow-up of school children with migraine. Cephalalgia. 1997 Jun;17(4):488-91; discussion 487. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1704488.x. — View Citation
GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Erratum In: Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):e44. — View Citation
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available. — View Citation
Linde M, Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, McCrory DC. Valproate (valproic acid or sodium valproate or a combination of the two) for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 24;2013(6):CD010611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010611. — View Citation
Noruzzadeh R, Modabbernia A, Aghamollaii V, Ghaffarpour M, Harirchian MH, Salahi S, Nikbakht N, Noruzi N, Tafakhori A. Memantine for Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine Without Aura: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Headache. 2016 Jan;56(1):95-103. doi: 10.1111/head.12732. Epub 2015 Dec 6. — View Citation
Schwedt TJ. Preventive Therapy of Migraine. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018 Aug;24(4, Headache):1052-1065. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000635. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | To Compare the Adverse Events in the Use of Memantine in Comparision With Valpoate in the Episodic Migraine Treatment. | The number of adverse events and the safety of memantine and valproate. Evaluated according to CTCAE v5.0. There were several side effects, but no one had life-threatening or serious side effects. | Three months | |
Primary | Reduction in Days of Headache Pain With Treatment of Memantine or Valproate in the Preventive Management of Episodic Migraine. | In a double-blind clinical trial, we compared two active drugs (mamantine vs. valproate) three months after initiation, looking for changes in the average number of days of migraine attack presentation per month and comparing the three months before with the three months after treatment administration with two active drugs. | Three months before treatment (Pretreatment), three months after initiating treatment (post-treatment) | |
Primary | The Change in the Intensity of the Pain in a Migraine Attack Will be Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). | The possible reduction in the average on the visual analog scale (0-10) comparing three months before and after three months of the treatment with both drugs. We measured both arms of the study.
0 means without pain. 10 means the worst possible pain in the concept of the patient. |
Three months previous and three months after the treatment. | |
Primary | The Migraine Disability Assessment MIDAS Scale Will Measure Before and After the Treatment to Improve the Quality of Life in Both Groups After Three Months of Treatment. | To compare the average of Memantine against the group that receives Valproate before and after starting preventive treatment. Using the Migraine Disability Assessment scale (The score is the sum of days missed from work or school, days of housework missed, days of missed non-work activities, and days of work or school plus days of housework in which productivity in the last three months) to compare punctuation changes. The MIDAS score is divided into four degrees, the minimum score is 0 points, and the maximum score is 70. A higher value represents a higher difficulty to carry out a satisfactory lifestyle, and a score higher than 20 points already represents a high limitation to enjoying daily activities:
Grade I (0-5 points): Slight limitations and few patient treatment needs. Grade II (6-10 points): Moderate limitations and treatment needs. Grade III (11-20 points) and IV (21 or more points): Severe and significant punctuation treatment needs. |
Three months. | |
Secondary | Measure Changes in Weight With the Administration of Active Drugs. | To compare the average weight in both arms before and after Valproate and Memantine administration. The weight will be measured in kilograms, and the initial against the final will be compared. | Three months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04084314 -
Assessment of Prolonged Safety and tOLerability of in Migraine Patients in a Long-term OpeN-label Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05943457 -
Vitamin K2 Supplementation in Adult Episodic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01211145 -
Zomig - Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache in Adolescents
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00530517 -
A Study on the Usability of the Needle-free Intraject® System in Adult Patients During Acute Migraine Attack
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00898677 -
Rizatriptan 5 mg and 10 mg, Sumatriptan 100 mg, and Placebo Comparison Study (0462-030)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06459635 -
Migraine Attack Pain Phase Prediction Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT03971071 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Adults With Medication Overuse Headache
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02706015 -
Cefaliv® Compared to Neosaldina® in the Treatment of Migraine Attacks
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02375789 -
Intranasal Cooling for Symptomatic Relief of Migraine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02518464 -
Ticagrelor Therapy for RefrACTORy Migraine Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00391755 -
A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Rozerem in Migraine Headaches
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03401346 -
Bioavailability of DHE Administered by I123 POD Device, IV Injection, and Migranal Nasal Spray in Healthy Adults
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05085483 -
Ketone for Migraine Prevention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01604785 -
Low-dose Propofol for Pediatric Migraine
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00804973 -
Study in Participants With Acute Migraines Headaches
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03341689 -
Psilocybin for the Treatment of Migraine Headache
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01630044 -
Neurostimulation Device for Treatment of Migraine Headache
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00285402 -
Efficacy and Safety Clinical Trial of Intranasal AST-726 for the Prevention of Migraine
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00203255 -
Clinical Study Examining Use of an Over-the-Counter Supplement for the Prevention of Menstrually-Associated Migraine Headache
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06046508 -
Migraine With Aura and Patent Foramen Ovale: Identification of Biomarkers to Select Patients In Whom Intervention Would Be Beneficial (MANET)
|