Efficacy and Safety Study for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding

Metrorrhagia Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, 7 Cycle Duration (196 Days), Phase 3 Study of Oral Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest Tablets for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00307801
• Other study ID #: 91470
• Secondary ID: 2005-004340-3230
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: March 27, 2006
• Last updated: December 8, 2014
• Start date: February 2006
• Est. completion date: May 2008

Study information

• Verified date: December 2014
• Source: Bayer
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO)Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug ControlGermany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical DevicesFinland: Finnish Medicines AgencyHungary: National Institute of PharmacyPoland: Ministry of HealthSweden: Medical Products AgencyUnited Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory AgencyAustralia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods AdministrationUkraine: State Pharmacological Center - Ministry of Health
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the study drug is safe and effective in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Description:

The study has previously been posted by Schering AG, Germany. Schering AG, Germany has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany. Bayer HealthCare AG, Germany is the sponsor of the trial.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 231
• Est. completion date: May 2008
• Est. primary completion date: May 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Women 18 years or older

• And with a diagnosis of dysfunctional uterine bleeding without organic pathology

• And with at least one of the following symptoms: prolonged, frequent or excessive bleeding.

Exclusion Criteria:

• The use of steroidal oral contraceptives, or any drug that could alter oral contraception metabolism will be prohibited during the study.

• Women with a history of endometrial ablation or dilatation and curettage within 2 months prior to study start will be excluded.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Metrorrhagia
• Uterine Hemorrhage

Intervention

Drug:
• Estradiol valerate/Dienogest (Natazia, Qlaira, BAY86-5027)
1 pill per day taken orally over 7 cycles of 28 pills per cycle
• Placebo
1 pill per day taken orally over 7 cycles of 28 pills per cycle

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Australia	Private Practice Dr. Ian Fraser	Ashfield	New South Wales
Australia	King Edward Memorial Hospital	Subiaco	Western Australia
Czech Republic	Gynekologicka ambulance Vanda Horejsi, MD	Ceske Budejovice
Czech Republic	Center for Clinical& Basic Research	Pardubice
Czech Republic	Gynekologicko-poradnicka ambulance Dr. Hlavackova	Pisek
Czech Republic	Lekarsky dum Praha 7 a.s.Gynekologicka ambulance Dr. Jenicek	Praha 7
Finland	Adenova Lääkärikeskus Oy	Espoo
Finland	Terveystalo Lahti	Lahti
Finland	Koskiklinikka	Tampere
Finland	Ylioppilaiden terveydenhoitosäätiö, Turku	Turku
Germany	emovis GmbH	Berlin
Germany	ClinPharm International GmbH	Dresden	Sachsen
Germany	Praxis Hr. Dr. K. Greven	Hannover	Niedersachsen
Germany	Praxis Hr. Dr. U. Kohoutek	Karlsruhe	Baden-Württemberg
Germany	Praxis Hr. Dr. S. Schönian	Rheinstetten	Baden-Württemberg
Hungary	University of Semmelweis	Budapest
Hungary	Selya Janos Hospital	Komarom
Hungary	Borsod-Abauj-Zemplen County Hospital	Miskolc
Netherlands	Medisch Spectrum Twente, Locatie Ariensplein	Enschede
Netherlands	PreCare Trial & Recruitment	Geleen
Netherlands	Menox BV	Nijmegen
Poland	Poliklinika Ginekologiczna- Poloznicza	Bialystok
Poland	Instytut Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki	Lodz
Poland	SPSK nr 1	Lublin
Poland	Szpital Kliniczny nr 3	Poznan
Poland	CSK MSWiA	Warszawa
Sweden	Skånes Universitetssjukhus	Lund
Sweden	Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Huddinge	Stockholm
Sweden	Akademiska Sjukhuset	Uppsala
Ukraine	Dept. of obstetrics and gynaecology	Kiev
Ukraine	Instr. of Pediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynecology	Kiev
Ukraine	Kyiv Medical Academy of Postdyploma Education	Kiev
Ukraine	Lviv Regional Center Perinatal Center	Lviv
United Kingdom	Bridge House Medical Centre	Cheadle	Cheshire
United Kingdom	Luton & Dunstable Hospital	Luton
United Kingdom	MeDiNova Research	Northwood

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Bayer

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Australia,  Czech Republic,  Finland,  Germany,  Hungary,  Netherlands,  Poland,  Sweden,  Ukraine,  United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (5)

Fraser IS, Jensen J, Schaefers M, Mellinger U, Parke S, Serrani M. Normalization of blood loss in women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated with an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate/dienogest. Contraception. 2012 Aug;86(2):96-101. doi: 10 — View Citation

Fraser IS, Parke S, Mellinger U, Machlitt A, Serrani M, Jensen J. Effective treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding without organic cause: pooled analysis of two multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of oestradi — View Citation

Fraser IS, Römer T, Parke S, Zeun S, Mellinger U, Machlitt A, Jensen JT. Effective treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding with an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial. H — View Citation

Fraser IS, Zeun S, Parke S, Wilke B, Junge W, Serrani M. Improving the objective quality of large-scale clinical trials for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: experience from 2 multi-center, randomized trials. Reprod Sci. 2013 Jul;20(7):745-54. doi: 10. — View Citation

Wasiak R, Filonenko A, Vanness DJ, Wittrup-Jensen KU, Stull DE, Siak S, Fraser I. Impact of estradiol-valerate/dienogest on work productivity and activities of daily living in European and Australian women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Int J Womens Healt — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Proportion of Participants With no Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) Symptoms	At least 6, up to 8 criteria to be met in complete response during 90-day period: no bleeding episodes(BE) >7 days, no >4 BE, no BE with blood loss (menstrual blood loss, MBL) =80 mL, no >1 BE increase from baseline, no increase from baseline in individual patient's total number of bleeding days and total number of bleeding days not >24 days. Additionally, for subjects included with prolonged bleeding: decrease between maximum duration during run-in and efficacy =2 days excessive bleeding: MBL associated with each episode decreased by =50% from average of qualifying episodes during run-in.	Efficacy phase was defined as a 90-day period under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Proportion of Participants Cured From Prolonged Bleeding	Prolonged bleeding: 2 or more bleeding episodes, each lasting 8 or more days. Cure from prolonged bleeding: no bleeding episodes lasting more than 7 days and the decrease between maximum duration during run-in and maximum duration during the efficacy phase was at least 2 days.	Efficacy phase was defined as a 90-day period under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Proportion of Participants Cured From Excessive Bleeding	Excessive bleeding:>=2 bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume (MBL) of >=80 mL in 90-day period, assessed by alkaline hematin method. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. Cure from excessive bleeding: MBL in each episode <80 mL + blood loss volume associated with each bleeding episode is decrease of =50% from average of qualifying bleeding episodes (with blood loss volume =80 mL per episode during run-in)	Efficacy phase was defined as a 90-day period under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Proportion of Participants Cured From Frequent Bleeding	Frequent bleeding: greater than 5 bleeding episodes, with a minimum of 20 bleeding days overall. Cure from frequent bleeding: no more than 4 bleeding episodes and the total number of bleeding days did not exceed 24 days and no increase from baseline in an individual patient's total number of bleeding days occurred	Efficacy phase was defined as a 90-day period under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84	According to the investigator's global assessment scale "improved" was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and "not improved" was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and patient interview were used as sources for the assessment at day 84 compared with admission to study data.	From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Investigator's Global Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196	According to the investigator's global assessment scale "improved" was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and "not improved" was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Central laboratory data, physical examination, e-diary data, and patient interview were used as sources for the assessment at day 196 compared with admission to study data.	From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 84	According to the patient's global assessment scale "improved" was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and "not improved" was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Patients assessed the overall improvement at day 84 compared with admission to the study condition.	From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Proportion of Participants With Improvement in the Patient's Overall Assessment Scale at Treatment Day 196	According to the patient´s global assessment scale "improved" was defined as being classified as 'very much improved', 'much improved', or 'improved' and "not improved" was defined as being classified as 'no change', 'worse', 'much worse', 'very much worse', or 'not assessed'. Patients assessed the overall improvement at day 196 compared with admission to the study condition.	From baseline (visit 5, day 1) up to treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for All Participants to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment	Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days under treatment. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss after treatment.	Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 1	Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method after patients were on treatment for one cycle. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction.	Cycle 1 = 28 days (one cycle)	No
Secondary	Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 3	Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method after patients were on treatment for 3 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction.	Cycle 3 = 28 days (one cycle)	No
Secondary	Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for All Participants at Cycle 7	Menstrual blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method after patients were on treatment for 7 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction.	Cycle 7 = 28 days (one cycle)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment.	Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) for the 90 days before treatment (ie, run-in phase) and for the 90 days under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in blood loss while under treatment compared to before treatment.	Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 1.	Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) after participants were on treatment for one cycle. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction.	Cycle 1 = 28 days (one cycle)	No
Secondary	Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 3.	Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) after participants were on treatment for 3 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction.	Cycle 3 = 28 days (one cycle)	No
Secondary	Menstrual Blood Loss Volume for Participants With Excessive Bleeding at Cycle 7.	Blood loss volume as assessed by the alkaline hematin method for participants with excessive bleeding (2 or more bleeding episodes each with blood loss volume of 80 ml or more during the run-in phase) after participants were on treatment for 7 cycles. This spectrophotometrical method measures hemoglobin (Hb) in fixed amount of alkaline solution, taken from pool of solution in which materials (used sanitary protection) to be tested have been macerated for Hb extraction.	Cycle 7 = 28 days (one cycle)	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Episodes to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment	A bleeding episode is characterized by the following: • Bleeding for at least 2 days • Bleeding days can be separated by no more than 1 bleeding-free day • An episode stops with 2 consecutive bleeding-free days. The number of episodes was determined for the 90 days before treatment and for the 90 days under treatment. negative value indicates a reduction from baseline in the number of episodes while under treatment.	Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Number of Bleeding Days to the Reference Period of 90 Days Under Treatment	A bleeding day is a day on which sanitary protection is required. The number of bleeding days was determined for the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and for 90 days while under treatment. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of bleeding days while under treatment compared to baseline.	Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Number of Sanitary Protection Used at 90 Days of Treatment	The number of total sanitary protection items used during the 90 days before treatment (baseline) and those used during the 90 days while under treatment was determined. A negative value indicates a reduction in the number of sanitary protection items used while under treatment compared to baseline.	Baseline and reference period of 90 days under treatment. For patients who completed up to day 6 of treatment cycle 7, the efficacy phase started on the first day of treatment cycle 4, and continued through day 6 of treatment cycle 7	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 84	Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 84.	Baseline (visit 5) and treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration at Treatment Day 196	Hemoglobin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hemoglobin from baseline at treatment day 196.	Baseline (visit 5) and treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Treatment Day 196.	Hematocrit was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in hematocrit from baseline at treatment day 196.	Baseline (visit 5) and treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 84	Ferritin was measured before treatment and after 84 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in ferritin from baseline at treatment day 84.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Ferritin Concentration at Treatment Day 196	Ferritin was measured before treatment and after 196 days under treatment. A positive value indicates an increase in ferritin from baseline at treatment day 196.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 84.	The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum 132. The higher the score, the better the well-being of the patient. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) Score at Treatment Day 196.	The PGWBI questionnaire consisted of 22 questions that were answered using a 6-grade Likert scale. The minimum overall score was 22 and the maximum 132. The higher the score, the better the well-being of the patient. The observation phase was the last 4 weeks. The following 6 dimensions were derived from the questionnaire: anxiety, depressed mood, positive well-being, self-control, health, and vitality and the highest possible scores were 30, 18, 24, 18, 18, and 24, respectively.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 84	The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the patients´sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum values are 19 and 133.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire (MFSQ) Score at Treatment Day 196	The MFSQ was designed to measure aspects of female sexuality and asked about the patients´sexual experience during the last 4 weeks. Higher scores represent higher, more complete, or better integrated levels of female sexual function. Minimum and maximum values are 19 and 133.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 84	The health state classification of the EQ-5D comprises 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a score of .594.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensional (EQ-5D) Score at Treatment Day 196	The health state classification of the EQ-5D comprises 5 questions addressing mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Patients were asked to indicate their current health state by ticking the most appropriate of 3 statements about each of the questions (ie, no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The best possible answers were (1,1,1,1,1), which equals a valuation score of 1.0. The worst possible answers were (3,3,3,3,3), which equals a score of .594.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 84.	The visual analogue scale (ie, "thermometer") had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Patients rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked "your own health state today" to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D Score at Treatment Day 196.	The visual analogue scale (ie, "thermometer") had endpoints of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. Patients rated their current health state by drawing a line from the box marked "your own health state today" to the appropriate point on the thermometer scale.	Baseline (visit 5, day 1) and treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 84.	The patient was asked if there was any change in her employment status in the last 12 weeks and was asked to specify the number of hours per week. The proportion of participants with such changes are displayed.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Change in the Employment Status) at Treatment Day 196.	The patient was asked if there was any change in her employment status in the last 12 weeks and was asked to specify the number of hours per week. The proportion of participants with such changes are displayed.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked how many days and hours she missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of her problems associated with her DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Days Missed From Work) at Treatment Day 196	The patient was asked how many days and hours she missed from work during the past 12 weeks because of her problems associated with her DUB, not including the time missed to participate in this study.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 84.	The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her productivity while she was working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her work and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from working.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Productivity While Working) at Treatment Day 196.	The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her productivity while she was working during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her work and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from working.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her ability to do her regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her daily activities and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from doing her daily activities.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Regular Daily Activities) at Treatment Day 196.	The patient was asked to rate on a scale of 0 to 10, how much her DUB affected her ability to do her regular daily activities, other than work at a job, during the past 12 weeks, where 0 represented that her DUB had no effect on her daily activities and 10 represented that her DUB completely prevented her from doing her daily activities.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with any unscheduled outpatient visits are displayed.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit at Hospital) at Treatment Day 196	The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a hospital because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with any unscheduled outpatient visits are displayed.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with such visits are displayed.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Unscheduled Outpatient Visit to Physician) at Treatment Day 196	The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled outpatient visits to a physician (non-hospital medical care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, not including visits that were due to her participation in this study. She was also asked to indicate the number of visits. The proportion of participants with such visits are displayed.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures are displayed.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Additional Unscheduled Procedures) at Treatment Day 196	The patient was asked if she had any unscheduled procedures (eg, laparoscopy, laboratory tests, ultrasound) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks. The proportion of participants with such procedures are displayed.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked if she received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and if yes, how many hours per week. The proportion of participants with such services are displayed.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Received Ambulatory Services) at Treatment Day 196	The patient was asked if she received ambulatory services (eg, home help, child care) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and if yes, how many hours per week. The proportion of participants with such services are displayed.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked to specify her out-of pocket expenses because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication (the name of the medication, the number of packages, and the cost per package), co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with no out-of pocket expenses are displayed.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (no Out-of-pocket Expenses) at Treatment Day 196	The patient was asked to specify her out-of pocket expenses because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, including over-the-counter medication (the name of the medication, the number of packages, and the cost per package), co-payments due to prescribed medication, and costs to travel to and from medical appointments. The proportion of participants with no out-of pocket expenses are displayed.	Treatment day 196	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 84	The patient was asked if she had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and to specify the cost. The proportion of participants with such treatment are displayed.	Treatment day 84	No
Secondary	Resource Use Assessment by Use of a Self Administered Questionnaire (Not Have Any Medical Treatment) at Treatment Day 196	The patient was asked if she had any medical treatment (eg, prescribed medication, other treatment) because of her DUB during the past 12 weeks, and to specify the cost. The proportion of participants with such treatment are displayed.	Treatment day 196	No

External Links

•   Click here and search for drug information provided by the FDA.
•   Click here and search for information on any recalls, market or product safety alerts by the FDA which might have occurred with this product.
•   Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer Healthcare products conducted in Europe
•   Click here to find results for studies related to Bayer Healthcare products.