Malocclusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of 3M Clear Aligner for Correction of Class I, II and III Malocclusion Study
Verified date | November 2020 |
Source | 3M |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Clear Aligners to correct tooth malocclusions with the use of attachments and/or buttons, as determined by the amount of teeth movement and overall achievement goals of the treatment plan.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 52 |
Est. completion date | October 9, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | October 9, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 14 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subject is at least 14 years of age. 2. Subject is willing and able to give informed consent. 3. Subject is willing to be digitally scanned at each 6-week visit, including after application of attachments. 4. Subject has a need for single or double arch orthodontic treatment with a target duration of 18 months or less. 5. Subject has good oral hygiene defined by the orthodontist. 6. Subject has only permanent dentition. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject has skeletal discrepancies requiring surgery 2. Subject is undergoing active dental work 3. Subject has severe open bite > 2 mm 4. Subject has severe overjet > 4 mm 5. Subject has deep bite > 3 mm 6. Subject has over crowding per arch > 4 mm 7. Subject has dental prostheses/implants that will interfere with projected teeth movement 8. Subject is taking systemic steroid medication 9. Subject is taking Biphosphonates or any other medication for treatment of osteoporosis |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Orthodontics Associates | Catonsville | Maryland |
United States | Benson Orthodontics | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Mellion Orthodontics | Fairlawn | Ohio |
United States | Depew Orthodontics | Kennesaw | Georgia |
United States | Simply Smiles Orthodontics | McKinney | Texas |
United States | Wolf/Chhibber Orthodontics | Norwalk | Ohio |
United States | Riolo Orthodontics | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Henseler Orthodontics | Woodbury | Minnesota |
United States | Horton Orthodontics | Woodbury | Minnesota |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
3M |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Successful Correction of Malocclusion | Achievement of target setup per treatment plan as determined by Orthodontist. | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Individual Tooth Movement | Achievement of individual tooth movement measured per treatment plan and digital scan | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Treatment Time for Tooth Movement | Achievement of individual tooth movement measured per treatment plan | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Effective Use of Attachments | Effective use of attachment by tracking attachment bond failures by visual assessment | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Orthodontist Satisfaction | Orthodontist satisfaction with treatment outcome | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Software Satisfaction | Orthodontist satisfaction with treatment management software -Ease of use in ordering products | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Aligner Comfort | Aligner comfortable to wear | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Appearance Satisfaction | Subject satisfaction with appearance during treatment | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Aligner Ease of Cleaning | Subject satisfaction with ease of cleaning during treatment | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Ease of Insertion | Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically aligners easy to insert | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Mid Course Corrections/Refinements Needed | Number of mid course refinements or corrections | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. | |
Secondary | Ease of Aligner Removal | Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically with aligner removal | The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02914431 -
Personalized Titanium Plates vs CAD/CAM Surgical Splints in Maxillary Repositioning of Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05383820 -
Effect of Paracetamol and Ketorolac on RANK-L Levels in Patients Starting Orthodontic Treatment
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03794726 -
Comparison of Orthodontic Molar Protraction With and Without Adjunctive Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03513003 -
The Use of a Pacifier to Correct Malocclusions in Young Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02603289 -
One Week Aligner Evaluation
|
||
Completed |
NCT01463839 -
Sleep Disorder and Oral Habits in Children
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01210547 -
Three-dimensional Assessment of Craniofacial Structures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04946201 -
Premolar Extractions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children With Overjet
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04117360 -
Orthognathic Speech Pathology: Phonetic Contrasts of Patients With Dental Discrepancies Pre- and Post-Treatment Analyses
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06291129 -
Gingival Health and Malocclusion Among Type 1 Diabetic Children and Adolescents
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05684510 -
Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02659813 -
Orthodontic Archwire Effectiveness Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02427763 -
Microbiological and Epithelial Evaluation Related to the Use of Orthodontic Thermoplastic Device
|
Phase 0 | |
Completed |
NCT02267811 -
The Effect of OrthoPulse™ on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01962012 -
Effect of AcceleDent® Aura on Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Aligners
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03405961 -
A Comparison of Conventional Versus Digital PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Scores Using an Intraoral Scanner
|
||
Completed |
NCT05356780 -
Predictability of Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Invisalign Aligners
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06218641 -
Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05711160 -
Comparison of the Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Made on CBCT and IOS Images With Their made-on Plaster Models.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06140043 -
Augmented Reality for Orthognatic Surgery Patient Education
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |