Face Mask Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of the Effects of Alternating Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Facemask Use in Cases of Class III Malocclusion Caused by Maxillary Retrognathia- A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Diverse viewpoints exist regarding the correlation between the conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and facemask approach and the alternative RME and facemask hybrid technique (Alt-RAMEC) in terms of the degree of maxillary protraction. The findings of the study may offer a novel approach to protocol selection based on the anomaly's degree of severity. The objective of this investigation is to assess and contrast the skeletal and dentoalveolar outcomes of three distinct Alt-RAMEC techniques.
Alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) procedure is one of the most frequently used methods in the treatment of Class III cases caused by maxillary retrognathia. The objective of this investigation is to conduct a comparative analysis of the skeletal and dentofacial outcomes of three distinct techniques for maxillary protraction Following the primary recording, the patients were evaluated using bonded-type rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices and three discrete Alt-RAMEC techniques (1, 3, and 5 weeks). Lateral cephalograms were obtained from a sample of 40 patients (18 males and 22 females) with a mean age of 10.64 ± 0.98. These images were taken both before (T1) and after the 6th month of facemask treatment (T2), and were subjected to total and local superimpositions. The Wilcoxon Sign, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the data. ;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT02350803 -
Does Use of Rigid Fixation After Removing Distraction Osteogenesis Device Reduce the Relapse?
|
Phase 2 |