View clinical trials related to Lung Neoplasms.
Filter by:This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled research study aims to objectively evaluate the role of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), which combines the theory of acupuncture with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy, for the treatment of pain in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer.
Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RTS) segmentectomy is safe and effective for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In RTS-segmentectomy, dissection and sealing procedures are performed by either staplers or energy devices. Staplers, the current standard of care, have been associated with higher operating costs compared to energy devices for open lobectomy, RTS lobectomy and minimally invasive segmentectomy. However, there is a lack of prospective research evaluating the costs of the two methods for lung dissection and vessel sealing in RTS-segmentectomy. This prospective trial seeks to determine whether it is feasible to conduct a randomized controlled trial evaluating the costs of the Signia stapler versus Vessel Sealer Extend energy device in RTS-segmentectomy for NSCLC. If this trial is feasible, we will be able to conduct a full-scale trial to compare costs and health outcomes, providing an economic evaluation that will inform hospital decision makers and clinicians in Canada.
The reliable predictive markers to identify which patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer tumors will achieve durable clinical benefit for chemo-immunotherapy are needed. This study is a real world study, aiming to establish a multi-parameter model to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) combined with chemotherapy, and to explore the correlation and predictive value of each single biomarker, so as to assist physician to select patients who may benefit for a long time as early as possible and guide clinical accurate treatment.
Randomized phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial.
This is a single arm screening study. All eligible participants will be subjected to low dose CT (LDCT) screening and biomarker testing. The primary aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of conducting LDCT screening in at-risk populations for lung cancer in Singapore: - For the smoker population, LDCT screening for lung cancer will be implemented in accordance to Academy of Medicine, Singapore screening test guidelines with the aim of investigating the feasibility of instituting lung cancer screening clinical service in Singapore. - For the non-smoker population, LDCT screening for lung cancer will be introduced to systematically collect baseline data to better understand and provide evidence for lung adenocarcinoma in never-smoker phenotype that is unique to East Asia/Singapore. This will help address unmet needs in local population research as reported by Academy of Medicine, Singapore, to validate risk factors and inform future screening guidelines for the at-risk population. Screening results will be reported based on Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS).
This study explores whether supportive care interventions that might reduce rehospitalization could be implemented and feasible, in subjects within a high-risk group of subjects with newly diagnosed hospitalized advanced lung cancer (ALC). This study screened 50 subjects from health records and consented to 15 of these screened subjects. These 15 subjects responded to PRO questionnaires.
This study is to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of SC MK-3475A vs intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab, administered with chemotherapy in first line treatment of adult participants with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The primary hypotheses of this study are MK-3475A subcutaneous (SC) is noninferior to pembrolizumab IV with respect to PK parameters.
The main aim of this study is to learn about the time between the start and stop of treatment with brigatinib in Chinese participants with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who have been positively diagnosed with having the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. Other study aims are to learn about the progression of NSCLC and participants' response to treatment with brigatinib.
The primary objective is to evaluate Progression Free Survival (PFS) of the group (160 mg group) in which dose reduction was performed for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib. The Secondary objectives of this study are as follows. 1. To evaluate Progression-free survival (PFS) of the group maintaining the same dose (240mg group) and the group in which dose reduction was performed (160mg group) for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib 2. In the group maintaining the same dose (240mg group) and the group in which dose reduction was performed (160mg group) for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib, Time-to-Treatment Discontinuation(TTD), Objective Response Rate(ORR), Disease Control Rate(DCR), Tumor shrinkage and Overall Survival(OS) is evaluated. 3. In the group maintaining the same dose (240mg group) and the group in which dose reduction was performed (160mg group) for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib, specific reasons (adverse event name, grade, etc.) according to Lazertinib dose adjustment is evaluated. 4. To evaluate the treatment profile of Lazertinib including duration of treatment, dose adjustment, and reason for discontinuation of treatment. 5. To evaluate the safety of Lazertinib in the 240 mg and 160 mg groups
This is a Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱa, multi-center, open-label study, aiming to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and efficacy of BR790 in combination with anlotinib in adult participants with advanced NSCLC.