Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05411510 |
Other study ID # |
2022 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 20, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
December 20, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2022 |
Source |
Cairo University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Missing teeth usually result in functional and cosmetic deficits. Traditionally, they have
been restored with dentures or fixed bridges. However, dental implants represent an excellent
alternative which rely on the maintenance of a direct structural and functional connection
between living bone and implant surface, which is termed osseointergration . When sufficient
bone is available in maxilla, implant rehabilitation has shown high success rates of 84-92 %.
Atrophy of the alveolar crest and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus limits the quality
and quantity of residual bone, therefore complicating the placement of implants in the
posterior maxillary area.
Description:
Among the techniques used to overcome low vertical bone height in the maxilla is maxillary
sinus floor augmentation. It can be performed either through a lateral window, or via a
crestal access. Many long term studies and systematic reviews have showed that osteotome
mediated sinus floor elevation (OSFE) technique is a highly predictable method for
rehabilitation of patients with atrophied posterior maxilla with survival rates ranging from
92 % to 100 %. However, endoscopic studies have demonstrated the risk of membrane perforation
while performing transalveolar sinus floor elevation. Moreover, the Summers technique can
cause some complications as headache and paroxysmal positional vertigo. Additionally, the
activity of osteotomes during the application of malleting pressure is difficult to control,
resulting in unwanted instrument and/or graft penetration into the sinus cavity, potentially
causing membrane penetration.
However, Huwais invented a new technology termed osseodensification for enhancing implant
primary stability in 2015. This technology is performed with the use of specially developed
drill bits (Densah burs) that combine the benefits of osteotomes with tactile control during
the expansion. They have four or more lands with a negative rake angle, which prevents the
bur's edges from cutting the bone and so compacts it smoothly. These drills have a tapered
shank and a cutting chisel edge. They can thus go deeper into the osteotomy site, while the
drill's gradually increasing diameter aids in the site's gradual enlargement. Drills are
utilized to enter into the bone in a clockwise rotation (Cutting mode) until the appropriate
depth of the osteotomy is reached. Afterwards, counterclockwise rotations (Densifying mode)
generate a robust and dense layer of bone tissue along the osteotomy's walls and base.
Through controlled deformation, this procedure burnishes bone along the inner layer of the
osteotomy site. The goal is to construct a condensed layer of autografted bone along the
implant's periphery and apex. This would improve the bone-implant contact, hence increasing
insertion torque values and, as a result, implant primary stability.