View clinical trials related to Malocclusion, Angle Class II.
Filter by:The aim of the present clinical study was directed to evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of canine retraction; in addition, the potential risk for root resorption during maxillary canine retraction.
to evaluate effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on mandibular condylar volume and position after treatment of Class II malocclusion with Twin Block (TB) functional therapy via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: Twenty eight growing patients, 14 boys and 14 girls ranged in age 9-12 years, were randomly divided into control group (mean initial age 10.64±1.36 years) and laser group (mean initial age 10.55 1.45 years). All patients treated with TB appliance where Gallium aluminum arsenide diode laser applied in one group weekly around TMJ region for 12 sessions in three months with set parameters: continuous 635 nm, 50 mW, 4.5J/cm2, 45 seconds/ point, total dose per side 11.25J. CBCT were obtained before and immediately after TB therapy, in addition to routine orthodontic records. Changes in TMJ and skeletal variables were analyzed and compared within and between both groups.
The purpose of this study is to compare the Full Fixed Preadjusted appliances (regular braces) when to the BRIUS system.
The study aimed to evaluate the influence of a 635nm diode laser on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants in vitro, as well as mini-implants failure rate (mini-implant loss) and patients pain level after the treatment. A randomized clinical split-mouth trial was concluded with 22 subjects (14 women, 8 men), 44 orthodontic mini-implants with a diameter 1.4mm and length of 10mm. Mini-implants were placed between teeth 3 and 4; and 13 and 14 (Universal Numbering System), in the area of the attached gingiva, 2 mm below mucogingival junction.
The study aimed to clinically estimate an influence of a 635nm diode laser on the primary and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants placed in a maxilla, to assess mini-implants failure rate (mini-implant loss) and to evaluate a pain level after the treatment. The randomized clinical split-mouth trial included 15 subjects, 30 implants (Dual Top Anchor System, Seoul, Korea) with a diameter 1.4mm and length of 10mm. Mini-implants were placed in the area of the attached gingiva between the second premolar and first molar teeth 2 mm below the mucogingival junction of both sides of the maxilla in 20 patients (13 women and 7 men; age: 32.5 ± 6.1 years).
The study aimed to estimate clinically an influence of 635nm diode laser on the primary and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants placed in a maxilla, to assess mini-implants failure rate (mini-implant loss) and to evaluate a pain level after the treatment. The randomized clinical split-mouth trial included 15 subjects, 30 implants (Dual Top Anchor System, Seoul, Korea) with a diameter 1.4mm and length of 10mm. Mini-implants were placed in the area of the attached gingiva between the second premolar and first molar teeth 2 mm below the mucogingival junction of both sides of the maxilla in 15 patients.
The study is to evaluate the effect of 3D printed modified Twin Block Appliance on skeletal Class II profile correction. The null hypothesis of this research is that use of 3D Printed Twin Block is not able to induce skeletal rather than dental effects for correction of the skeletal Class II malocclusion in comparison with untreated growing Class II control subjects.
The long time needed for orthodontic treatment is considered one of the biggest obstacles that make patients refuse to undergo orthodontic treatment. It also has many disadvantages including higher caries rates, gingivitis, and root resorption. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of two new noninvasive methods (Low-Level Laser Therapy and Corticopuncture) in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement for the implant supported En-Masse retraction of the six maxillary anterior teeth.
Importance and justification The importance of carrying out this study is to verify the electrical activity generated by the masticatory muscles to be able to have clarity of their performance in the development of orthopedic treatment, thus complementing the diagnosis to achieve a more successful treatment with myofunctional device SN1 in Class II malocclusions. In addition, with the results of this study, treatment prediction criteria are provided to the clinician, depending on the thickness of the muscle, more specific equipment will be chosen to solve the malocclusion and prognosis when using the SN1 myofunctional device in class II malocclusions. Additionally, it has academic utility, since there is little scientific evidence about myofunctional SN1 device and its impact on masticatory muscles, thus opening the door to a line of research where this study can be used as a basis for future orthopedic clinical research. in UNICIEO. Added to this and according to the results, the knowledge about the SN1 will be updated, thus providing evidence for the teaching of orthopedics for the students; and also a measurement protocol with electromyography for children will be provided Overall objective To evaluate the electrical activity of the masseter and temporal muscles in patients from 7 to 12 years of age, with skeletal class II who are under treatment with myofunctional apparatus (Sn1), in the UNICIEO orthopedics clinic by means of kinesiological electromyography compare with a control group without use of the device Specific objectives - Determine the activity of the masseter and temporal muscles of patients at rest (without functional orthopedic apparatus) in the two study groups. - To determine the activity of the masseter and temporal muscles of the patients after the use of functional orthopedic equipment (Sn1), after six months of treatment and in the control group without treatment.
The aim of the study is to compare an Infra-zygomatic Mini implant supported appliance with headgear in distalization and intrusion of maxillary dentition for treatment of growing patients with class II malocclusion (maxillary excess)