Mechanical Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effect of Focal Muscle Vibration on Flexibility and Perceived Stiffness in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain
Verified date | May 2022 |
Source | Riphah International University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Low back pain that does not have any known specific pathology i.e.: tumor, any infection, fracture, osteoporosis, structural deformity, radicular syndrome, inflammatory disorder or cauda equine syndrome) is referred as non-specific low back pain.Over worldwide low back pain is a major public health challenge. Low back pain prevalence is shown to be 84% while 23% of chronic low back pain. Disability due to low back pain is about 11 to 12%. Low back pain is a leading cause of increasing economic burden in respect to huge medical expenses. Statistical analysis of indirect and direct expenses for the low back pain treatment in U.S shows over $100 billion per year.Many risk factors for low back pain has been identified including degeneration of lumbar discs, over weight/obesity, sedentary life style and mechanical factors i.e. occupational sitting, manual handling and assisting patients, awkward postures, lifting and carrying weights. Exercise therapy is suggested as an effective treatment in improving function of the back muscles and relieving pain in patients with Low back pain. Many studies suggested that muscle vibration is effective as the vibration signals are delivered via an external stimulator that is exposed to the part of the body resulting in pain relief and reducing muscle spasm. Vibratory stimuli have practical uses in rehabilitation and in exercise performance. Increasing reflexive activity through the stimulation of muscle spindles results in tonic vibratory reflex. The mechanical and electrical responses of the muscle could vary with the frequency of the vibration to the muscle. LMV effects are localized to the point where the stimulation is given and this is the result of neurogenic potentiation through the tonic vibratory reflex from the stimulation of muscle spindles. In our study we will work with 120hz frequency to improve the flexibility and perceived stiffness.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 44 |
Est. completion date | December 30, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | November 30, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 25 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: • Having mechanical low back pain from past 3 months Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with neurological symptoms - Back operations 6 months before - Leg length discrepancies - Those diagnosed with bony deformity of spine like scoliosis and spondylolisthesis. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Pakistan | Pakistan Railway General Hospital | Rawalpindi | Punjab |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Riphah International University |
Pakistan,
Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F, Cedraschi C. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):482-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60610-7. Epub 2011 Oct 6. Review. — View Citation
Brumagne S, Lysens R, Swinnen S, Verschueren S. Effect of paraspinal muscle vibration on position sense of the lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 1;24(13):1328-31. — View Citation
Mischi M, Cardinale M. The effects of a 28-Hz vibration on arm muscle activity during isometric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar;41(3):645-53. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818a8a69. — View Citation
Pamukoff DN, Ryan ED, Blackburn JT. The acute effects of local muscle vibration frequency on peak torque, rate of torque development, and EMG activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Dec;24(6):888-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Aug 7. — View Citation
Wang XQ, Pi YL, Chen PJ, Chen BL, Liang LC, Li X, Wang X, Zhang J. Whole body vibration exercise for chronic low back pain: study protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Apr 2;15:104. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-104. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Sit and Reach Test | The sit and reach test is the most common of all flexibility tests. It measures the flexibility of the clients' lower back and hamstrings. All you need is a box about 30cm high and a meter ruler.
Your client should sit on the floor with their back and head against a wall. Their legs should be out straight ahead and their knees flat against the floor. Place the box against your client's feet (no shoes). Whilst keeping their head and back against the wall, instruct your client to stretch out their arms as far as they can towards the box without their head or back loosing contact with the wall. Place the ruler on the box and move the zero end towards your clients fingertips. When the ruler touches their fingertips you have the zero point and the test can begin. Instruct your client to lean forward slowly as far as possible keeping their fingertips level with each other and their legs flat on the floor. Their head and shoulders can come away from the wall now. Slowly |
Change from baseline to 4 weeks | |
Primary | Likert stiffness scale: | this is 7 points scale, o indicate a complete absence of soreness and 6 indicates a severe muscle soreness,stiffness and weakness that limits my ability to move | Change from baseline to 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Numeric Pain Rating Scale: | General Information:
The patient is asked to make three pain ratings, corresponding to current, best and worst pain experienced over the past 24 hours. The average of the 3 ratings was used to represent the patient's level of pain over the previous 24 hours. • Patient Instructions (adopted from (McCaffery, Beebe et al. 1989): "Please indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst pain levels over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)" |
Change from baseline to 4 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06009263 -
Effect of Open Chain Versus Closed Chain Segmental Control Exercises on CSA of Lumbar Multifidus Muscle in Chronic MLBP
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05052840 -
Effects of Back Muscles Endurance Training in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04562701 -
Relationship Between Hamstring Length and Gluteus Maximums in Mechanical Low Back Pain
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04542798 -
CRF vs WCRF or PRF-DRG in CLBP of FJ Origin and RFA Failure of MBDR: Central Sensitization and Aberrant Nerve Sprouting
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02276794 -
Thrust Versus Non-thrust Manipulation in Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01940744 -
Prescriptive Mobilization Versus a Pragmatic Mobilization
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02226692 -
Prognostic Factors of Disabling Low Back Pain in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05616702 -
Effectiveness of Pressure Biofeedback Therapy and Progressive Muscle Relaxation Technique in Improving Pain and Disability Among Patients With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02622789 -
Efficacy and Influence of Pilates Based Physical Therapy Exercises for Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05088031 -
Shock Wave Therapy Versus Mechanical Traction on Mechanical Low Back Pain
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06330792 -
Effect of Bio-mechanical Awareness and Core Stability Exercises on Mechanical Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03949179 -
Optimizing Management of Low Back Pain Through the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model
|
||
Completed |
NCT01591824 -
Study of Effectiveness of Pold in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03517410 -
Association Between the Duration of Smart Phone Use and Back Dysfunction in Patients With Low Back Pain
|
||
Completed |
NCT02239289 -
Use of Biofeedback Training to Correct Abnormal Neuromechanical Pattern in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05404997 -
Comparative Effects of SWT and Maitland LM in Mechanical LBP
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05475912 -
Effect of Talocrural Joint Thrust Manipulation on Mechanical Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04726579 -
CBD Oil in Mechanical Back Pain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02491879 -
Ketoprofen Gel vs Placebo in Low Back Pain
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01557049 -
Global Postural Reeducation in Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A |