View clinical trials related to Lymphoma.
Filter by:This is a phase 1, multi-center, single-arm, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an autologous T-cell product expressing ACTR in combination with rituximab in subjects with refractory or relapsed CD20+ B-cell lymphoma.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate, etoposide, pegaspargase and dexamethasone (MEDA) chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) in patients with stage IV extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety/tolerability and efficacy of itacitinib in combination with ibrutinib in subjects with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
The purpose of this study is to find out if the combination of buparlisib and ibrutinib will lead to better treatment results in patients with relapsed or refractory Follicular lymphoma, (FL) Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The investigators are using buparlisib and ibrutinib because both drugs seem to block different proteins that allow cancer cells to keep growing. Blocking these proteins may help by making the cancer cells undergo cell death, which will stop uncontrolled tumor growth.
The aim of this clinical trial is to see if the drug called AZD2014 is effective and safe to use to treat patients with relapsed or refractory Diffuse Large BCell Lymphoma (DLBCL). The trial will also be looking at combining the antibody (Rituximab) with the drug AZD2014 in a small number of patients to see if this can be done without increasing the toxicity. 36 patients will be recruited to the trial. 30 will receive AZD2014 alone and the remaining 6 will receive AZD2014 plus rituximab. AZD2014 will be given as a 125mg tablet that is to be taken twice a day for 2 days out of every 7 (i.e. on days 1 and 2 of every week). Rituximab will be given via IV infusion on day 1 of every 28 days (once every 4 weeks) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
This is a pilot study to determine the overall survival rate and toxicities of obinutuzumab given with GDP chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory CD20+ aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients who have CD20+ and progressed R-CHOP therapy will be enrolled into the study. About 30 patients are planned to be enrolled from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. If the enrollment is very slow then additional site may be included. Patients will receive Obinutuzumab +GDP for 3 cycles intravenously. CT scan will be used to evaluate the response rate after cycle 2 and PET-CT will be used after cycle 3. Responders (complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response) should proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients who have progressed after three cycles or less are to have their protocol treatment discontinued, with subsequent treatment at investigator discretion. Patients will be followed up to 24 months from transplant done or last chemo. Mandatory tissue submission and optional tissue and blood submission are required for the correlative component of this study.
This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multiple-dose, clinical similarity study to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of ABP 798 compared with rituximab in subjects with grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL and low tumor burden. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion of either ABP 798 or rituximab once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.
Background: The Agricultural Health Study (AHS) studied farmers and their spouses in North Carolina and Iowa. It also included people who worked with pesticides in Iowa. They answered a questionnaire and gave data about their children born since 1975. Researchers want to link this data to public data like birth and death certificates. They want to study how early life exposures to farms are linked to cancer and other bad health outcomes. Objective: To study data to find links between early life farm exposure and negative health outcomes. Eligibility: There will be no human subjects. Design: Researchers will get public data in the two study states. This will come from things like: Birth certificates Driver s licenses Voter registration Death certificates Based on these plus the AHS data, they will create a study group. It will be called Early Life Exposure in Agriculture (ELEA). Researchers will link ELEA data to cancer data. This will identify prevalence of cancer. They will study parents answers on the AHS. The topics include farm practices and pesticide use. They will determine ELEA exposure to pesticides. Researchers will analyze the cancer and pesticide results and look for links.
This is an open label, multicenter, dose escalation, phase Ib study to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), by assessing the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and preliminary efficacy of selinexor in adult patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies receiving either R-DHAOx (Group A) or R-GDP (Group B). This dose escalation phase will be followed by an exploratory expansion phase in the same population with 12 patients enrolled in each group, who will receive selinexor at the RP2D. The "3+3" design will be applied for dose escalation. The escalation will be performed independently in two distinct groups: - Group A : Oral selinexor + R-DHAOx for 3 cycles (3-week cycles) - Group B: Oral selinexor + R-GDP for 3 cycles (3-week cycles) The choice of the conventional immunotherapy regimen which will be administered to each patient, R-DHAOx (Group A) or R-GDP (Group B), is left at the investigator's decision before patient's inclusion. Different dose levels for selinexor administration will be examined sequentially in each group by the Dose Escalation Committee (DEC): 4 doses of selinexor per 3-week cycle at 20 mg flat (Dose Level -1, DL-1), 40 mg flat (DL1), 60 mg flat (DL2) or 80 mg flat (DL3) will be taken orally by the patient on D1, D3, D8 and D10 of each cycle (dosing weeks = week 1 and week 2 of each 3-week cycle). Dose escalation will begin at DL1 and will continue until the MTD is exceeded or until the highest dose level defined in the study (DL3) is reached. Dose escalation to the next planned dose level will be decided by the DEC based on the number of DLTs observed during the DLT assessment period. The dose escalation phase will be followed by an exploratory expansion phase in the same two groups (Groups A and B), depending on the decision of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) after review of safety data at the end of dose escalation part. Patients enrolled in the expansion phase will receive selinexor at the RP2D defined by the IDMC, together with either of the conventional regimen R-DHAOx or R-GDP (left at the investigator's choice).
The purpose of this trial is to explore the clinical utility of two investigational antibodies in patients with advanced cancer or lymphomas. This is a multi-center, open-label Phase I/Ib study. The study consists of two dose escalation parts and two dose expansion parts testing GWN323 as a single agent or GWN323 in combination with PDR001. The dose escalation parts will estimate the MTD and/or RDE and test different dosing schedules. The dose expansion parts of the study will use the MTD/RDE determined in the dose escalation part to assess the activity, safety and tolerability of the investigational products in patients with specific types of cancer and lymphomas. Approximately 264 adult patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas will be enrolled.