View clinical trials related to Lymphoma.
Filter by:Autologous T cells engineered to express an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) with a safety switch will be infused back to patients with B cell malignancies, including lymphoma and leukemia. The patients will be monitored after infusion of anti-CD19 CAR-transduced T cells for adverse events, persistence of anti-CD19 CAR-transduced T cells and treatment efficacy. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and the efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-transduced T cell therapy for patients with B cell malignancies. Eligibility: Patients between 1 and 85 years of age, who have relapsed or refractory CD19-expressing B-cell malignancies (leukemia or lymphoma) that have not responded to standard treatments. Patients with a history of allogeneic stem cell transplant who meet all eligibility criteria are eligible to participate. Patients must have adequate organ functions. Design: - Peripheral blood from patients will be collected for isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which will be transduced with a lentiviral or retroviral vector encoding anti-CD19 CAR containing a CD28 and a CD3 zeta as costimulatory domains as well as a safety switch. - Patients will receive a lymphodepleting preconditioning regimen to prepare their immune system to accept modified T cells. - Patients will receive an infusion of their own modified T cells. They will remain in the hospital to be monitored for adverse events until they have recovered from the treatment. - Patients will have frequent follow-up visits to monitor the persistence of modified T cells and efficacy of the treatment.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of SCT400 versus rituximab (MabThera®) in patients with CD20+ B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of SCT400 versus rituximab (MabThera®), as well as the presence of human anti-chimeric antibodies (HACA).
The standard treatment approach for patients with stage III-IV DLBCL is combination chemotherapy. Receipt of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) after effective chemotherapy was associated with improved in-field control and event-free survival. However, it is uncertain for the radiotherapy field size to treat for these patients after chemotherapy. Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) after effective chemotherapy is a common strategy for patients with stage III-IV DLBCL. There is not a clinical trial to research whether the sequential narrowed radiotherapy field size (involved-site radiotherapy, ISRT) can obtain the same efficacy as IFRT and decrease toxicities related to radiotherapy.
The most common option of radiotherapy for patients with limited-stage DLBCL is involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT). The more limited radiotherapy field size changing from IFRT to reasonable margin from gross tumor has been reported to maintain the high rates of local disease control, while minimizing the risks of radiation-induced toxicities. However, the research didn't analyze whether the efficacy of consolidation involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) be affected by the response of chemotherapy. The biologic definition of clinical target volume (CTV) of ISRT and actual radiotherapy field size need to be ascertained.
Radiotherapy (RT) is an important option for patients with limited stage FL. The recommended approach for patients with limited stage FL by The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) is 24Gy~30Gy consolidation RT following effective systemic therapy. There is no universal consensus for a ''standard'' RT field size in the treatment of limited stage FL. The involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) has been treated effectively for these patients. However, the certain target volumes of ISRT need to be defined for patients with limited stage FL after effective chemotherapy.
This study is a Randomized Phase II Study to Compare Efficacy of CHOP versus Fractionated ICED in Transplant-eligible Patients with Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether 18F-Al labeled RGD is safety and effective for cancer diagnosis and therapy response.
Many trials that patients with advanced or recurrent indolent lymphoma managed with very low-dose (4Gy) limited-field RT (LD-IFRT) have shown that high response rates and durable remission can be achieved. However, the results of two phase III trials have failed to demonstrate the lasting response rate (RR) with LD-IFRT versus in other approaches. Histology, bulky tumor (>5 cm), higher number of prior chemotherapy regimens, adoption of rituximab, and age＞65 years have been shown to significantly influence response rates of LD-IFRT. The objectives of this trial investigate the efficacy of palliative low-dose involved-field radiation therapy in patients lower than 65 years of age with recurrent advanced follicular lymphoma.
The purpose of this study is to find out what effects new combinations of treatment will have this disease. New promising treatment strategies will be added to this study as they are available to be compared against the standard treatment.
Open-labeled, multicenter, phase I/II study of imatinib combined with ESHAP as salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma