Evaluation of the Synergistic Impact of Needle and Forceps Biopsy With Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy

Lung Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparison and Synergistic Evaluation of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy for Diagnosis of Lung Lesions With Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05110131
• Other study ID #: CONFIDENT_ENB
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: November 13, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: June 2024
• Source: Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This randomized crossover study aimed to evaluate whether a multimodal biopsy strategy using both needle and forceps can provide additive benefits compared with a single device for diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions with electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy under moderate sedation and assess the comparative yield and discordance between the two devices.

Description:

This randomized crossover study aimed to evaluate whether combining electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy provides synergistic benefits, and compare the diagnostic performance of needle aspiration biopsy and forceps biopsy for diagnosis of pulmonary lesions.

The investigators designed this study to prospectively enroll patients with lung lesions that warrant histologic diagnosis and are feasible for undergoing electromagnetic bronchoscopy under moderate sedation. Participants will be randomized to two groups. One group will receive an ENB-guided biopsy with lung lesion with needle aspiration followed by forceps biopsy (needle-first group), while the other groups will receive the same procedure with forceps biopsy followed by needle aspiration biopsy (forceps-first group). All participants will undergo ENB under moderate sedation without the concurrent use of other guiding techniques such as fluoroscopy and radial endobronchial sonography. All participants will be followed up for up to 12 months to confirm the final diagnosis.

The primary endpoint is the diagnostic accuracy of combined needle aspiration and forceps biopsy for diagnosing pulmonary lesions compared with forceps biopsy alone. Diagnostic accuracy was defined as the proportion of participants in whom the biopsy yielded a definitive diagnosis, consistent with the strict definition; a biopsy procedure was considered diagnostic if the specimen established a definitive malignancy (true positive) or a specific benign diagnosis that sufficiently represented the lesion and informed further management (true negative) without the change in diagnosis through 12 months of follow-up.

Secondary endpoints include diagnostic accuracy of the combination compared with needle aspiration alone, sensitivity for malignancy, and the strictly defined diagnostic yield determined solely based on the ENB procedural encounter, successful lesion approach, sampling duration, number of attempts for needle and forceps biopsy, and adverse events related to the ENB procedure.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 142
• Est. completion date: November 13, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: November 13, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with lung lesions with a possibility of malignancy and need tissue confirmation, which is eligible for ENB procedure under moderate sedation

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who disagree to participate

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Disease
• Lung Cancer
• Lung Cancer (Diagnosis)
• Lung Neoplasms
• Neoplasms

Intervention

Device:
• Device for performing biopsy via electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy
Device for performing biopsy via electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (needle and forceps)

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Korea, Republic of	Seoul National University Bundang Hospital	Seongnam-si	Gyeonggi-do

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

References & Publications (6)

Folch EE, Labarca G, Ospina-Delgado D, Kheir F, Majid A, Khandhar SJ, Mehta HJ, Jantz MA, Fernandez-Bussy S. Sensitivity and Safety of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1753-1769. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.534. Epub 2020 May 23. — View Citation

Folch EE, Pritchett MA, Nead MA, Bowling MR, Murgu SD, Krimsky WS, Murillo BA, LeMense GP, Minnich DJ, Bansal S, Ellis BQ, Mahajan AK, Gildea TR, Bechara RI, Sztejman E, Flandes J, Rickman OB, Benzaquen S, Hogarth DK, Linden PA, Wahidi MM, Mattingley JS, Hood KL, Lin H, Wolvers JJ, Khandhar SJ; NAVIGATE Study Investigators. Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: One-Year Results of the Prospective, Multicenter NAVIGATE Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Mar;14(3):445-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 23. — View Citation

Gildea TR, Folch EE, Khandhar SJ, Pritchett MA, LeMense GP, Linden PA, Arenberg DA, Rickman OB, Mahajan AK, Singh J, Cicenia J, Mehta AC, Lin H, Mattingley JS; NAVIGATE Study Investigators. The Impact of Biopsy Tool Choice and Rapid On-Site Evaluation on Diagnostic Accuracy for Malignant Lesions in the Prospective: Multicenter NAVIGATE Study. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2021 Jul 1;28(3):174-183. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000740. — View Citation

Mondoni M, Sotgiu G, Bonifazi M, Dore S, Parazzini EM, Carlucci P, Gasparini S, Centanni S. Transbronchial needle aspiration in peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2016 Jul;48(1):196-204. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00051-2016. Epub 2016 May 12. — View Citation

Ost DE, Ernst A, Lei X, Kovitz KL, Benzaquen S, Diaz-Mendoza J, Greenhill S, Toth J, Feller-Kopman D, Puchalski J, Baram D, Karunakara R, Jimenez CA, Filner JJ, Morice RC, Eapen GA, Michaud GC, Estrada-Y-Martin RM, Rafeq S, Grosu HB, Ray C, Gilbert CR, Yarmus LB, Simoff M; AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. Diagnostic Yield and Complications of Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Lung Lesions. Results of the AQuIRE Registry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 1;193(1):68-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1332OC. — View Citation

Vachani A, Maldonado F, Laxmanan B, