View clinical trials related to Macular Degeneration.
Filter by:We reviewed the records of 120 consecutive patients (male and female), aged 85 years and above, who underwent pars plana vitrecromy in the Tel Aviv Medical Center during the years 01/01/2006 - 31/12/2013, and were followed by physicians in the ophthalmology department in the center until December 2015.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AS101 1% oral solution as compared to placebo in patients with neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). AMD Patients who underwent 3 consecutive intravitreal anti VEGF injections and have sub retinal or intraretinal fluid at day 1 of study will be treated orally by AS101 1% solution or placebo once daily for 24 weeks and will be tested for sub retinal or intraretinal fluid every 4 weeks by OCT examination. In case of fluid in macula anti intravitreal anti VEGF injections will be given the same day as needed (PRN). Safety evaluation will be assessed by adverse events related to treatment of 1% AS101 oral solution or placebo. Efficacy will be evaluated in terms of duration of fluid free macula in the AS101 treated group as as compared to placebo treated group;
This study is an open-label investigation of the safety and preliminary efficacy of the subretinal transplantation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells on Macular Degeneration.
This pathology, DMLA, whose evolution is chronic, requires regular follow-up and care (IVTs) over a long period (several months or even years). Increasing the number of patients to be followed and treated poses increasing problems for ophthalmologists to ensure regular follow-up of patients, followed by a need for satisfactory functional results. Moreover, this regular follow-up imposes enormous constraints on patients and their families (some children or patients are still working). Studies are beginning to emerge on the reliability of patient follow-up in telemedicine. The use of a measure of visual acuity by patients, Electronic Tablet (TE) or computer (O), and at home, seems a logical step to help us improve the quality of patient follow-up while spacing controls. The aim of our study is thus to demonstrate that the measurement of the VA performed by TE or O is reliable. Indeed, during the follow-up of the patients, in the case where the patient's AV decreases, and whatever the reason
To assess the safety and efficacy of repeated intravitreal injections of DE-122 (low dose and high dose) given in combination with Lucentis® in subjects with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) compared with Lucentis® alone.
COSMOS-Eye is an ancillary study of the COcoa-Supplement and Multivitamins Outcomes Study (COSMOS; NCT02422745). COSMOS is a randomized clinical trial of cocoa extract supplement (containing a total of 500 mg/d flavanols, including 80 mg (-)-epicatechins), and a standard multivitamin supplement to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer among men aged 60 years and older and women aged 65 years and older. This ancillary study is being conducted among participants in COSMOS and will examine whether the cocoa extract supplement or the multivitamin supplement reduces the risk of cataract and AMD, two leading causes of visual impairment in US men and women.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an eye disease which causes people to lose their sharp central vision over time. Aging damages the macula, which is in the middle of the retina - the light-sensitive part at the back of the eye. There are 2 types of AMD - wet AMD and dry AMD. The advanced stage of dry AMD causes vision loss. This is known as geographic atrophy. AMD makes everyday tasks like reading or driving difficult. ASP7317 is a potential new treatment for people with AMD. ASP7317 are human stem cells which have changed into cells found in the retina. ASP7317 is injected under the macula. It is hoped that ASP7317 will replace some of the damaged cells in the macula and improve vision for people with dry AMD. Before ASP7317 is available as a treatment, the researchers need to check its safety and how well it is tolerated. They will also check for signs of improved vision. People taking part in this study will be older people who have geographic atrophy caused by dry AMD. This is an open-label study. This means that people in this study and clinic staff will know that people will receive ASP7317. There will be 3 doses of ASP7317. These are low, medium and high numbers of cells. ASP7317 will be injected under the macula after the person is given either a local or a general anesthetic. To prevent the body from rejecting the cells, people will take tablets of tacrolimus a few days before receiving ASP7317 for up to a few weeks afterwards. Other medicines will be taken during this time to stop infections. There will be 2 groups in the study. Group 1 will be people with severe vision loss and Group 2 will be people with moderate vision loss. There will be different small groups of people within Group 1 and Group 2, with each small group receiving 1 of the 3 doses of ASP7317. Different small groups of people within Group 1 and Group 2 will receive lower to higher doses of ASP7317. Each small group will only receive 1 dose. Group 1 will start treatment first. At each dose, a medical expert panel will check the results of the first person in the group to decide if the rest of the group will receive the same dose. Then, the panel will decide if more people may receive the same dose or if the next group may receive the next highest dose. The panel will use the results from the lower dose of Group 1 to decide when Group 2 starts treatment (also at the lower dose). The panel will also use the results of the middle and higher doses in Group 1 to decide when and how many people in Group 2 can receive these doses. During the study, people will visit the clinic several times for up to 12 months (1 year). During all visits, the study doctors will check for any medical problems after receiving ASP7317. Vital signs will be checked a few days before treatment with ASP7317 and up to about a month afterwards. Vital signs include blood pressure, pulse, and temperature. At some visits, the study doctors will also take blood samples for blood tests. At most visits, people will have eye tests and have different images, scans, and measurements taken. This could be for the affected eye or both eyes, depending on the test. People can visit the clinic extra times, if needed.
The prognosis of exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) accompanied by submacular hemorrhage is generally poor. A recently developed anti-VEGF agent eyeliaTM is also a useful treatment option for exudative AMD. However, one major limitation of VIEW study was that lack of data regarding eyes with submacular hemorrhage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of Eylea in submacular hemorrhage secondary to exudative AMD.
Previous work collectively suggests that rod-mediated dark adaptation (RMDA) is a promising candidate as a functional endpoint measure for evaluating interventions to slow early progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, there is no agreement among the clinical, research and regulatory communities as to what constitutes a clinically (practically) significant slowing in RMDA. Treatments for AMD are often not considered efficacious if they do not result in a criterion level of improvement in vision. But how much change in the rate of dark adaptation constitutes a clinically significant change? Until this issue is resolved, progress in developing clinical trials on early AMD are at a standstill since there is no functional endpoint to be used in the trial. One approach to establishing clinical significance is to examine how RMDA relates to the performance of an everyday visual task under low luminance conditions, such as night driving or reading. However, such data are not yet available. The purpose of this project is to examine the relationship between RMDA and night-time driving and reading under poor illumination. This information will guide the development of a definition of a clinically significant difference in RMDA that can be used in designing clinical trials on early AMD.
This is a randomised, double-masked, parallel group, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of SB11 compared to Lucentis® in subjects with neovascular AMD.