Malocclusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Orthodontic build-ups are made by composite/resin material bonded to the palatal or occlusal
surfaces of teeth (usually molars or incisors). Their primary purpose is to prevent heavy
contact of the upper teeth with lower fixed appliances in patients with overbite reduction to
avoid brackets detachment. These appliances disarticulate the posterior teeth, deprogram the
masticatory muscles and allow for eruption, extrusion, and uprighting of the posterior teeth.
Build-ups are usually placed in the first months of the fixed orthodontic treatment and
contribute to increasing the perception of pain. In the orthodontic daily practice, the pain
is the most frequent symptom during treatment and is the one that most frightens/worries the
patients. Literature shows that fear of pain is one of the primary reasons that patients fail
to seek orthodontic care. Pain has a negative effect on patients' compliance, oral hygiene,
and missed appointments. Its effects on patients' daily lives is a major reason for
discontinuance of orthodontic treatment.
In the literature the prevention of pain and management of orthodontic builds-ups is a poorly
analyzed topic, despite being a daily problem in orthodontic clinical practice. So, the aim
of the present study is to investigate and analyze the perception of pain and function
impairment with different type of build-ups (anterior or posterior) to identify an efficient
clinical management protocol and an effective pain and discomfort prevention strategy.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | September 30, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | September 30, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 9 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patient with reduced overbite treated with orthodontic fixed appliance - Angle Class I, Class II or Class III malocclusion Exclusion Criteria: - Hypodontia in any quadrant excluding third molars - Craniofacial syndromes, or cleft lip or palate |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | Alessandro Ugolini | Genova | GE |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Genova |
Italy,
Antoun JS, Thomson WM, Merriman TR, Rongo R, Farella M. Impact of skeletal divergence on oral health-related quality of life and self-reported jaw function. Korean J Orthod. 2017 May;47(3):186-194. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.186. Epub 2017 Mar 13. — View Citation
Corridore D, Campus G, Guerra F, Ripari F, Sale S, Ottolenghi L. Validation of the Italian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (IOHIP-14). Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014 Feb 4;4(3-4):239-43. eCollection 2013 Jul-Dec. — View Citation
Kravitz N, Jorgensen G, Frey S, Cope J. Resin bite turbos. J Clin Orthod. 2018 Sep;52(9):456-461. — View Citation
Pativetpinyo D, Supronsinchai W, Changsiripun C. Immediate effects of temporary bite-raising with light-cured orthodontic band cement on the electromyographic response of masticatory muscles. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 May 14;26:e20170214. doi: 10.1590/1678-77 — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Overbite correction [Millimeters] | Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters) | 1 week | |
Primary | Overbite correction [Millimeters] | Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters) | 1 months | |
Primary | Overbite correction [Millimeters] | Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters) | 2 months | |
Primary | Overbite correction [Millimeters] | Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, millimeters) | 3 months | |
Primary | Overbite correction [Time] | Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, months) | 1 months | |
Primary | Overbite correction [Time] | Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, months) | 2 months | |
Primary | Overbite correction [Time] | Overbite Clinical evaluation in vivo (continuous outcome, months) | 3 months | |
Primary | Pain after builds-up placement | Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain. | 1 week | |
Primary | Pain after builds-up placement | Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain. | 1 months | |
Primary | Pain after builds-up placement | Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain. | 2 months | |
Primary | Pain after builds-up placement | Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the level of pain. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is most commonly a straight 100-mm line, without demarcation, that has the words "no pain" at the left-most end and "worst pain imaginable" (or something similar) at the right-most end. Patients are instructed to place a mark on the line indicating the amount of pain that they feel at the time of the evaluation. The distance of this mark from the left end is then measured, and this number is used as a numeric representation of the severity of the patient's pain. | 3 months | |
Primary | Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement | Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents | 1 week | |
Primary | Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement | Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents | 1 months | |
Primary | Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement | Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents | 2 months | |
Primary | Oral Health Impact Profile after builds-up placement | Instrument of data collection was OHIP-14 questionnaire, which comprises of 14 questions with two questions each under seven domains. The domains include; functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the questions are based on a Likert scale which ranged from 0- "never" to 4- "very often". Variables also included in the questionnaire were: demographic variables and satisfaction ratings of teeth appearance and self- rating of tooth condition. The satisfaction ratings of tooth appearance assessed how satisfied the participants were with the appearance of their teeth with a response of "satisfied or dissatisfied". The self- rating of tooth condition assessed oral condition as being "good or poor". The satisfaction ratings and self-ratings of oral health were variables used to assess the construct validity of OHIP-14 in the respondents | 3 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02914431 -
Personalized Titanium Plates vs CAD/CAM Surgical Splints in Maxillary Repositioning of Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05383820 -
Effect of Paracetamol and Ketorolac on RANK-L Levels in Patients Starting Orthodontic Treatment
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03794726 -
Comparison of Orthodontic Molar Protraction With and Without Adjunctive Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03513003 -
The Use of a Pacifier to Correct Malocclusions in Young Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02603289 -
One Week Aligner Evaluation
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01210547 -
Three-dimensional Assessment of Craniofacial Structures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01463839 -
Sleep Disorder and Oral Habits in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04946201 -
Premolar Extractions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children With Overjet
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04117360 -
Orthognathic Speech Pathology: Phonetic Contrasts of Patients With Dental Discrepancies Pre- and Post-Treatment Analyses
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06291129 -
Gingival Health and Malocclusion Among Type 1 Diabetic Children and Adolescents
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05684510 -
Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02659813 -
Orthodontic Archwire Effectiveness Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02427763 -
Microbiological and Epithelial Evaluation Related to the Use of Orthodontic Thermoplastic Device
|
Phase 0 | |
Completed |
NCT01962012 -
Effect of AcceleDent® Aura on Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Aligners
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02267811 -
The Effect of OrthoPulseā¢ on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03405961 -
A Comparison of Conventional Versus Digital PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Scores Using an Intraoral Scanner
|
||
Completed |
NCT05356780 -
Predictability of Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Invisalign Aligners
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06218641 -
Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05711160 -
Comparison of the Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Made on CBCT and IOS Images With Their made-on Plaster Models.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06140043 -
Augmented Reality for Orthognatic Surgery Patient Education
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |