View clinical trials related to Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:This is a prospective multicenter cohort study, was designed to explore the prognostic value of ctDNA as a biomarker of disease response and recurrence or death in patients undergoing curative-intent surgical resection of Colorectal cancer liver metastasis.
To explore the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of triweekly cetuximab in combination with capecitabine as first-line maintenance treatment for KRAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-arm, a single-center, Phase 1b trial. Meanwhile, Exploring the maximum tolerant dose or recommended II research dose of triweekly cetuximab combined with a fixed dose of capecitabine using '3+3' dose climbing Phase I experiment.
By virtue of an increased strategic use of cytotoxic and biological agents, and more options for locoregional treatment, the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably in the past decades. The personalized approach to systemic treatment is further aided by the use of complementary molecular biomarkers. However, the evolutionary dynamics of mCRC, a disease harnessed by multiple adaptive genetic alterations towards its final stages, poses a particular challenge to single-sample biomarker analyses and standardized linear treatment protocols. The aim of the On-treatment biomarkers in metastatic ColorectAL cancer for Life (On-CALL) study is to generate further knowledge on the evolutionary progression of mCRC during treatment, and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic failure still seen in a substantial number of patients. The On-CALL study is a prospective, single-arm observational study. All patients diagnosed with synchronous mCRC treated with curative intent at Skåne University Hospital will be invited to participate. Clinical and histopathological data will be compiled at study entry. An individual tissue microarray block with samples from resected primary tumours and metastases representing the full extent of the tumour spread will be constructed for each patient. Blood samples will be drawn for biomarker analyses at multiple time points prior to, during and after systemic treatment. DNA sequencing of tumour tissue and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) will be performed to define the spatial clonal landscape in primary tumours and metastases, as well as over time.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and potential clinical benefits of ZN-c3 administered in combination with encorafenib and cetuximab in adult participants with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant colorectal cancer previously treated with one or two treatment regimens.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect and side effects of personalized cancer treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (bowel cancer). All patients included must have metastatic bowel cancer and receive or have received at least two lines of standard chemotherapy. The cancer must not be available for surgery with curative intent.
The goal of this exploratory phase I/II single-center clinical trial is to evaluate effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of Intravenous D-isoascorbic Acid (D-VC) With Arsenic Trioxide in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Exhausted Standard Therapy The main questions are to learn about effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of Intravenous D-isoascorbic Acid (D-VC) With Arsenic Trioxide. The study aims to: 1. Assess the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of D-isoascorbic acid (D-VC) with a single intravenous injection in the monotherapy regimen and in the sequential administration regimen with arsenic trioxide (ATO) in patients on standard therapy for advanced/metastatic malignancies (Phase I) 2. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-isoascorbic acid (D-VC) with repeated intravenous administration in the mode of sequential administration with arsenic trioxide (ATO) in patients who have exhausted standard therapy for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (Phase II) In phase I participants will receive single intravenous administration as monotherapy of D-isoascorbic acid (D-VC) with dose escalation (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 g/kg/day) and with arsenic trioxide (ATO). Patients who have satisfactorily tolerated the study drug in combination with arsenic trioxide (ATO) in a phase I study are transferred to a phase II clinical trial. To study the safety and efficacy of the study drug in phase II, D-VC after the administration of ATO will be implemented in 2 groups: Study group 1: ATO (at a dose of 0.15 mg / kg / day) after intravenous administration after 2 hours D-VC intravenously once a day at the maximum tolerated dose, determined at the end of phase I for at least 15 patients. Group 2 standard therapy: 15 patients. For the phase I researchers will compare laboratory tests (including clinical biochemistry and hematology), vital signs, clinical adverse events (diseases, symptoms and complaints) and other specific safety tests (for example, an electrocardiogram, ophthalmic examination) between groups. They will also measure the degree to which overt adverse reactions can be subjectively tolerated by the subject of the study. For the phase II researchers will compare degrees of tumor volume reduction on CT; objective response rate (ORR) based on BICR according to RECIST v1.1 between test and standard therapy groups. They will also continue evaluation of safety and tolerability of ATO + D-VC combination therapy.
The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of combining the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor sodium valproate (VPA) with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (panitumumab or cetuximab) maintenance in the first-line treatment of patients with RAS wild type metastatic CRC.
This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized parallel-group phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine as maintenance therapy following first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Approximately 40 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have achieved partial remission after completing 8 cycles of standard first-line chemotherapy (FOLFOX combined with Bevacizumab) but are still in un-resectable state will be assigned to 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine (Arm A) or Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine (Arm B). The study contains a safety lead-in phase in which the safety and efficacy of Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine will be assessed in approximately 20 patients. All patients from Arm A and Arm B will be treated until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, death, or other criteria for ending the study (whichever occurs earlier). The study will evaluate PFS, ORR, DCR, OS and safety.
The study will be conducted in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring a BRAFV600E mutation, to collect clinical data and biological samples to be used for research but also to gather real-world clinical data concerning the treatments and the survival outcomes in patients with this pathology.
The goal of this clinical trial is to detect the prognostic value of longitudinal monitoring circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for no evidence of disease (NED) status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and its utility in guiding therapeutic intervention. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Whether ctDNA monitoring could evaluate NED status ahead of normal radiologic monitoring. What about the concordance of evaluating NED status by ctDNA monitoring compared with normal radiologic monitoring? 2. Whether the patients with ctDNA positive status could benefit from early therapeutic intervention. Patients who receive any kinds of therapies with the aim of NED and are confirmed by clinical and radiologic examination will go through longitudinal ctDNA monitoring. According to the results of ctDNA monitoring, the patients will be divided into ctDNA positive group and ctDNA negative group. Patients in ctDNA positive group will receive individual therapeutic plan decided by the investigator. Patients in ctDNA negative group will receive regular examinations. When radiologic recurrences are confirmed, the patients will be re-evaluated for a second opportunity of radical resection.