View clinical trials related to Lung Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is a multicenter，randomized, open label, active-controlled, parallel-group study comparing efficacy and safety of LY01610(Irinotecan hydrochloride liposome Injection) and Topotecan in Patients with Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy oral nutrition supplement (ONS) in malnutrition/high risk malnutrition cancer patients. The main questions it aims to answer: 1. Are there differences in knowledge, attitude and behaviour scores in cancer patients who receive cancer-specific ONS compared to those who do not receive cancer-specific ONS? 2. Is there a difference in nutritional status as assessed by average body weight, body mass index (BMI), haemoglobin (Hb), and albumin levels in cancer patients who receive cancer-specific ONS compared to those who do not receive cancer-specific ONS?
This study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK profiles of RMC-6291 and RMC-6236 in adults with KRAS G12C-mutated solid tumors.
An open, non-randomized, multicenter, single-arm dose-escalation design, phase 1 trial to study the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of JYP0322 in patients with ROS1+ locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors .
This is an open label, Phase 1, dose escalation trial evaluating the safety of oncolytic adenovirus TILT-123 in combination with Pembrolizumab in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor refractory non-small cell lung cancer.
To observe the efficacy and safety of adebelizumab combined with chemotherapy and sequential adebelizumab combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed extensive small cell lung cancer.
This is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter Phase 3 clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of envafolimab plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy versus placebo plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in subjects with resectable stage IIIA and IIIB (N2) NSCLC. Primary study endpoints are MPR rate assessed by BIPR and EFS assessed by BIRC.
The PROACT LUNG study is a prospective multi-center observational study to validate a blood-based test for the early detection of lung cancer by collecting blood samples from high-risk participants who will undergo a routine, standard-of-care screening Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT).
This clinical trial compares the use of a shared decision-making communication tool during a clinical encounter to standard care for improving the quality of the shared decision-making process among patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung cancer patients are faced with many decisions about their treatment options. Studies have found that patients are most satisfied if they perceive an effort by their physician to share decision making and are afforded sufficient time to make their decision. Shared decision-making tools can help physicians guide the conversation, offer tailored estimates of the potential benefits, harms, and practical inconveniences of the available options, and support deliberations that take into account patient biological and biographical circumstances, goals, and priorities. Incorporating a shared decision-making communication tool into standard clinical encounters may improve the shared-decision making process as well as patient satisfaction with their treatment choice.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of tarlatamab with placebo as assessed by progression free survival (PFS).