Stabilometric and Baropodometric Evaluation After Osteopathic Scaphoid Tug Manipulation

Manipulation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Stabilometric and Baropodometric Evaluation of Osteopathic Scaphoid Tug Manipulation

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05583760
• Other study ID #: CEEI22/322
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 18, 2022
• Est. completion date: February 7, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: February 2023
• Source: Cardenal Herrera University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a clinical, longitudinal, prospective and randomised study in which the subject will be assessed by stabilometric and baropodometric techniques on two occasions (before being subjected to the scaphoid tug manipulation for the experimental group or placebo technique in the case of the control group).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 36
• Est. completion date: February 7, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: October 18, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subjects with right scaphoid external rotation dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria:

• Suffering from disorders that alter balance (tension headaches, vertigo, migraines...).

• Deformities, orthopaedic injuries or sequelae in the limbs or spine that may alter postural statics (valgus-varus, lower limb operations, lower limb dysmetries, scoliosis, etc.).

• Pathologies or sequelae related to the postural sensors or disorders in the same:

• Uncorrected visual defects.

• Vestibular disorders.

• Uncorrected stomatological disorders.

• Sensory alterations in the foot sensor (Hypoaesthesia, Morton's neuroma, tarsal canal syndrome, etc.).

• Cutaneous alterations that influence the foot pick-up (papillomas, plantar warts, ingrown toenails, etc.).

• Ingestion of medication that alters the perception of stability.

• Having any contraindication to the scaphoid tug technique.

• Having carried out intense physical activity immediately prior to the study.

• Having received osteopathic treatment in the last month.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Manipulation

Intervention

Procedure:
• Experimental: Osteopathic manipulation TUG for scaphoid bone
The sequence of execution of the scaphoid TUG technique shall be applied as follows. Patient in the supine position. The inner hand of the intervener makes contact with the pisiform through the hypothenar eminence and ulnar border of the hand over the scaphoid tubercle, the outer hand reinforces the contact. The thumbs are directed to the sole of the patient's foot. The parameters are sought by bringing the sole of the foot into eversion, thus bringing the scaphoid into internal rotation (the direction of correction). In order to reduce the slack, the operator drops his body weight backwards while increasing the internal rotation parameter of the scaphoid. The manipulation is performed by associating a rapid traction movement with an increase of the correction parameter towards the internal rotation of the scaphoid.
• Sham group: Sham osteopathic manipulation TUG for scaphoid bone
The intervention will be performed in the same way as the intervention group, without actually performing the TUG manipulation on the scaphoid bone, only placing it in tension.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Sergio Montero Navarro	Elche	Alicante

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cardenal Herrera University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (5)

Hessert MJ, Vyas M, Leach J, Hu K, Lipsitz LA, Novak V. Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and old adults. BMC Geriatr. 2005 May 19;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-5-8. — View Citation

Latash ML, Krishnamoorthy V, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM. Postural synergies and their development. Neural Plast. 2005;12(2-3):119-30; discussion 263-72. doi: 10.1155/NP.2005.119. — View Citation

Myklebust JB, Prieto T, Myklebust B. Evaluation of nonlinear dynamics in postural steadiness time series. Ann Biomed Eng. 1995 Nov-Dec;23(6):711-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02584470. — View Citation

Van Buskirk RL. Nociceptive reflexes and the somatic dysfunction: a model. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1990 Sep;90(9):792-4, 797-809. — View Citation

Zhang Y, Kiemel T, Jeka J. The influence of sensory information on two-component coordination during quiet stance. Gait Posture. 2007 Jul;26(2):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Oct 13. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	stabilometric measurements: oscillation about the X-axis	(mm)	five minutes post-intervention
Primary	stabilometric measurements: oscillation about the Y-axis	(mm)	five minutes post-intervention
Primary	stabilometric measurements: area of the ellipse	(cm2)	five minutes post-intervention
Primary	static baropodometric measurements: scan Foot bearing area	(cm2)	five minutes post-intervention
Primary	static baropodometric measurements: scan percentage of body load supported by each foot		five minutes post-intervention
Primary	static baropodometric measurements: scan point of maximum plantar pressure	(kg/cm2)	five minutes post-intervention

External Links

•   The University CEU-Cardenal Herrera is th first private university inthe Valencian Community. It belongs to the Foundation San Pablo - CEU andis the leading educational organization in Spain with three Universities all overSpain