Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Clinical Trial
— SELECTOfficial title:
The High-Dose Aldesleukin (IL-2) "Select" Trial: A Trial Designed to Prospectively Validate Predictive Models of Response to High Dose IL-2 Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Verified date | June 2023 |
Source | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
High-dose interleukin 2 (Proleukin, Novartis) (IL-2) is approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic kidney cancer and is a standard treatment of this disease. At the present time, IL-2 is the only therapy for kidney cancer that can produce a remission of disease that lasts after treatment is completed. However, most patients who receive IL-2 do not benefit and all patients experience potentially dangerous side effects. Recent research has suggested that certain patients may respond better to IL-2 than others. The Cytokine Working Group is currently conducting a clinical trial that aims to identify and confirm this research and narrow the application of IL-2 to those patients most likely to benefit.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 123 |
Est. completion date | October 31, 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | October 31, 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must have histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma that is metastatic or unresectable. - If patients have measurable disease restricted to a solitary lesion, its neoplastic nature should be confirmed by cytology/histology. - Patients must provide access to tissue blocks containing adequate tumor for interpretation and analysis. - Patients must have measurable disease. - Patients must have good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1; Karnofsky PS 100-80%). - Patients must have adequate organ function. - Patients must have no contraindication of vasopressor agents. - Patients must be = 18 years of age. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who have received systemic therapy for metastatic disease. - Patients with organ allografts. - Patients who require or are likely to require systemic corticosteroid therapy for intercurrent illness. - Patients with any significant medical disease other than the malignancy (e.g. COPD, patients with ascites or pleural effusions), which in the opinion of the investigator would significantly increase the risk of immunotherapy. - Patients with a history of another malignancy within the past 5 years other than surgically cured non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma-in-situ or Stage I carcinoma of the cervix. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | City of Hope National Medical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Indiana University, Loyola University, Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, Providence Cancer Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, University of Cincinnati, University of Pittsburgh, University of Virginia, Vanderbilt University, Wayne State University |
United States,
Atkins M, Regan M, McDermott D, Mier J, Stanbridge E, Youmans A, Febbo P, Upton M, Lechpammer M, Signoretti S. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of interleukin 2 therapy for renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3714-21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2019. — View Citation
McDermott DF, Cheng SC, Signoretti S, Margolin KA, Clark JI, Sosman JA, Dutcher JP, Logan TF, Curti BD, Ernstoff MS, Appleman L, Wong MK, Khushalani NI, Oleksowicz L, Vaishampayan UN, Mier JW, Panka DJ, Bhatt RS, Bailey AS, Leibovich BC, Kwon ED, Kabbinav — View Citation
McDermott DF. Update on the application of interleukin-2 in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Jan 15;13(2 Pt 2):716s-720s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1872. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | VHL Genotype Status | VHL genotype status will be determined based on establish methods. | Determined from baseline sample. | |
Primary | Objective Response in ISM Good Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by investigator assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate in ISM Poor Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on treatment on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate (Independent Assessment) | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks.. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Overall Survival | Overall survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from treatment start to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact. | Participants were followed for survival up to 7 years. | |
Secondary | 3-Year Progression-Free Survival Rate | 3-year progression-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients absent death or progression based on WHO criteria by 3 years since time of treatment start. PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 3 y. | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by MSKCC Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by UCLA SANI Score | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by Tumor Type | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by Clear Cell Histology Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Response status was confirmed by an independent assessment of radiographs. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by CA-9 Score (CAIX Classification) | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by PD-L1 Tumor | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by B7-H3 Tumor | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Objective Response Rate by CA-9 SNP | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). | |
Secondary | Progression-Free Survival | Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from treatment start to date of disease progression (PD) or death. Per WHO criteria: PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Median survival follow-up was X months (95% CI: ). |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00930033 -
Clinical Trial to Assess the Importance of Nephrectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05863351 -
Focused Radiation Versus Systemic Therapy for Kidney Cancer Patients With Limited Metastasis, SOAR Study
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06284564 -
A Phase II Study Bolstering Outcomes by Optimizing Immunotherapy Strategies With Evolocumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (BOOST-RCC)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00414765 -
Aldesleukin in Participants With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma or Metastatic Melanoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03149822 -
Study of Pembrolizumab and Cabozantinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03647878 -
Study of Cabozantinib as Monotherapy or in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Under Real-life Clinical Setting in 1st Line Treatment.
|
||
Completed |
NCT01517243 -
Phase II Study of Alternating Sunitinib and Temsirolimus
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03927248 -
PAC-1 for Treatment of Refractory, Metastatic Kidney Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02122003 -
Second Line Sorafenib After Pazopanib in Patients With RCC
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01182142 -
Study of Capecitabine in Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00630409 -
Phase II Clinical Trial of Gemcitabine and Doxil® for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04140526 -
Safety, PK and Efficacy of ONC-392 in Monotherapy and in Combination of Anti-PD-1 in Advanced Solid Tumors and NSCLC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04076787 -
Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Received First-Line Sunitinib
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04467021 -
Cancer and Blood Pressure Management, CARISMA Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05119335 -
A Study of NKT2152, a HIF2α Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02282579 -
Spanish Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapies After Pazopanib as First-line Therapy
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02071641 -
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Rechallenge in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01731158 -
Sequential Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT01342627 -
Sorafenib in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01274273 -
Study of Interleukin-2, Interferon-alpha and Bevacizumab in Metastatic Kidney Cancer
|
Phase 2 |