View clinical trials related to Macular Degeneration.
Filter by:This study is being conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of the VIS, LLC (VIS) Opti-K Low Vision Aid Device and treatment to provide vision improvement to patients with age-related macular degeneration.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LX102 gene therapy for nAMD.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the overall safety and efficacy of LX102 gene therapy for nAMD.
Multicenter, randomized, masked, controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of intravitreally administered ONS-5010.
This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. Data were analyzed from the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) registry from October 8, 2019, through November 26, 2021, with a follow-up period of 12 months following the first brolucizumab injection (index date).
In neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), the macula, or the part of the eye that provides the clear, detailed central vision, is being affected by abnormal blood vessel growth and leakage. This leakage affects the vision over time and can lead to severe blurriness or blinding. EXG102-031 was made to block the extra vessel formation which would lead to less leakage affecting the vision. Before EXG102-031 can be tested for its efficacy (if it makes vision better), it must be tested to see if it is safely tolerated to confirm it can continue to be studied in more patients with wAMD.
This study involves user acceptability and feedback of KalEYEdoscope, a digital, handheld device utilizing shape-discrimination hyperacuity to distinguish the severity of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
This retrospective study included nAMD patients whose eyes were grouped into the following cohorts, with the overall cohort receiving ≥ 1 brolucizumab injection; the 12-month and 18-month brolucizumab (BRO) cohorts, which consisted of nAMD patient eyes who switched from a previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and had ≥3 brolucizumab injections with no other anti-VEGF in the first 12 months (360 days) and 18 months (540 days) of follow-up respectively; and the 12-month and 18-month alternating (ALT) cohorts, which consisted of nAMD patient eyes who switched from a previous anti-VEGF to brolucizumab and had ≥2 brolucizumab injections and ≥1 injection of another anti-VEGF in the first 12 months and 18 months of follow-up, respectively.
This is a open label, multicenter, Phase II study to evaluate the usability of the pre-filled syringe (PFS) of SB11 (ranibizumab biosimilar). Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) followed the Instructions for Use (IFU) to prepare and administer SB11 PFS with intravitreal injection to subjects with nAMD or Macular Oedema Secondary to RVO.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the 1st cause of visual impairment after the age of 50. Its most aggressive form, wet AMD, requires regular intravitreal injections (IVI) spaced 4 to 8 weeks apart usually depending on the treatment regimen and the patient's response. The IVI procedure requires a double disinfection with periocular and conjunctival cutaneous povidone-iodine. Antiseptic agents such as povidone iodine are a highly likely factor in the development of dry eye syndrome. Clinical data have demonstrated the abrasive and toxic effects of their use on the ocular surface, especially with repeated exposure (Saedon H, Nosek J, Phillips J. Ocular surface effects of repeated application of povisoden-iodine in patients receiving frequent intravitreal injections. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. 2017;36(4):343-6.). The IVIS study coordinated by Prof. Dot reported impaired ocular surface and quality of life immediately after IVI. The authors suggest 3 levels of action to improve immediate tolerance: (i) improve the basal status of the ocular surface, (ii) reduce the contact time with povidone-iodine which could be toxic to the ocular surface and (iii) improve immediate post-IVI treatment. (Verrecchia S et al. A prospective multicentre study of intravitreal injections and ocular surface in 219 patients: IVIS study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 18). This study is part of the extension of the IVIS study. IVIs are effective and do not currently present a therapeutic alternative. However, their role in the development or exacerbation of dry eye is still poorly evaluated although millions of IVIs are performed each year worldwide (1.3 million in France in 2019). In addition, discomfort after injection is one of the factors that limit adherence to long-term IVI treatment, some patients fearing this repeated act. We propose in this bicentric, prospective, randomized, parallel group study, to evaluate in this context the impact of the continuous consideration of the risk of dry eye. The expected results are the objective improvement of dry eye indicators, comfort and quality of life of patients, all aimed at optimizing the adherence of our patients to their AMD treatment.