View clinical trials related to Lung Neoplasms.
Filter by:The purpose of the Phase 1b part of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ASP2215 in combination with erlotinib and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ASP2215. The purpose of the Phase 2 part of the study was to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) of the RP2D of ASP2215 in combination with erlotinib.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Apatinib combined with cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) vs Apatinib alone as the third line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR
This trial investigates the impact of lung cancer treatment on physical status, symptoms and quality of life. Furthermore this trial investigates possible underlying causes and consequences of deconditioning.
To evaluate the increase in Overall Response Rate (ORR) in the pembrolizumab alone arm compared to the pembrolizumab after SBRT arm at 12 weeks
The investigators propose to conduct a pilot feasibility study of single agent afatinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutant adenocarcinoma of the lung (NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer) with the sole purpose of characterizing the genomic landscape before afatinib and at the time of disease progression.
The purpose of the study is to compare the intratumoral biodistribution of FAZA and F-miso in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and correlate the results of PET scans with immunohistochemistry.
EBUS elastography is a method to determine stiffness of lymph nodes, based on the minute deformation of the node by the beating heart. Whether EBUS elastography may further increase the sensitivity to predict the presence or absence of malignancy is unclear. We suggest to use EBUS elastography strain pattern analysis for this assessment and correlate these measurements with the final pathology outcome to determine NPV, PPV, sensitivity and specificity of this analysis to predict the presence or absence of malignancy in patients with (suspected) lung cancer in a prospectively obtained observational cohort study.
Rationale: An anatomical surgical resection is considered to be the standard of care in fit patients who present with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, surgery is less frequently performed in both elderly patients (aged ≥75 years), who represent the fastest-growing group of patients with stage I/II NSCLC, and in patients who have significant co-morbidity. Following the introduction of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), an outpatient treatment that is typically delivered in between 3-8 fractions, the median survival of all elderly patients undergoing radiotherapy in The Netherlands increased by 9.3 months. Randomized trials comparing SABR and surgery have yet to be completed and results of the ongoing ACOSOG Z4032 studies will not be available in the within 5 years. A recent data retrospective study comparing both modalities has raised interesting questions about the impact of local therapy on recurrence patterns. It was found that a better loco-regional disease control rate was achieved with SABR. Objective: To study the effect of surgery and SABR on both immunostimulatory (with primary endpoint CD8 positive cells) and immunosuppressive cells in peripheral blood in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who are treated with either modality. Study population: 40 patients with cT1-2aN0M0 either cytologically or histologically proven NSCLC. Main study parameters/endpoints: To determine whether an increase in CD8 activity can be established after SABR in patients with early stage lung cancer and to compare this increase with that in patients undergoing a surgical intervention. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Only risks in participation are the risks with drawing blood. Subjects will not have any benefits. This pilot study will be used to generate information concerning both treatments useful for the decision to plan a future study in a larger series of patients.
This study aims to compare the efficacy of afatinib maintenance with pemetrexed maintenance following induction therapy with platinum/ pemetrexed in patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after first-line treatment with afatinib with respect to progression-free survival.
This is a Phase III, global, multicenter, open-label, randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of 16 cycles (1 cycle duration=21 days) of atezolizumab (MPDL3280A) treatment compared with best supportive care (BSC) in participants with Stage IB-Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, as measured by disease-free survival (DFS) as assessed by the investigator and overall survival (OS). Participants, after completing up to 4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive atezolizumab for 16 cycles or BSC.