Mental Health Conditions Clinical Trial
— AFYAOfficial title:
Clinic Waiting Room-based Pilot of Swahili Language Artificial Intelligence-driven Symptom Assessments in Primary Health Care Facilities, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Verified date | May 2022 |
Source | Ada Health GmbH |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
This study will evaluate the accuracy of the condition suggestions and urgency advice of the Swahili language Ada symptom assessment application (SAA), when symptoms are input by a lay-person user and a medical professional; these SAA results will then be compared to the condition suggestions and urgency advice of different tiers of doctors and a "gold standard" created by a panel.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 109 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | December 17, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 2 Months and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - All patients who enter the clinic and that are willing/able to provide consent will be included, except those who fall under certain conditions listed below Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with severe injury/illness requiring immediate treatment - Patients with traumatic injury (many of these patients require minimal anamnesis, and it is not rational to include them in a pilot study) - Patients incapable of completing a health assessment (e.g. due to illiteracy, mental impairment or inebriation or other incapacity). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Tanzania | Mbagala Rangi Tatu Hospital | Dar Es Salaam |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ada Health GmbH | Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences |
Tanzania,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Accuracy and Comprehensiveness measures of Ada WRA and HDA | The condition-suggestion accuracy and comprehensiveness of the SAA, evaluated against the gold-standard differential diagnosis determined by the review panel, reported in the context of the accuracy of the usual care health practitioner. | through study completion, an average of 4 months | |
Secondary | Comparison of usual care doctor condition suggestions | In Wing B only, while using the Ada HDA, the difference between the usual care doctor's condition suggestion accuracy and urgency advice will be compared between (1) the study arm where they determine a ranked list of condition suggestions before seeing Ada's list and then will choose a new ranked list based on viewing Ada's list, and (2) the study arm where after using the HDA, the doctor will see Ada's ranked list of condition suggestions and then choose to use Ada's full list or add some condition suggestions of their own. The accuracy of these will then also be compared to the study-provided physician and the gold standard panel. | through study completion, an average of 4 months | |
Secondary | Urgency advice accuracy | The urgency advice accuracy of the SAA, evaluated against the gold-standard triage levels determined by the review panel, reported in the context of the accuracy of the usual care health practitioner. | through study completion, an average of 4 months | |
Secondary | Questionnaire data insights | Qualitative data on the usability, usefulness and acceptance of the SAA | through study completion, an average of 4 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04556565 -
MIND/COVID-19: Mental Health Impact and NeeDs Associated With COVID-19: a Comprehensive National Evaluation in Spain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05336955 -
Evaluation of Telehealth Services on Mental Health Outcomes for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02657954 -
ASPIRE Cognitive Enhancement Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04245423 -
The Whole Health Study: Collaborative Care for OUD and Mental Health Conditions
|
N/A |