A Safety and Efficacy Study of the Combination Estradiol and Progesterone to Treat Vasomotor Symptoms

Menopause Clinical Trial

— REPLENISH  

Official title:

A Phase 3 Study Safety and Efficacy Study of the Combination Estradiol and Progesterone to Treat Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women With an Intact Uterus

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01942668
• Other study ID #: TXC12-05
• Secondary ID: REPLENISH Trial
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• Start date: August 5, 2013
• Est. completion date: October 28, 2016

Study information

• Verified date: April 2019
• Source: TherapeuticsMD
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will be a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter trial of postmenopausal subjects with an intact uterus.

Description:

Postmenopausal subjects with an intact uterus who meet the study entry criteria will be randomized to one of five treatment arms (four active and one placebo) and followed for 12 months. During the Screening period all subjects will be provided with a diary to self-assess the frequency and severity of their vasomotor symptoms. Subjects experiencing a minimum daily frequency of ≥7 (or ≥50 per week) moderate to severe hot flushes will participate in a VMS Substudy during the first 12 weeks of treatment. The Substudy subjects will be stratified by treatment arm within the sites, and only Substudy subjects have the possibility of being randomized to placebo. Subjects who qualify for the study except for experiencing a minimum daily frequency of ≥7 (or ≥50 per week) moderate to severe hot flushes will be stratified within sites to one of the four active treatment arms and followed for 12 months, but will not participate in the VMS Substudy. (However, VMS information will be collected from all subjects during the first 12 weeks of treatment.) All Study Subjects: Postmenopausal women with an intact uterus who seek relief from hot flushes and meet all other inclusion/exclusion criteria are eligible for 12 months of study treatment.

VMS Substudy Subjects: A subset of All Study Subjects who have ≥7 per day or ≥50 per week moderate to severe hot flushes (as determined during Screening) are eligible for the 12-week VMS Substudy and for a total of 12 months of study treatment.

Clinical evaluations will be performed at the following time points:

• Screening Period (Week: - 8.5) (up to -60 Days)

• Visit 1 Randomization (Week 0) (Day 1)

• Visit 2 Interim (Week 4)

• Visit 3 Interim (Week 8)

• Visit 4 Interim (Week 12)

• Visit 5 Interim (Month 6)

• Visit 6 Interim (Month 9)

• Visit 7 End of Treatment (Month 12)

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 1845
• Est. completion date: October 28, 2016
• Est. primary completion date: October 28, 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 40 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Be a female between the ages of 40 and 65 years (at the time of randomization) who is willing to participate in the study, as documented by signing the informed consent form.

2. Be a postmenopausal woman with an intact uterus and a Screening serum estradiol level of =50 pg/mL. Postmenopausal is defined herein as:

1. = 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea, or

2. at least 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with a Screening serum FSH level of >40 mIU/ml, or

3. = 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy.

3. Be seeking treatment or relief for vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.

4. To participate in the VMS Substudy, a subject must also report =7 moderate to severe hot flushes per day, or =50 per week, at the baseline assessment during Screening (subjects whose hot flushes are less frequent may still participate as non-Substudy subjects.

Note: A minimum of 14 consecutive days of complete hot flush diary data are required during the baseline assessment at Screening, and these consecutive days must occur within the last 14 days prior to the Randomization visit (not counting the Randomization visit day itself). The most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization (Day -7 to Day -1) will be used to determine the baseline number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for each subject.

5. Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal to 34 kg/mP2P. (BMI values should be rounded to the nearest integer [e.g., 34.4 rounds down to 34, while 26.5 rounds up to 27]).

6. Be willing to abstain from using products (other than study medication) that contain estrogen, progestin, or progesterone throughout study participation.

7. Be judged by the principal or sub-investigator physician as being in otherwise generally good health based on a medical evaluation performed during the Screening period prior to the initial dose of study medication. The medical evaluation findings must include:

1. a normal or non-clinically significant physical examination, including vital signs (sitting blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and temperature). Sitting systolic blood pressure is =140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure =90 mmHg at Screening. A subject may be taking up to two antihypertensive medications.

2. a normal or non-clinically significant pelvic examination.

3. a mammogram that shows no sign of significant disease (can be performed within previous 6 months prior to initial dose of study medication). Subjects must have a BI-RADS 1 or 2 to enroll in the study. An incomplete mammogram result, i.e. BI-RADS 0, is not acceptable. The site must obtain a copy of the official report for the subject's study file, and it must be verified that the mammogram itself is available if needed for additional assessment.

4. a normal or non-clinically significant clinical breast examination. An acceptable breast examination is defined as no masses or other findings identified that are suspicious of malignancy.

5. a normal Screening Papanicolaou ("Pap") smear. (Subjects with findings of atypical glandular cells [AGC], AGUS, ASCUS with high risk HPV type upon reflex testing, LSIL, ASC-H, HSIL, dysplastic cells, or malignant cells must be excluded from randomization.)

6. an acceptable result from an evaluable Screening endometrial biopsy. The endometrial biopsy reports by the two central pathologists at Screening must each specify one of the following: proliferative endometrium; weakly proliferative endometrium; disordered proliferative pattern; secretory endometrium; endometrial tissue other (including benign, inactive or atrophic fragments of endometrial epithelium, glands, stroma, etc); endometrial tissue insufficient for diagnosis; no endometrium identified; or no tissue identified. However, at least one pathologist must identify sufficient tissue to evaluate the biopsy. Additionally, the endometrial biopsy reports by the two central pathologists of Other Findings at Screening must each specify one of the following: endometrial polyp not present; benign endometrial polyp; or polyp other. (See Exclusion criterion #27)

7. a normal or non-clinically significant 12-lead ECG.

Exclusion Criteria:

• To participate in the study, a subject must NOT:

1. Be currently hospitalized.

2. Have a history of thrombosis of deep veins or arteries or a thromboembolic disorder.

3. Have a history of coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, TIA).

4. Have a history of a chronic liver or kidney dysfunction/disorder (e.g., Hepatitis C or chronic renal failure).

5. Have a history of a malabsorption disorder (e.g., gastric bypass, Crohn's disease).

6. Have a history of gallbladder dysfunction/disorders (e.g., cholangitis, cholecystitis), unless gallbladder has been removed.

7. Have a history of diabetes, thyroid disease or any other endocrinological disease. (Subjects with diet-controlled diabetes or controlled hypothyroid disease at Screening are not excluded.)

8. Have a history of estrogen-dependent neoplasia.

9. Have a history of atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast.

10. Have a finding of clinically significant uterine fibroids at Screening.

11. Have had a uterine ablation.

12. Have a history of undiagnosed vaginal bleeding.

13. Have any history of endometrial hyperplasia, melanoma, or uterine/endometrial, breast or ovarian cancer.

14. Have any history of other malignancy within the last 5 years, with the exception of basal cell (excluded if within 1 year) or non-invasive squamous cell (excluded if within 1 year) carcinoma of the skin.

15. Have a history of any other cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, pulmonary, hematologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, neurologic, psychological (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder), or musculoskeletal disease or disorder that is clinically significant in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or Medical Sub-Investigator.

16. Have any of the following clinical laboratory values at Screening:

1. fasting triglyceride of =300 mg/dL and/or total cholesterol of =300mg/dL

2. positive laboratory finding for Factor V Leiden mutation

3. AST or ALT =1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)

4. fasting glucose >125 mg/dL

17. Be known to be pregnant or have a positive urine pregnancy test. (Note: A pregnancy test is not required for subjects who have had bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or are 55 years old or greater and have experienced cessation of menses for at least 1 year.)

18. Have contraindication to estrogen and/or progestin therapy or allergy to the use of estradiol and/or progesterone or any components of the investigational drugs.

19. Use 15 or more cigarettes per day or currently use any electronic cigarettes.

20. Have a history of drug and/or alcohol abuse within one year of start of study.

21. Have used, within 28 days prior to the initial dose of study medication at Visit 1, any medication known to induce or inhibit CYP3A4 enzyme activity that may affect estrogen and/or progestin drug metabolism. (See 48TUSection 4.3U48T)

22. Have used, within 28 days prior to Screening, or plan to use during the study, any prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medications (including herbal products, such as St. John's Wort) that would be expected to alter progesterone or estrogen activity or is being used to treat vasomotor symptoms. (See Section 4.3U48T)

23. Have used estrogen alone or estrogen/progestin, SERM (selective estrogen receptor modulator), testosterone, or estrogen/testosterone for any of the following time periods:

1. Vaginal nonsystemic hormonal products (rings, creams, gels) within 7 days prior to Screening, or vaginal systemic products (e.g., FemRing) within 28 days prior to Screening.

2. Transdermal estrogen alone or estrogen/progestin products within 8 weeks prior to Screening.

3. Oral estrogen and/or progestin and/or SERM therapy within 8 weeks prior to Screening.

4. Progestational implants, estrogen or estrogen/progestational injectable drug therapy within 3 months prior to Screening.

5. Estrogen pellet therapy or progestational injectable drug therapy within 6 months prior to Screening.

6. Percutaneous estrogen lotions/gels within 8 weeks prior to Screening.

7. Oral, topical, vaginal, patch, implantable or injectable androgen therapy within 8 weeks prior to Screening.

24. Have used an intrauterine device (IUD) within the 12 weeks prior to Screening.

25. For subjects in the VMS Substudy only: use of medication that may affect the outcome of the vasomotor symptom endpoints within 28 days prior to Screening (e.g. SSRIs [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors], SNRIs [serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors], aldomet, dopaminergic or antidopaminergic drugs, gabapentin, clonidine, or bellergal.)

26. Have any reason which, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or Medical Sub-Investigator, would prevent the subject from safely participating in the study or complying with protocol requirements.

27. Have a Screening endometrial biopsy sample that is found by both primary pathologists to have endometrial tissue insufficient for diagnosis, no endometrium identified, or no tissue identified. (With the approval of the Medical Monitor, the Screening endometrial biopsy may be repeated once.)

28. Endometrial polyps with atypical nuclei reported by at least 1 central pathologist.

29. Have contraindication to any planned study assessments (e.g., endometrial biopsy).

30. Have participated in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to Screening, have received an investigational drug within the three months prior to the initial dose of study medication, or be likely to participate in a clinical trial or receive another investigational medication during the study.

31. Currently use marijuana.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Menopause

Intervention

Drug:
• Estradiol

• Progesterone

• Placebo

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Biofortis	Addison	Illinois
United States	Radiant Research (Akron)	Akron	Ohio
United States	Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.	Albuquerque	New Mexico
United States	Bosque Women's Care	Albuquerque	New Mexico
United States	Southwest Clinical Research	Albuquerque	New Mexico
United States	Radiant Research (Atlanta)	Atlanta	Georgia
United States	Women's Health Associates	Atlanta	Georgia
United States	South Florida Medical Research	Aventura	Florida
United States	Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation	Berkeley	California
United States	Billings Clinical Research	Billings	Montana
United States	Montana Health	Billings	Montana
United States	Quest Research Institute	Bingham Farms	Michigan
United States	Simon Williamson Clinic	Birmingham	Alabama
United States	Elite Clinical Trials	Blackfoot	Idaho
United States	Fellows Research Group	Bluffton	South Carolina
United States	DiscoveResearch, Inc.	Bryan	Texas
United States	Women's Health Practice	Champaign	Illinois
United States	UVA/Midlife Health at North Ridge	Charlottesville	Virginia
United States	Chattanooga Medical Research	Chattanooga	Tennessee
United States	Radiant Research (Chicago)	Chicago	Illinois
United States	University of Cincinnati Physicians Company	Cincinnati	Ohio
United States	Rapid Medical Research	Cleveland	Ohio
United States	Vista Clinical Research	Columbia	South Carolina
United States	Columbus Center for Women's Health Research	Columbus	Ohio
United States	Advanced Research Associates	Corpus Christi	Texas
United States	Nature Coast Clinical Research	Crystal River	Florida
United States	Research Across America	Dallas	Texas
United States	Soapstone Center for Clinical Research	Decatur	Georgia
United States	Downtown Women's Healthcare	Denver	Colorado
United States	Horizon's Clinical Research Center	Denver	Colorado
United States	PRO/ Salt Lake Women's Center	Draper	Utah
United States	Women's Wellness Clinic	Durham	North Carolina
United States	HWC Women's Research Center	Englewood	Ohio
United States	Horizon Research Group	Eunice	Louisiana
United States	Lillestol Research	Fargo	North Dakota
United States	Clinical Physiology Associates	Fort Myers	Florida
United States	Brownstone Clinical Trials	Fort Worth	Texas
United States	Southeastern Integrated Medical, PL, d/b/a Florida Medical Research	Gainesville	Florida
United States	Advanced Research Associates	Glendale	Arizona
United States	Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology	Grand Rapids	Michigan
United States	The South Bend Clinic Granger	Granger	Indiana
United States	Upstate Pharmaceutical Research	Greenville	South Carolina
United States	Carolina Medical Trials	High Point	North Carolina
United States	Health Star Research, LLC	Hot Springs	Arkansas
United States	Advances in Health	Houston	Texas
United States	The Women's Hospital of Texas	Houston	Texas
United States	TMC Life Research	Houston	Texas
United States	Medical Affiliated Research Center	Huntsville	Alabama
United States	Protenium Clinical Research	Hurst	Texas
United States	Davis Clinic	Indianapolis	Indiana
United States	MacArthur OB/GYN	Irving	Texas
United States	UF College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology	Jacksonville	Florida
United States	The Clinical Trial Center	Jenkintown	Pennsylvania
United States	Beyer Research	Kalamazoo	Michigan
United States	Volunteer Research Group/NOCCR	Knoxville	Tennessee
United States	Grossmont Center for Clinical Research	La Mesa	California
United States	Red Rocks OB/Gyn	Lakewood	Colorado
United States	Affiliated Clinical Research	Las Vegas	Nevada
United States	Affiliated Clinical Research INC	Las Vegas	Nevada
United States	Lawrence OB-GYN Clinical Research	Lawrenceville	New Jersey
United States	Central Kentucky Research Associates	Lexington	Kentucky
United States	Women's Clinic of Lincoln	Lincoln	Nebraska
United States	Bluegrass Clinical Research	Louisville	Kentucky
United States	Maryland Center for Sexual Health	Lutherville	Maryland
United States	Suncoast Research	Margate	Florida
United States	Sunstone Medical Research	Medford	Oregon
United States	Accelovance	Melbourne	Florida
United States	Advanced Clinical Research	Meridian	Idaho
United States	Cactus Clinical Research	Mesa	Arizona
United States	Clinical Research Consulting	Milford	Connecticut
United States	Coastal Clinical Research	Mobile	Alabama
United States	Mobile Ob-Gyn, P.C.	Mobile	Alabama
United States	Montgomery Women's Health	Montgomery	Alabama
United States	Coastal Carolina Research Center	Mount Pleasant	South Carolina
United States	Coastal Connecticut Research	New London	Connecticut
United States	Suncoast Clinical Research, Inc	New Port Richey	Florida
United States	Columbia University	New York	New York
United States	Clinical Research Center Eastern Virginia Medical School	Norfolk	Virginia
United States	Segal Institute	North Miami	Florida
United States	Ideal Clinical Research	North Miami Beach	Florida
United States	Futura Research	Norwalk	California
United States	Lynn Health Science Institute	Oklahoma City	Oklahoma
United States	Compass Research	Orlando	Florida
United States	Clinical Research of Philadelphia	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania
United States	Precision Trials	Phoenix	Arizona
United States	Radiant Research (St. Petersburg)	Pinellas Park	Florida
United States	Clinical Trials Research Services, LLC	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania
United States	All Women's Healthcare of West Broward Discovery Clinical Research	Plantation	Florida
United States	Suffolk OB/GYN	Port Jefferson	New York
United States	Centre OBGYN	Raleigh	North Carolina
United States	Wake County Research	Raleigh	North Carolina
United States	National Clinical Research-Richmond, Inc	Richmond	Virginia
United States	Virginia Women's Center	Richmond	Virginia
United States	Saginaw Valley Medical Research Group	Saginaw	Michigan
United States	Radiant Research (St. Louis)	Saint Louis	Missouri
United States	Lyndhurst Clinical Research	Salem	North Carolina
United States	Jean Brown Research	Salt Lake City	Utah
United States	Wasatch Clinical Research, LLC	Salt Lake City	Utah
United States	Clinical Trials of Texas	San Antonio	Texas
United States	Stone Oak, LLC dba Discovery Clinical Trials	San Antonio	Texas
United States	Medical Center for Clinical Research	San Diego	California
United States	Women's Health Care Research Corp.	San Diego	California
United States	Wake Research - Mount Vernon Clinical Research	Sandy Springs	Georgia
United States	Radiant Research, Inc.	Santa Rosa	California
United States	Fellows Research Alliance	Savannah	Georgia
United States	NECRSA	Schertz	Texas
United States	Seattle Women's Health Research, Gynecology	Seattle	Washington
United States	North Spokane Women's Health	Spokane	Washington
United States	Radiant Research (Tucson)	Tucson	Arizona
United States	Visions Clinical Research Tucson	Tucson	Arizona
United States	Tidewater Clinical Research	Virginia Beach	Virginia
United States	Diablo Clinical Research	Walnut Creek	California
United States	Omega Medical Research	Warwick	Rhode Island
United States	Comprehensive Clinical Trials	West Palm Beach	Florida
United States	Cypress Medical Research Center, LLC	Wichita	Kansas
United States	Upstate Clinical Research Associates	Williamsville	New York
United States	Carolina Medical Trials	Winston-Salem	North Carolina
United States	Hawthorne Research	Winston-Salem	North Carolina
United States	Triad Ob-Gyn	Winston-Salem	North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
TherapeuticsMD

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (6)

Gerlinger C, Gude K, Hiemeyer F, Schmelter T, Schäfers M. An empirically validated responder definition for the reduction of moderate to severe hot flushes in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2012 Jul;19(7):799-803. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31823de8ba. — View Citation

Hays RD and Stewart AL. Sleep measures. In AL Stewart & JE Ware (eds), Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach (pp 235-259). Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.

Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, van Maris B, Ross A, Franssen E, Guyatt GH, Norton PG, Dunn E. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 1996 Jul;24(3):161-75. Erratum in: Maturitas 1996 Nov;25(3):231. — View Citation

Kurman RJ, Ellenson L H, and Ronnett B.M., ed. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2011:305-452.

Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3. Review. — View Citation

Spritzer, K. L. & Hays, R. D. (2003, November). MOS Sleep Scale: A Manual for Use and Scoring, Version 1.0. Los Angeles, CA.

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 4
Primary	Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 12
Primary	Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 4
Primary	Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 12
Primary	Primary Safety Endpoint: Endometrial Protection - Hyperplasia	Endometrial biopsies centrally evaluated by 2 primary pathologists using criteria from Blaustein's Pathology text. Pathologists classified bx into 1 of following 3 categories: Cat.1: Non-endometrial malignancy/non-hyperplasia; Cat.2: Endometrial hyperplasia; Cat.3: Endometrial malignancy. Consensus reached when 2 primary pathologist agreed on any of above categories; if primary pathologists disagreed on presence of hyperplasia, result of 3rd pathologist was utilized and final decision regarding presence of hyperplasia was based on diagnosis of majority. If all 3 reads disparate, final diagnosis based on most severe dx. Incidence rate calculated as: I=A/B where I=incidence rate at M12 evaluation, A=all new subjects with biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia during study but post-Baseline, B=all subjects w/biopsies following M11 meeting criteria specified plus all subjects w/biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia by any pathologists before M11.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Endometrial Protection - Hyperplasia	Endometrial biopsies centrally evaluated by 3 primary pathologists using criteria described in Blaustein's Pathology text. Pathologists classified biopsy into 1 of following 3 categories: Cat.1: Non-endometrial malignancy/non-hyperplasia; Cat.2: Endometrial hyperplasia; Cat.3: Endometrial malignancy. Consensus was reached when the 2 of 3 pathologist readers agreed on any of the above categories; if all three reads were disparate, the final diagnosis was based on the most severe diagnosis. Incidence rate calculated as: I=A/B where I=incidence rate at M12 evaluation, A=all new subjects with biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia during study but post-Baseline, B=all subjects with biopsies following M11 meeting the criteria specified plus all subjects with biopsies positive for endometrial hyperplasia by any of the pathologists before M11.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 1
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 2
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 3
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 5
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 6
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 7
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 9
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 10
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 11
Secondary	Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of moderate to severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 1
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 2
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 3
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 5
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 6
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 7
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 9
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 10
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 11
Secondary	Severity of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score = (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of moderate to severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 1
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 2
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 3
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 5
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 6
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 7
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 9
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 10
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 11
Secondary	Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The weekly frequency of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes was calculated from the daily diary record using a forward counting process of 7 day intervals beginning with the baseline date. Weekly frequency equals total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes for the subject week.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 1. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 1
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 2. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 2
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 3. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 3
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 4. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 5. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 5
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 6. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 6
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 7. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 7
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 8. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 9. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 9
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 10. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 10
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 11. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 11
Secondary	Severity of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in severity of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms at Baseline to mild, moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms at Week 12. The baseline was the most recent 7 consecutive days of data prior to randomization. The severity score was derived as follows: mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3. Baseline Weekly Severity Score =(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days). On Treatment Weekly Severity Score = [(number of mild hot flushes for 7 days) x 1 + (number of moderate hot flushes for 7 days) x 2 + (number of severe hot flushes for 7 days) x 3] / (total number of mild, moderate and severe hot flushes over 7 days).	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from Baseline to Week 1.	Baseline and Week 1
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2.	Baseline and Week 2
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3.	Baseline and Week 3
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4.	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5.	Baseline and Week 5
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6.	Baseline and Week 6
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7.	Baseline and Week 7
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8.	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9.	Baseline and Week 9
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10.	Baseline and Week 10
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11.	Baseline and Week 11
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 1 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 1.	Baseline and Week 1
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 2 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 2.	Baseline and Week 2
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 3 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 3.	Baseline and Week 3
