Macular Degeneration Clinical Trial
Official title:
Confirmatory, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Groups Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Prostaglandin E1 in Subjects With Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration.
Evaluation of efficacy of alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) for treatment of patients suffering from dry age-related macula degeneration
| Status | Terminated |
| Enrollment | 37 |
| Est. completion date | February 2010 |
| Est. primary completion date | February 2010 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 50 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male and female subjects older than 50 years of age. - Dry age-related macula degeneration (AMD) with hard drusen and possibly beginning geographic atrophy in one eye - Visual acuity between 0.2 and 0.7 (logMAR) assessed with ETDRS charts Exclusion Criteria: - Dry AMD AREDS category 3 or 4 in both eyes - Wet AMD in at least one eye - Detachment of the pigmentary epithelium - Glaucoma - Diabetic retinopathy - Medical history of retinal vein occlusion - Uveitis - Cataract surgery during the study - High myopia (< -6 dpt) with pathological findings of the retina - Medical history of any opthalmic surgery with complications - Medical history of cataract surgery without complications within the last 12 weeks - Medical history of vitrectomy - AREDS medication within the last 2 days - Opthalmologic dietary supplements within the last 2 days - Medical history of retinal hemorrhage - Cardiac failure (NYHA grade II or higher) - Inadequately controlled coronary heart disease or cardiac arrhythmia - Subject has a medical history and/or suspicion of pulmonary edema or pulmonary infiltration - Subject has a peripheral edema - Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment - Subject has renal insufficiency, compensated retention (creatinine > 1,5 mg/dL) - Subject has known existing malignant disease - Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - Subject has a venoocclusive lung disease - Known hepatic disease - Inadequately controlled or untreated hypertension (systolic blood pressure = 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure = 110 mmHg) - Subject has upper grade cardiac valvular disorders - Pregnancy or lactation period - Known hypersensitivity to PGE1 or to any component of the trial medication - Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within the past 2 years - Subject has known lactose intolerance - Poor general state of health or other criteria - Subject has other serious illness - Laboratory values outside the normal range unless considered not clinically relevant by the investigator |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| UCB Pharma |
Germany,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Drug Intervention and Measurements at Baseline (Assessed Within Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart) | Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly. | From baseline to 3 months | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly. | From baseline to time immediately after intervention | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly. | From baseline to 6 months | No |
| Secondary | Progression of the Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration | Severity of the diagnosed dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was assessed in comparison to Baseline and classified as Progression Stabilization Amelioration |
From baseline to 6 months | No |
| Secondary | Development of a Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration | A wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is defined as the development of choroidal neovascularization of the "study-eye" (worse eye). Development is categorized in Yes and No, where Yes means that a subject who had no wet AMD at Screening has developed a wet AMD at Week 29. |
From baseline to 6 months | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability. | From baseline to time immediately after intervention | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability. | From baseline to 3 months | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability. | From baseline to 6 months | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'. | From baseline to time immediately after intervention | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'. | From baseline to 3 months | No |
| Secondary | The Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline | The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'. | From baseline to 6 months | No |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT06262737 -
Single-center Study Measuring OSDI Dry Eye Score in Patients Undergoing an Anti-VEGF Induction Protocol
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02540954 -
Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Aflibercept Regimens in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT00385333 -
Metabolic Mapping to Measure Retinal Metabolism
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT02510794 -
Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Ranibizumab Port Delivery System for Sustained Delivery of Ranibizumab in Patients With Subfoveal Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
|
Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT02228304 -
Study of the Intravitreal Implantation of NT-503-3 Encapsulated Cell Technology (ECT) for the Treatment of Recurrent Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT02390245 -
Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02181504 -
A Study of Abicipar Pegol in Japanese Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT01521065 -
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Clinical and Economic Benefits of I-Ray in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT01204541 -
A Single-Center Pilot Study to Assess Macular Function
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00769392 -
Pilot Study: A Randomized Trial Of Anesthetic Agents For Intravitreal Injection
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00533520 -
Evaluation of Dosing Interval of Higher Doses of Ranibizumab
|
Phase 4 | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT00538538 -
Subretinal Lucentis for Hemorrhagic Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT00536016 -
A Phase 1 Safety Study of Single and Repeated Doses of JSM6427 (Intravitreal Injection) to Treat AMD
|
Phase 1 | |
| Terminated |
NCT00403442 -
Bevacizumab in Combination With Verteporfin Reduced and Standard Fluence in the Treatment of Hemorrhaged Lesions in Neovascular AMD
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT00157976 -
Double-Masked Study of Photrex (Rostaporfin) Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT00211458 -
Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration With Anecortave Acetate
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT00242580 -
A Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing the Combination Treatments of Verteporfin Therapy Plus One of Two Different Doses of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and the Verteporfin Therapy Plus Intravitreal Pegaptanib
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT00239928 -
Clinical Study Of Pegaptanib Sodium (EYE001) For Wet-Type Age-Related Macular Degeneration
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT00095433 -
Extension Study of rhuFab V2 in Subjects With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT00006202 -
Lutein for Age-Related Macular Degeneration
|
Phase 2 |