View clinical trials related to Malaria.
Filter by:Targeted malaria elimination (TME), which comprises appropriate case management by village health workers, vector control and mass drug administration, is currently being implemented through pilot projects in selected villages in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) and the scale-up of the intervention to the regional level are underway. Based on mathematical modelling, extending the post-TME parasitaemia-free period in the majority of villagers for as short as 200 days will substantially increase the chances of achieving the interruption of malaria transmission. Immunogenicity of RTS,S is greater in older children, and the short term malaria protective effect is stronger than the overall effect assessed over 1-2 years. Addition of mass RTS,S/AS01E vaccination to the TME arsenal could provide this much needed additional protection. Currently there are no safety and immunogenicity data for the use of RTS,S/AS01 in Asian populations. This trial will generate the required data for the use of this vaccine in Asian populations. For integration with the current TME activities, which provide mass drug administrations at months M0, M1, and M2, it would be most efficient and practical to provide the vaccine at the same intervals. To address a two round intervention (M0, M2) where a three round intervention is not feasible, one study arm will look at the immune response generated by only two doses of vaccine and antimalarial medications. Recent evidence suggests that a vaccination schedule which includes a fractional dose of RTS,S/AS01 (1/5th of the standard dose) could be similarly or more protective than a schedule with three standard full doses, while requiring less vaccine and resources. The trial therefore includes study arms which will assess the safety and immunogenicity of fractional dose schedules. Each participant will be randomized into one of the following study arms in a ratio of 20:20:30:30:30:30:30, as follows: - RTS,S/AS01B Fractional dose group (Group 1) - Double RTS,S /AS01E Fractional dose group (Group 2) - RTS,S/AS01E Standard dose group (Group 3) - RTS,S/AS01E + DHA-PIP+PQ Standard dose group (Group 4) - RTS,S/AS01E Fractional dose group (Group 5) - RTS,S/AS01E + DHA-PIP+PQ Fractional dose group (Group 6) - RTS,S/AS01E + DHA-PIP+PQ Fractional two-dose group (Group 7)
This is an observational study (case-control study) aiming to identify risk factors for malaria infection in health centers or malaria posts or district hospitals in Buntharik District and Nachalui District, Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. This study expects to recruit 330 cases (malaria positive) and 330 control (negative cases) subject. One-to-one matching of cases (malaria positive) and controls (malaria negative) will be done at each study site. CASE (Malaria positive) subject will go through the following; 1. Enrollment visit (Day 0) 1.1 Blood collection of three dried blood spots, and malaria slide. In district hospitals in individuals >14 kg: additional 10ml venous blood will be collected. 1.2 A survey questionnaire which includes patient demographics, information on malaria treatment, bed net use and possible risk factors for acquiring malaria, as well as questions about their travel and usage of mobile phones will be administered. 2. Follow up visits (if fever plus Day 42 (+/-3)) 2.1 Blood collection of three dried blood spots and malaria slide. In district hospitals: additional 0.5ml venous blood will be collected. 2.2 Short survey questionnaire including questions on symptoms, travel and possible risk behaviors since enrollment will be administered. CONTROL (Malaria negative) subject will go through the following; 1. Enrollment visit (Day 0) 1.1 Blood collection to confirm negative malaria slide. In district hospitals: additional 0.5ml venous blood will be collected. 1.2 A survey questionnaire including patient demographics, information on any recent malaria treatment they may have taken, bed net use and possible risk factors for acquiring malaria, as well as questions about their travel and usage of mobile phones will be administered. 2. Follow up visit: No follow up visit
This study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of community-based mass screening with a malaria rapid diagnostic test, and treatment of participants with positive tests with an appropriate antimalarial for reducing malaria transmission indices.
Background: Malaria is a serious disease. It is passed by infected mosquitoes. In many parts of Africa, malaria continues to be the main cause of death in young children and pregnant women. Researchers want to find out more about how malaria affects pregnant women and their babies. Objectives: To study the rate of miscarriage and stillbirth during the second and third trimesters among women in a certain district in Mali. To study rates of malaria infection over time among pregnant women and children in this area. Eligibility: Pregnant women of any age and pregnancy stage and their newborns. They must live in Ouelessebougou, Mali. Children up to 10 years old who live there. Design: Information about the study will be shared at community meetings, during visits to the health centers, and during census updates. Participants will read and sign a consent form. Pregnant women will be screened to see if they are eligible. They may have a urine test. They may have an ultrasound to date their pregnancy. Ultrasound uses sound waves to take pictures of the body. Women will be enrolled in the study after they have their babies. Participants may have a physical exam. Some participants will provide a finger/heel prick blood sample. Participants will complete a questionnaire. They will be asked about: Medical history Antimalarial and other interventions Socioeconomic status Their pregnancy Previous pregnancies Health of their newborn...
The present study assesses the pharmacokinetic profile of Ivermectin (IVM) in healthy human volunteers and aims to create a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model. Planned indication is the prevention of malaria transmission.
Background: Researchers are looking for new ways to control and eradicate malaria. They want to test vaccines to block malaria transmission in adults in Mali. These vaccines work by inducing antibodies in a person. The antibody is then taken up with blood by a mosquito that bites the person. This blocks parasite development in the mosquito. This stops malaria transmission to another person. Objective: To test the safety, reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and transmission-blocking activity of the vaccines Pfs25M-EPA and Pfs230D1M-EPA with AS01 in Malian adults. Eligibility: Healthy Malians ages 18-50 living in certain areas in Mali who: Are not pregnant or breastfeeding Are not infected with HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Do not have evidence of immunodeficiency Do not have history of severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis Design: Participants will be screened with: Medical history Physical exam Malaria Comprehension Exam Blood and urine tests Electrocardiogram (for participants in certain study groups) Participants will be randomly assigned to a study group. Participants will be monitored for 12-16 months. For the first 7 months, they will have between 1 and nine visits a month. The number depends on the month and on what group they are in. For the rest of the months, they will have 1 monthly visit. Each visit includes a physical exam. Most include blood tests. Participants will get 3 doses of a study or comparator vaccine. They get the vaccine through an injection in the upper arm. This occurs at their first visit, then 1 month later, and then 5 months later. Participants will be followed for at least 6 months after the last vaccine. If participants develop an injection site rash or reaction, photographs may be taken of the site.
The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is among the countries most affected by malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa. Condidering its size and the geographic position, the DRC is meant to play a major role in the malaria control in the region. The National Malaria Control program recommends artemisinin-based combination treatments (ACTs), in particular artesunate-amodiaquine or artemether-lumefrantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Previous studies indicated that ACTs are still effective, with efficacy above the required threshold of 90%. It is required to assess regularly the efficacy of antimalarial drugs, in order to ascertain the relevance of treatment guidelines such that, in case of increasing failure rates, alternative options can be decided ontime. The purpose of this trial is to assess efficacy and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ Winthrop®), artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem Dispersible®) and dihydro-artemisinin-piperaquine (Eurartesim®) at day 42 in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in six surveillance sites around DRC.
Purpose While there is strong evidence that permethrin treated clothing prevents insect bites there is insufficient evidence from trials to demonstrate a reduction in infections. The evidence that topical insect repellants prevent malaria is more robust, but studies in civilian suffer from poor compliance. It is not known if there is an added benefit from combining the two. The effectiveness of permethrin-treated uniforms with and without DEET lotion are compared in a 2x2 design in Mgambo Jeshi la Kujenga Taifa (JKT) military camp in Tanga region. The four arms are: 1) combined intervention group receiving permethrin treated uniform (PTU) and 30% DEET (diethyl toluamide) liposome formula; 2) permethrin intervention group receiving PTU and placebo lotion; 3) DEET intervention group receiving untreated army combat uniform (ACU) and 30% DEET liposome formula; 4) placebo group receiving untreated ACU and placebo lotion. Both participants and investigators will be blinded to treatment allocation. The outcome measure is the incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection measured by Polymerase Chain Reaction every month by active case detection.
Microscopy remains a key indicator in drug efficacy testing performed in the context of clinical trials for monitoring existing antimalarials or in the context of regulatory clinical trials for registration of new drugs. It is one of the main diagnostic methods for malaria diagnosis in general, as in an ideal setting it can provide low-cost accurate diagnosis, determine the density of parasites in the blood, and accurately differentiate between different malaria parasite species, characteristics vital to the implementation of global plans for drug efficacy monitoring. Malaria rapid tests (RDTs), while useful for case management, do not provide information on the parasite density nor the species differentiation necessary for research and drug efficacy assessment. Microscopy therefore retains key advantages over a number of newer technologies, but its reliability is severely impeded by dependence on high technical competence of the human operators as well as availability of high quality equipment and reagents. Recent studies have demonstrated the frequent poor specificity and sensitivity associated with manual microscopy diagnostics in operational conditions , , . Advances in digital microscopy performance and affordability have now opened the door to potentially significant improvements in the performance of malaria diagnostic microscopy, overcoming serious deficiencies in current drug efficacy assessment, and more broadly in malaria diagnosis and management. Intellectual Ventures Laboratory (IVL), in collaboration with Global Good Fund (GG), has developed an initial microscope prototype to support its research into dark field imaging of unstained malaria slides. The system consists of low cost electromechanical components for scanning a standard slide, an optical train with a high numerical aperture objective, and an image capture system. Captured images are analyzed with custom image analysis software developed at GG/IVL, using algorithms that are designed for automatic malaria diagnosis, without user input. Additionally, image processing algorithms have been built around detection of Giemsa-stained malaria slides which is the current standard for malaria microscopy. Initial results show excellent potential for sensitivity and specificity which exceeds that of typical manual microscopists in the field. Based on the positive market and needs assessment in January, 2013, given by stakeholders in the malaria diagnostics community, GG/IVL are pursuing improvement and integration of this algorithm into a portable microscope platform with characteristics similar to the prototype microscope already developed at GG/IVL for dark field imaging. The prototype Autoscope was first tested in field settings in Thailand in Nov 2014 - Jan 2015 at clinics operated by the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU). The goal of the first field evaluation was to assess the Autoscope in with respect to its diagnostic performance and also its suitability for harsh conditions typically encountered in field clinics. Further, user feedback on the design and functionality was sought. The Autoscope and the accompanying image analysis algorithms have since been further developed and a new version is now available for testing.
This is an open-label, multi-centre Phase I/IIa dose escalation blood-stage malaria CHMI trial to assess the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the candidate malaria vaccine RH5.1/AS01. All volunteers recruited will be healthy, malaria naïve adults aged between 18 and 45 years. Volunteers will be recruited and vaccinated at the CCVTM, Oxford; Guys and St Thomas' NIHR CRF, London; and the NIHR WTCRF, Southampton for the Phase Ia part of the trial, and at the CCVTM, Oxford and Guys and St Thomas' NIHR CRF, London for the Phase IIa stage.