View clinical trials related to Malaria, Falciparum.
Filter by:In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), malaria is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that malaria is responsible for 30% of admissions to hospital averaged throughout the country and for 25-30% mortality in children under five. In 2005, DRC adopted artesunate and amodiaquine (ASAQ) as first-line anti-malarial treatment. As WHO recommended that the efficacy of antimalarial drugs was monitored regularly to avoid an upsurge of mortality and morbidity due to continued use of ineffective drugs, a randomized, non-inferiority open-label trial was conducted in Katanga, in order to compare the efficacy of the fixed-dose formulation ASAQ versus artemether-lumefantrine (AL), Children aged six and 59 months with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were enrolledand randomly allocated into one of the two regimens. The risk of recurrent parasitaemia by day 42, both unadjusted and adjusted by PCR genotyping to distinguish recrudescence from new infection, was analysed. Between April 2008 and March 2009, 301 childrenwere included: 156 with ASAQ and 145 with AL. No early treatment failures were reported. Among the 256 patients followed-up at day 42, 32 patients developed late clinical or parasitological failure (9.9% (13/131) in the ASAQ group and 15.2% (19/125) in the AL group). After PCR correction, cure rates were 98.3% (95%CI, 94.1-99.8) in the ASAQ group and 99.1% (95%CI, 94.9-99.9) in the AL group (difference -0.7%, one sided 95%CI -3.1). Kaplan-Meier PCR-adjusted cure rates were similar. Both treatment regimens were generally well tolerated. Both ASAQ and AL are highly effective and currently adequate as the first-line treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in this area of Katanga, DRC. However, in a very large country such as DRC, and because of possible emergence of resistance from other endemic regions, surveillance of efficacy of artemisinin-based combination treatments, including other evaluations of the resistance of ASAQ, need to be done in other provinces.
The purpose of this study is to see if two new malaria vaccines called FMP1 and RTSS, combined with an adjuvant (called SBAS2) which helps stimulate the body's immune system, are safe, demonstrate an immune response through blood tests, and lastly, to see if the vaccines can prevent malaria infection. The RTS,S vaccine contains a malaria protein in combination with a portion of the commercially available hepatitis B vaccine. The FMP1 vaccine also contains a malaria protein. The adjuvant called SBAS2, is a special oil in water emulsion. Vaccinations are done at study days 0, 28 and 84, followed by a malaria challenge approximately 14 days after the 3rd vaccination.
Malaria has remained a major concern for the US military. During World War II, malaria was the leading cause of disease and non-battle injury with 500-700 men infected per day, resulting in 24,000 malaria-related casualties.(10) Currently, the methods used for protecting troops against malaria are insecticidal nets, clothing, and antimalarial treatment. To be effective, these methods must be self-administered and be used consistently, often unattainable in field or combat situations. The United States Army Medical Research and Development Command (USAMRMC), through the United States Army Medical Materiel Development Activity (USAMMDA) and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) are actively pursuing the development of an effective vaccine against P. falciparum malaria; development of such a vaccine is a high priority for the US military and other individuals who travel to endemic regions, and is equally important to populations residing in those areas. A Phase 1 study using FMP012, a recombinant E.coli expressed malaria protein (CelTOS) vaccine will 1. assess the safety and reactogenicity of candidate P. falciparum malaria vaccine FMP012/GLA-SE Secondary: 2. measure the humoral immune response to FMP012/GLA-SE using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) 3. assess the protective efficacy of FMP012/GLA-SE against a P. falciparum sporozoite challenge.
This is an open label uncontrolled study to determine the efficacy of fosmidomycin and clindamycin when co-administered orally over three days in the treatment of acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children. The primary study endpoints will be the cure rate on Day 28 (PCR corrected). The secondary endpoints will be the cure rate on Day 7 and the parasite and fever clearance times.
Title: Efficacy and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine combined with methylene blue for falciparum malaria treatment in African children: randomised controlled trial. Design: Mono-centre, two arms, open randomized controlled study in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso. Phase: Phase II. Objectives: The primary objective of this trial is to study the efficacy and safety of the triple therapy artesunate (AS) - amodiaquine (AQ) - methylene blue (MB) given over three days in young children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso compared to the local standard three days artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) AS-AQ regimen. Population: Children aged 6-59 months with uncomplicated falciparum malaria from Nouna Hospital in north-western Burkina Faso. Sample size: 180 patients (90 per study arm).
A randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of azithromycin combination therapy for use in severe malaria. This pilot trial will be conducted in uncomplicated malaria patients in southeastern Bangladesh.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lower doses of primaquine compared to the dose recommended by the WHO for reducing P. falciparum gametocytes in the infected human host to prevent transmission of falciparum malaria to the anopheles mosquito vector.
Because the artemisinins are the most potent antimalarial drugs, the reduction in parasite numbers is rapid. Therefore, early measures of reducing parasite counts are needed. This study will look at conventional markers of parasite reduction e.g. parasite clearance time, parasite reduction ratio, and the time to achieve a fall of 50%, 90% and 99% of the pre-treatment parasitaemia. Defining artemisinin resistance requires the use of artesunate (AS) alone because it is now appreciated that the partner drug in a combination treatment has a significant impact on the rate of parasite clearance. This study will dose patients for 3 days with AS alone (or longer until parasites clear) and measure the parasite count frequently in order to be able to define an accurate regression line of a graph of the natural logarithm of the parasite count (Y axis) versus time (X axis). This will be followed by a full course of an artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). Two different dose regimens of artesunate will be compared at all sites except those in western Cambodia, as unpublished observations from the Thai-Myanmar border suggest the standard lower daily dose of 2mg/kg may enable the earlier detection of low level resistance than a 4mg/kg daily dose.
Background: Malaria is a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality in Malawi. Prompt and effective treatment of uncomplicated malaria remains a key strategy to reduce the public health burden of malaria. Due to the rising resistance to and falling efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, the first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria from 1993 to 2007, the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) revised the national treatment guidelines in 2007. The revised treatment guidelines recommend artemether-lumefantrine as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria and artesunate-amodiaquine as a second-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria. The change in policy was based primarily on efficacy data from other countries in sub-Saharan Africa. However, although both artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine have been in use in Malawi since 2007, there are relatively few studies assessing their efficacy. In a study conducted in 2004-2006 in Blantyre, artemether-lumefantrine was found to be efficacious.1 In addition, a more recent assessment of artemether-lumefantrine in vivo efficacy conducted in six sites in Malawi in 2009 also suggests that the standard formulation artemether-lumefantrine remains highly efficacious (Kamija Phiri, personal communication). Although, some Malawi-specific data on the in vivo efficacy of the standard formulation of artemether-lumefantrine exists, there are additional data that is needed to support the current policy and inform future policy decisions. In 2010 the NMCP has introduced the dispersible formulation of artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem-D™) for use as a first-line antimalarial in Malawi, due to the global unavailability of the standard formulation of artemether-lumefantrine from Novartis, the key supplier of the standard formulation of artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem™) in Malawi. In light of these developments, an assessment of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the dispersible formulation of artemether-lumefantrine is warranted. In addition, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of co-formulated artesunate-amodiaquine, the current secondline treatment for uncomplicated malaria, has never been assessed in Malawi and should be evaluated. Lastly, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine has recently been added to the new World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. This promising new antimalarial might have a role as a first-line or second-line antimalarial for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria, but there are no efficacy and safety data from Malawi. This knowledge gap needs to be addressed to help inform policy makers about the potential role of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Malawi. Objective: Efficacy and safety of the dispersible formulation of artemether-lumefantrine, co-formulated artesunate-amodiaquine and co-formulated dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria at Machinga District Hospital- Malawi Methods: An antimalarial drug efficacy trial will be conducted in Malawi. The participants will be febrile people 6-59 months old with confirmed uncomplicated P. falciparum infection. Patients will be sequentially allocated to receive treatment with either the dispersible formulation of artemether-lumefantrine at a dose of 2/12 mg/kg body weight of artemether and lumefantrine, respectively, per dose, given twice a day for 3 days; or co-formulated artesunate-amodiaquine at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day artesunate and 10 mg/kg/day amodiaquine once a day for 3 days; or co-formulated dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day dihydroartemisinin and 18 mg/kg/day piperaquine once a day for 3 days. Clinical and parasitological parameters will be monitored over a 42-day follow-up period to evaluate drug effi¬cacy. The study will be conducted from January to December, 2011. The results of this study will be used to assist the Ministry of Health in Malawi in assessing the current national treatment guidelines for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.
Background: Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria provide the possibility of a parasite-based diagnosis in areas where good quality microscopy can not be achieved. P. falciparum tests targeting the histidine-rich protein (HRP2) antigen are generally more sensitive than tests targeting the Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antigen. However, as the HRP2 antigen is eliminated from the bloodstream more slowly than the pLDH antigen, HRP2-based tests can give a positive result two weeks or more after the patient has taken an effective treatment, while pLDH tests generally turn negative a few days after. The use of an RDT positive result in a routine patient care is therefore challenged by the interpretation of whether the result is due to a lasting effect of the already treated infection or to a new infection. The interpretation might also be affected by the level of malaria transmission in the area. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the proportion of positive tests in patients successfully treated for malaria (smear negative) at different time points in time after treatment, for three rapid diagnostic tests: SD Bioline Malaria Antigen P.f. (catalogue number: 05FK50-02-4), CareStart Malaria HRP2 (Pf) (catalogue number: G0141) and CareStart Malaria pLDH (PAN) (catalogue number: G0111). The study will be carried out in two settings with known low and high malaria transmission levels in order to provide guidance of interpretation of a RDT positive result depending on the intensity of malaria transmission. Secondary objectives will be to measure the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria rapid tests compared to smear microscopy, to estimate the median time to become negative for each of the tests and to estimate the proportion of positive tests and the median time to become negative according to the initial parasitaemia and the presence of gametocytes.