View clinical trials related to Malaria.
Filter by:Background: - Malaria is a severe infection caused by a parasite. People can get malaria if a mosquito that carries the parasite bites them. Malaria infection does not happen in the United States, but many people in Africa, Asia, and South America are at risk for it. Researchers want to test two vaccines that may help decrease malaria infection. Objective: - To see if two vaccines (Pfs25M-EPA/Alhydrogel and Pfs230DIM-EPA/Alhydrogel ) are safe in humans and cause an immune response that will prevent malaria parasites from correctly growing in the mosquito. Eligibility: - Healthy adults ages 18 50. Design: - There are several groups in this study. Each group will receive a different dose of the vaccine and some groups will received both vaccines. - Vaccinations will be given on two days about 4 weeks apart. - Participants will receive each vaccine as an injection into the arm. Blood will be drawn on the day of vaccination. - In the 4 weeks after receiving a vaccination, participants will have at least 3 clinic visits and 1 phone contact. They will have at least 3 more visits and 3 phone contacts over the next 6 months. - At each visit, participants will be evaluated for side effects to the vaccine and any new health changes or problems. They will be asked how they are feeling and if they have taken any medicine. Blood and urine samples may be taken at the visit. More follow-up visits may be needed to follow up on changes or problems.
To quantify the relative effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of fMDA and MDA with DHAp against no mass treatment for reducing P. falciparum parasite prevalence, confirmed OPD malaria case incidence and cohort infection incidence in areas of high and low malaria transmission and in a program-relevant manner that will permit adoption and adaptation for wider-scale deployment.
This is a prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine in children and adults with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection. Molecular markers for antimalarial resistance will also be assessed and the presence of molecular markers in the parasites will be associated with treatment outcomes.
This is a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the impact of two community based malaria interventions: reactive case detection (RACD) vs reactive targeted presumptive treatment (focal mass drug administration, fMDA) on the incidence of malaria in Swaziland.
Study designed to evaluate safety and tolerability of a genetically attenuated P. falciparum (GAP3KO) that arrests early in the liver stage of the parasite life cycle. Study will also confirm the attenuation of the GAP3KO parasites using peripheral blood smears. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the humoral immune responses to GAP3KO.
INDEPTH Network Effectiveness and Safety Studies in Africa (INESS) have demonstrated a substantial efficacy decay of Artemisinin based combination therapy (ACT) in Tanzania in 2012 (from efficacy of 98% to effectiveness of 18%). Hence system readiness for control and elimination strategies is severely compromised. Sub-optimal health workers' performance in treating malaria cases was a major contributor to the decay, effecting both treatment and patient adherence. If these quantified system failures remain unchecked it will pose major barrier in achieving malaria control and elimination goals. There is growing evidence that mobile phone text message reminders can improve health workers' compliance and patients' adherence to malaria treatment guidelines. Tanzania has recently harnessed all public sector health worker phones into Short Message System (SMS) platform. The investigators intend to exploit this opportunity in a randomized trial of messages to substantially reduce the decay documented by the INESS platform. The null hypothesis: Sending automated text message reminders to health workers on malaria diagnosis and treatment recommendations, will not have any effects in the quality of malaria case management.
This is a two-arm, randomized, open label Treatment Study evaluating the therapeutic efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a three-day course of Atovaquone-Proguanil (AP) or a three-day course of Atovaquone-Proguanil combined with 3 days of Artesunate (ASAP) in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria at selected sites in Cambodia. Atovaquone-proguanil, soon to adopted as a first line antimalarial agent by the National Malaria Control Program (CNM) in Cambodia in provinces with confirmed multidrug resistance, will be given with or without artesunate (AS) as a directly observed, standard three-day fixed dose combination treatment to all volunteers enrolled. The efficacy and safety of both drug combination as well as evidence for in vivo and in vitro resistance to their components will be monitored during the treatment period. All volunteers will receive a single dose of 15mg of primaquine as recommended by WHO with the first dose of AP or ASAP to block the transmission of malaria to mosquitoes. Resistance to AP and ASAP will be assessed by a combination of clinical, pharmacologic, and parasitological parameters including genomic signatures of selection during careful weekly follow-up visits for 6 weeks. Investigators will also be able to evaluate the effects of primaquine on the sexual stages of malaria (gametocytes).
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate and quantify the protective efficacy (PE) of spatial repellent products in reducing the incidence of malaria infection in human cohorts. The null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no difference in malaria incidence between intervention and control arms.
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate and quantify the protective efficacy (PE) of spatial repellent products in reducing the incidence of malaria infection in human cohorts. The null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no difference in malaria incidence between intervention and control arms.
The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate and quantify the protective efficacy (PE) of spatial repellent products in reducing the incidence of malaria infection in human cohorts. The null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no difference in malaria incidence between intervention and control arms.