Lung Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparing the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Bupivacaine Liposome Serrate Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) Versus Traditional Thoracic Paravertebral Block (TPVB): A Randomized, Double-blinded Non-inferiority Clinical Trial
Verified date | March 2024 |
Source | Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
In this study, patients will receive bupivacaine liposome serratus anterior plane block or ropivacaine paraspinal block to manage postoperative pain. Follow-up visits will be conducted to investigate the patient's postoperative pain and recovery quality. The investigators hypothesize that the simple and safe serratus anterior plane block with a novel long-acting local anesthetic (bupivacaine liposome) has analgesic efficacy and recovery quality that is not inferior to the currently commonly used bupivacaine paraspinal block.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 168 |
Est. completion date | January 31, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | January 28, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Elective unilateral thoracoscopic lung surgery. - Age between 18 and 75 years old. - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I to III. Exclusion Criteria: - Contraindications to nerve block: puncture site infection, local anesthetic allergy, coagulation disorders or risk of bleeding. - Hepatic or renal dysfunction. - Pregnant, breastfeeding, possibility of pregnancy or planned pregnancy. - Use of analgesic drugs before surgery or history of chronic pain or opioid abuse. - Patients who refuse to participate. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Shiyou Wei |
China,
Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/anae.12344. Epub 2013 Aug 7. — View Citation
Chong M, Berbenetz N, Kumar K, Lin C. The serratus plane block for postoperative analgesia in breast and thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Oct 23:rapm-2019-100982. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100982. Online ahead of print. — View Citation
Ding W, Chen Y, Li D, Wang L, Liu H, Wang H, Zeng X. Investigation of single-dose thoracic paravertebral analgesia for postoperative pain control after thoracoscopic lobectomy - A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2018 Sep;57:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.i — View Citation
Hu D, Onel E, Singla N, Kramer WG, Hadzic A. Pharmacokinetic profile of liposome bupivacaine injection following a single administration at the surgical site. Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Feb;33(2):109-15. doi: 10.1007/s40261-012-0043-z. — View Citation
Ilfeld BM. Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Update of the Published Evidence and Comparison With Novel, Alternative Analgesic Modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):308-335. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001581. — View Citation
Krediet AC, Moayeri N, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, Renes S, Bigeleisen PE, Groen GJ. Different Approaches to Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block: An Illustrated Review. Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):459-74. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000747. — View Citation
Rice D, Heil JW, Biernat L. Pharmacokinetic Profile and Tolerability of Liposomal Bupivacaine Following a Repeated Dose via Local Subcutaneous Infiltration in Healthy Volunteers. Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Mar;37(3):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0495-2. — View Citation
Sandeep B, Huang X, Li Y, Xiong D, Zhu B, Xiao Z. A comparison of regional anesthesia techniques in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery: A network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106840. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106840. Epub 2022 Aug 24. — View Citation
Yeung JH, Gates S, Naidu BV, Wilson MJ, Gao Smith F. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 21;2(2):CD009121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009121.pub2. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | The number of patients receiving rescue analgesia. | The number of patients receiving rescue analgesia. | 24 to 72 hours after the surgery | |
Other | Number of patients with nausea and vomiting | Number of patients who experienced nausea and vomiting after surgery. | 24 to 72 hours after the surgery | |
Primary | Postoperative NRS pain score at 24 hours | Postoperative numeric rating scales pain score at 24 hours after the surgery. Postoperative pain severity at rest and movement measured using a numerical rating scale(NRS) at 24 h. The numerical rating scale (NRS) is a line with numbers from 0 to 10 are spaced evenly across the page. And the NRS is bounded at the left-most end with "no pain" and at the right-most end with "worst pain imaginable". Pain levels below "4" are considered mild, "4-7" is moderate pain, and anything above "7" is considered severe pain. Patients are instructed to circle the number that represents the amount of pain that they are experiencing at the time of the evaluation. The movement status refers to maximum mobility of the upper arm of the surgical side. Remedial pain relief measures are initiated when the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score exceeds 4. | 24 hours after the surgery | |
Secondary | Postoperative QoR-15 | The 15-item quality of recovery(QoR-15) after the surgery. The QoR-15 scale is a global measurement of postoperative recovery, consisting of 15 items with 10 points each, with a total score ranging from 0 (QoR very poor) to 150 (QoR very good). | 24 to 72 hours after the surgery | |
Secondary | Cumulative opioid consumption after surgery | Cumulative opioid consumption after surgery | 72 hours after the surgery | |
Secondary | AUC of postoperative pain score | Area under the curve(AUC) of pain score 72 hours after surgery | 72 hours after the surgery | |
Secondary | Postoperative NRS pain score | Pain scores at other time points except for the primary outcome. Postoperative pain severity at rest and movement measured using a numerical rating scale(NRS) at 24 h. The numerical rating scale (NRS) is a line with numbers from 0 to 10 are spaced evenly across the page. And the NRS is bounded at the left-most end with "no pain" and at the right-most end with "worst pain imaginable". Pain levels below "4" are considered mild, "4-7" is moderate pain, and anything above "7" is considered severe pain. Patients are instructed to circle the number that represents the amount of pain that they are experiencing at the time of the evaluation. The movement status refers to maximum mobility of the upper arm of the surgical side. Remedial pain relief measures are initiated when the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score exceeds 4. | 1h, 6h, 48h, 72h after the surgery, separately. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03918538 -
A Series of Study in Testing Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Interventions in Lung Cancer Survivors
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05078918 -
Comprehensive Care Program for Their Return to Normal Life Among Lung Cancer Survivors
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04548830 -
Safety of Lung Cryobiopsy in People With Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04633850 -
Implementation of Adjuvants in Intercostal Nerve Blockades for Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Cancer Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05583916 -
Same Day Discharge for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Lung Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00341939 -
Retrospective Analysis of a Drug-Metabolizing Genotype in Cancer Patients and Correlation With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Data
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06376253 -
A Phase I Study of [177Lu]Lu-EVS459 in Patients With Ovarian and Lung Cancers
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05898594 -
Lung Cancer Screening in High-risk Black Women
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05060432 -
Study of EOS-448 With Standard of Care and/or Investigational Therapies in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03667716 -
COM701 (an Inhibitor of PVRIG) in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors.
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03575793 -
A Phase I/II Study of Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Plinabulin in Patients With Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT01624090 -
Mithramycin for Lung, Esophagus, and Other Chest Cancers
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03275688 -
NanoSpectrometer Biomarker Discovery and Confirmation Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04931420 -
Study Comparing Standard of Care Chemotherapy With/ Without Sequential Cytoreductive Surgery for Patients With Metastatic Foregut Cancer and Undetectable Circulating Tumor-Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid Levels
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06010862 -
Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06052449 -
Assessing Social Determinants of Health to Increase Cancer Screening
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06017271 -
Predictive Value of Epicardial Adipose Tissue for Pulmonary Embolism and Death in Patients With Lung Cancer
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05787522 -
Efficacy and Safety of AI-assisted Radiotherapy Contouring Software for Thoracic Organs at Risk
|