Evaluation of the Levels of Pain & Discomfort Between Two Methods of

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Applying flapless piezocision corticotomies on the alveolar bone and separating anterior mandibular teeth using a piezosurgery device (i.e. ultrasonic waves that perform very accurate incisions without any sutures following this procedure) may improve the speed of tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment. This study consists of two groups, patients will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups. The levels of pain and discomfort of this procedure on 18 patients (experimental group) will be evaluated,whereas the second group (control group) will receive a traditional orthodontic therapy.

Clinical Trial Description

According to the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO), the length of comprehensive orthodontic treatment ranges between 18-30 months, depending on treatment options and individual characteristics. In addition, orthodontic treatment time ranges between 25-35 months for extraction therapies, respectively. Reducing orthodontic treatment time is one of the main goals for orthodontists, due to problems such as root resorption, periodontal disease and caries that are associated with prolonged treatment time.

Many techniques have been introduced to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement; surgical and non-surgical. The surgical approach is the most clinically applied and most tested with known predictions and stable results. Surgical approaches usually vary from total block osteotomies to flapless partial corticotomies .In spite of corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment efficiency, the invasiveness of these procedures (i.e. requiring full mucoperiosteal flaps elevation) might have limited their widespread acceptance among orthodontists and patients. Therefore, more conservative flapless corticotomy techniques have recently been proposed. These procedures can be accomplished in a reasonably short periods that might produce less pain and discomfort, so we will gain better patient acceptance. Although various techniques of flapless corticotomy have been reported to be successful in practice, scientific evidence on their acceptance and compatibility is little in the literature. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02975765
Study type	Interventional
Source	Damascus University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	March 2016
Completion date	April 23, 2017

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT02914431` - Personalized Titanium Plates vs CAD/CAM Surgical Splints in Maxillary Repositioning of Orthognathic Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05383820` - Effect of Paracetamol and Ketorolac on RANK-L Levels in Patients Starting Orthodontic Treatment	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03794726` - Comparison of Orthodontic Molar Protraction With and Without Adjunctive Surgery	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03513003` - The Use of a Pacifier to Correct Malocclusions in Young Children	N/A
Completed	`NCT02603289` - One Week Aligner Evaluation
Terminated	`NCT01210547` - Three-dimensional Assessment of Craniofacial Structures	N/A
Completed	`NCT01463839` - Sleep Disorder and Oral Habits in Children	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04946201` - Premolar Extractions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children With Overjet
Recruiting	`NCT04117360` - Orthognathic Speech Pathology: Phonetic Contrasts of Patients With Dental Discrepancies Pre- and Post-Treatment Analyses
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06291129` - Gingival Health and Malocclusion Among Type 1 Diabetic Children and Adolescents	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05684510` - Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02659813` - Orthodontic Archwire Effectiveness Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT02427763` - Microbiological and Epithelial Evaluation Related to the Use of Orthodontic Thermoplastic Device	Phase 0
Completed	`NCT01962012` - Effect of AcceleDent® Aura on Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Aligners	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02267811` - The Effect of OrthoPulse™ on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement	N/A
Completed	`NCT03405961` - A Comparison of Conventional Versus Digital PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Scores Using an Intraoral Scanner
Completed	`NCT05356780` - Predictability of Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Invisalign Aligners
Recruiting	`NCT06218641` - Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols	N/A
Completed	`NCT05711160` - Comparison of the Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Made on CBCT and IOS Images With Their made-on Plaster Models.
Recruiting	`NCT06140043` - Augmented Reality for Orthognatic Surgery Patient Education	Phase 2/Phase 3

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Between Two Methods of Correcting Misaligned Teeth

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms