Comparative Study of Individualized Sensitivity-Directed Chemotherapy Versus DTIC

Melanoma Clinical Trial

— ChemoSensMM  

Official title:

Prospectively Randomized Phase III Study of an Individualized Sensitivity-Directed Combination Chemotherapy Versus DTIC as First-Line Treatment in Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00779714
• Other study ID #: 101.321-13/07
• Secondary ID: EudraCT Nr. 2008
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: October 22, 2008
• Last updated: October 22, 2008
• Start date: October 2008
• Est. completion date: April 2013

Study information

• Verified date: October 2008
• Source: University of Wuerzburg
• Contact: Selma Ugurel, Prof. (MD)
• Phone: 0049931201
• Email: Ugurel_S[@]klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This phase III trial is aimed to investigate the efficacy of an individualized, sensitivity-directed combination chemotherapy in comparison to the standard regimen DTIC.

Two question are aimed to be answered by this study:

1. Is the individual chemosensitivity index (BICSI) a prognostic / predictive biomarker for chemotherapy ?

2. Is an individualized, sensitivity-directed combination chemotherapy superior to the standard regimen DTIC in terms of survival and response ?

Description:

Melanoma is a cutaneous neoplasm known for its high aggressiveness, its early dissemination of metastases, and its poor prognosis once metastasized. Chemotherapy with dacarbacine (DTIC) is widely accepted as the standard treatment in metastatic melanoma, with reported response rates of about 10%. This poor outcome is assumed to be due to a high chemoresistance intrinsic to melanoma cells. However, other therapeutic options like polychemotherapy, biochemotherapy, immunotherapy as well as targeted agents did not yet prove to be superior to DTIC in multicenter randomized studies.

Therefore, chemotherapy still is considered as the main therapeutic option in advanced metastatic melanoma, and a number of non-standard chemotherapeutics have been tested in small pilot studies to improve treatment efficacy. Even though complete remissions of metastatic lesions could only be observed in a few patients, these observations indicate a subgroup of patients exhibiting high sensitivity to certain anticancer drugs. An in vitro ATP-based chemosensitivity assay has been shown to differentiate between chemosensitive and chemoresistant melanoma patients. A phase-II-study testing this assay in 53 metastatic melanoma patients followed by a sensitivity-directed individualized chemotherapy demonstrated, that the chemosensitivity profile of an individual patient, reflected by the best individual chemosensitivity index (BICSI), correlated with therapy outcome in terms of therapy response and patient overall survival (Ugurel S: Clin Cancer Res 2006). Interestingly, a surprisingly high proportion of about 2/5 of the investigated patient cohort were classified as chemosensitive, the remaining 3/5 were classified as chemoresistant. Objective response was 36.4% in chemosensitive patients compared to 16.1% in chemoresistant patients (p=0.114); progression arrest (CR+PR+SD) was 59.1% versus 22.6% (p=0.01). Chemosensitive patients showed an increased overall survival of 14.6 months compared to 7.4 months in chemoresistant patients (p=0.041).

These encouraging results prompted the initiation of this randomized phase-III-trial investigating an individualized sensitivity-directed combination chemotherapy compared to the current standard treatment DTIC, as first-line treatment in metastatic melanoma. The therapeutics for chemosensitivity testing and treatment of patients were chosen considering the results of the phase-II-trial (paclitaxel+cisplatinum, treosulfan+cytarabine).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 360
• Est. completion date: April 2013
• Est. primary completion date: October 2012
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histologically confirmed melanoma of the skin, mucosa, or unknown primary, diagnosed with surgically unresectable distant metastases (stage IV according to AJCC).

• At least one measurable target lesion according to RECIST, assessed by CT or MRI (tumor assessment by X-ray or ultrasonography only is not allowed).

• Access to a biopsy of ~1 cm3 from at least one metastatic lesion for in vitro chemosensitivity testing. Cell suspensions from malignant effusions are also eligible.

• No prior chemotherapy in stage IV (adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III allowed; one prior regimen of immunotherapy or targeted therapy in stage IV allowed).

• No evidence of brain/CNS metastases. Former history of brain/CNS metastases, which have been treated successfully, and are no longer visible in CT/MRI is allowed.

• Last complete tumor assessment (CT or MRI of thorax, abdomen and brain) not older than 14 days prior to registration, and not older than 5 weeks prior to onset of study treatment.

• ECOG/WHO performance index of 0 or 1.

• Patients must have stopped any kind of previous antineoplastic therapy for at least 2 weeks prior to registration, and at least 4 weeks prior to treatment onset.

• Patients must not have concurrent or recent malignancies except for surgically cured carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with previous malignancies, which have been treated with a subsequent disease-free interval of at least 5 years, are eligible.

• Patient age = 18 years.

• Adequate hematological, renal and liver function as defined by the following laboratory values performed within 14 days prior to randomisation:

• absolute neutrophil count (ANC) = 1.5 x 109/l

• platelet count = 100 x 109/l

• hemoglobin = 9 g/dl

• urea and serum creatinine = 2 times upper normal limit (UNL)

• total and direct serum bilirubin = 2 times UNL

• GOT or GPT = 2.5 times UNL; = 5 times UNL is allowed in case of liver metastasis

• alkaline phosphatase < 2.5 times UNL

• Female patients should not be pregnant or nursing. Women of childbearing potential should be using a highly effective method of birth control (e.g. implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs, sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner). For subjects using a hormonal contraceptive method, information regarding the product under evaluation and its potential effect on the contraceptive should be addressed.

• Male patients should use an effective method of contraception.

• Before registration, written informed consent must be given according to GCP guidelines and national/local regulations. Patients must be willing and giving informed consent to participation in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

• All metastatic lesions are surgically resectable.

• Prior chemotherapy in stage IV (adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III allowed; one prior regimen of immunotherapy or targeted therapy in stage IV allowed).

• Primary melanoma of the uvea / choroidea.

• Evidence of brain/CNS metastases. Former history of brain/CNS metastases, which have been treated successfully, and are no longer visible in CT/MRI is allowed.

• ECOG/WHO performance index of 2 or higher

• Concurrent or recent malignancies except for surgically cured carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with previous malignancies, which have been treated with a subsequent disease-free interval of at least 5 years, are eligible.

• Any severe or uncontrolled hematological, renal or liver dysfunction as defined by the laboratory values given in Inclusion Criteria.

• Any clinically uncontrolled infectious disease including HIV positivity or AIDS-related illness.

• Any female patients who are pregnant or nursing.

• Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration for the trial.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Melanoma

Intervention

Drug:
• DTIC (dacarbazine)
1000 mg/m2, d1 every 21 days
• paclitaxel + cisplatin
paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 cisplatin 50 mg/m2 d1 every 21 days
• treosulfan + cytarabine
treosulfan 2500 mg/m2, d2 cytarabine 100 mg/m2, d1-3 every 21 days

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Aachen	Aachen
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Berlin Charite	Berlin
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Bochum	Bochum
Germany	Medizinisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz	Bonn
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Essen	Essen
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Frankfurt	Frankfurt / Main
Germany	Dermatology, Klinikum Frankfurt/Oder	Frankfurt/Oder
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Hannover	Hannover
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, Saarland University	Homburg/Saar
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Jena	Jena
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel	Kiel
Germany	Dermatology, Klinikum Ludwishafen	Ludwigshafen
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck	Luebeck
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, Univeristy of Magdeburg	Magdeburg
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Mainz	Mainz
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Mannheim	Mannheim
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Marburg	Marburg
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Muenchen	Muenchen
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Muenster	Muenster
Germany	Dept of Medical Oncology, Fachklinik Hornheide	Muenster
Germany	Dermatology, Klinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben	Quedlinburg
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen	Tuebingen
Germany	Dept of Dermatology, University of Wuerzburg	Wuerzburg

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Wuerzburg	DCS Innovative Diagnostik Systeme, Hiege-Stiftung gegen Hautkrebs, medac GmbH

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (4)

Andreotti PE, Cree IA, Kurbacher CM, Hartmann DM, Linder D, Harel G, Gleiberman I, Caruso PA, Ricks SH, Untch M, et al. Chemosensitivity testing of human tumors using a microplate adenosine triphosphate luminescence assay: clinical correlation for cisplatin resistance of ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1995 Nov 15;55(22):5276-82. — View Citation

Cree IA, Neale MH, Myatt NE, de Takats PG, Hall P, Grant J, Kurbacher CM, Reinhold U, Neuber K, MacKie RM, Chana J, Weaver PC, Khoury GG, Sartori C, Andreotti PE. Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Anticancer Drugs. 1999 Jun;10(5):437-44. — View Citation

Ugurel S, Schadendorf D, Pföhler C, Neuber K, Thoelke A, Ulrich J, Hauschild A, Spieth K, Kaatz M, Rittgen W, Delorme S, Tilgen W, Reinhold U; Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group. In vitro drug sensitivity predicts response and survival after individualized sensitivity-directed chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a multicenter phase II trial of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 15;12(18):5454-63. — View Citation

Ugurel S, Tilgen W, Reinhold U. Chemosensitivity testing in malignant melanoma. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003;161:81-92. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Disease-specific overall survival		4 years	No
Secondary	Objective response		4 years	No

External Links

•   Homepage of organization (ADO, DeCOG) conducting this trial