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 4 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4.	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 5 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 5.	Baseline and Week 5
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 6.	Baseline and Week 6
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 7 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 7.	Baseline and Week 7
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 8 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8.	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 9 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 9.	Baseline and Week 9
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 10 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 10.	Baseline and Week 10
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 11 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 11.	Baseline and Week 11
Secondary	Reduction of Frequency of Mild, Moderate and Severe Vasomotor Symptoms - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Number of Subjects with >=50%, and separately, >=75% reduction in frequency of mild, moderate and severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)	The number and percentage of subjects for each possible response to the CGI at Week 4. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo.	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 4 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 4 for the respective CGI category. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo.	Baseline and Week 4
Secondary	Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)	The number and percentage of subjects for each possible response to the CGI at Week 8. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo.	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 8 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 8 for the respective CGI category. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo.	Baseline and Week 8
Secondary	Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	The number and percentage of subjects for each possible response to the CGI at Week 12. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS for the Respective CGI Category - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from Baseline to Week 12 for the respective CGI category. The CGI score is a seven point scale where subjects were asked to rate the total improvement, whether or not in her judgment it was due entirely to drug treatment, compared to her condition at admission to the study. Scale: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. Results for the top two responses (Very Much Improved and Much Improved) and No Change or Worsening (Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse) were combined for each group and active treatment groups compare to placebo.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 1 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 2 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 3 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 4 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 5 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 6 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 7 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 8 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 9 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 10 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 11 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	Cycle 12 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects Without Bleeding for Consecutive Cycles	No bleeding was defined as the absence of bleeding. Cumulative rates for no bleeding was defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of no bleeding for a given cycle of time.	The 13th Cycle
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 1 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 1 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 1 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 2 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 2 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 2 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 3 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 3 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 3 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 4 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 4 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 4 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 5 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 5 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 5 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 6 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 6 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 6 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 7 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 7 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 7 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 8 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 8 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 8 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 9 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 9 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 9 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 10 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 10 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 10 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 11 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 11 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 11 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From Cycle 12 to 13	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from Cycle 12 to 13 was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	Cycle 12 to 13
Secondary	Number of Subjects With Cumulative Amenorrhea From the 13th Cycle	Cumulative amenorrhea is defined as the absence of bleeding or spotting for a cumulative period. Cumulative rates of amenorrhea were defined as the percentage of women who reported consecutive cycles of amenorrhea for a given cycle of time. Within each treatment arm, the percentage of subjects with cumulative amenorrhea from the 13th Cycle was calculated and compared between active and placebo treatments.	The 13th Cycle
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 1
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 2
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 3
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Spotting - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 4
Secondary	Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 1
Secondary	Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 2
Secondary	Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 3
Secondary	Number of Days With Spotting - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with spotting per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 4
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 1
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 2
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 3
Secondary	Subject Incidence With Bleeding - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of subject incidence with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 4
Secondary	Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 1 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 1
Secondary	Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 2 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 2
Secondary	Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 3 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 3
Secondary	Number of Days With Bleeding - Trimester 4 (Safety Pop.)	Summary of the number of days with bleeding per trimester as recorded in a daily diary. A trimester is defined as every 90 days since Day 1.	Trimester 4
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Overall Scores from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)	Changes in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 6 (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 12 (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Week 12 (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Week 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline (BL) to Week 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 6 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 6 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 12 - (MITT-VMS)	Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)	Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)	Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Vasomotor Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)	Changes in Vasomotor Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Vasomotor domain score is mean of = Q1,Q2, Q3, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)	Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)	Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Psychosocial Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)	Changes in Psychosocial Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Psychosocial domain score is mean of = Q4 to Q10, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)	Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)	Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Physical Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)	Changes in Physical Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Physical domain score is mean of = Q11 to Q26, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Week 12 (MITT)	Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 6 (MITT)	Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Sexual Domain Score - Month 12 (MITT)	Changes in Sexual Domain Score from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. Each domain is scored separately. Sexual domain score is mean of = Q27 to Q29, with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Week 12 (MITT)	Change in Overall Scores from Baseline to Week 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 6 (MITT)	Change in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 6. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) - Overall Scores - Month 12 (MITT)	Change in Overall Scores from Baseline to Month 12. The MENQOL is self-administered questionnaire which assessed changes in quality of life over a one-month period. It is composed of 29 questions indicating if subject experienced the problem (Yes/No) and if Yes, rating scale ranged from 0=Not bothered at all to 6=Extremely bothered. The scale contains four domains: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual. For analysis, the original scores were converted to the analysis score ranging from 1-8 where No=1, 0=2, 1=3...and 6=8. The Overall Score is the mean of the 4 domain scores with 1 being "not at all bothered" and 8 being "extremely bothered".	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Week 12 (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 6 (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Total Sleep Score - Month 12 (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Total Sleep Score as compared w/Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Total score includes items Q1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q1, 4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Total score= average of item scores; ranges =0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome. If any of individual questions used to obtain total score is missing, total score will be set to missing value.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Disturbance - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Disturbance individual score as compared with Placebo. MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over past 4 wks. Q1 scored on scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 self-reported hrs of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep disturbance includes items Q1, Q3, Q7, Q8. Scoring method: Answer to Q1 is rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25. Answers to Q3, 7, 8 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range(0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is average of item scores; score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Snoring - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Snoring individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Snoring item is Q10. Scoring method: Answer to Q10 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Short of Breath or Headache - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Short of Breath or Headache(SOBHA) individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. SOBHA item is Q5. Scoring method: Answer to Q5 is reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Adequacy - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Adequacy individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Adequacy includes items Q4, Q12. Scoring method: Answers for Q4 and Q12 are reversed and rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new = (6-MOS_4_old) x 20; MOS_12_new = (6-MOS_12_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range = 0 to 100, where higher score means better outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Somnolence - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Somnolence individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-Q12 are scored 1-6 ranging from 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Somnolence items include Q6, Q9, Q11. Scoring method: Answers to Q6, Q 9 and Q11 are reversed & rescaled to 0 to 100 such that 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible". MOS_n_new <- (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index I - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index I individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self-reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index I includes items Q4, Q5, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q, 5, 7, 8, 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range (0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20. Answers to Q4, & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Wk 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Sleep Problems Index II - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 6 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Individual Score for Sleep Problems Index II - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline to Month 12 in MOS Sleep Problems Index II individual score as compared with Placebo. The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items that measure 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 weeks. Q1 is scored on a scale 1-5: 1=0-15 min, 2=16-30 min...5=>60 mins. Q2 is self reported hours of sleep per night. Q3-12 scored 1-6 where 1=All of the time to 6=None of the time. Sleep Problems Index II items include Q1, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q12. Scoring method: Answers to Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9 are reversed & rescaled to realign to be same direction and range 0 to 100 with 0="best possible" & 100="worst possible" as follows: MOS_n_new = (6-MOS_n_old) x 20, for n=Q3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Answers to Q1, 4 & 12 are rescaled to 0-100 as follows: MOS_1_new =(MOS_1_old - 1) x 25; MOS_4_new =(MOS_4_old - 1) x 20; MOS_12_new=(MOS_12_old - 1) x 20. Score is the average of item scores; score range range=0 to 100, where higher score means worse outcome.	Baseline and Month 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Week 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline (BL) to Wk 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo.The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm.	Baseline and Week 12
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 6 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 6 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo.The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm.	Baseline and Month 6
Secondary	Medical Outcomes Sleep Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep - Month 12 - (MITT)	Change from Baseline (BL) to Month 12 in MOS Optimal Sleep Score as compared with Placebo.The MOS-Sleep Self Report Questionnaire is composed of 12 items measuring 6 dimensions of sleep over the past 4 wks. Optimal sleep is based on Q2 (self-reported average hrs sleep per night in past 4 wks). Scoring method: hrs of sleep coded 0 (non-optimal) or 1 (optimal) where 1-6 hrs & 9-23 hrs = 0, 7-8 hrs = 1. Change from BL: subject sleeps 7-8 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = -1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 7-8 hrs at follow-up, change = +1; subject sleeps 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at BL & 1-6 or 9-23 hrs at follow-up, change = 0. Mean change from BL: changes are summed to give the Net Total (equivalent to the number subjects w/ improved sleep hrs minus the number subjects w/ worsened sleep hrs), which is divided by the number of subjects to give the mean proportion of net change, where >0 = overall improvement and <0 = overall worsening in the study arm.	Baseline and Month 12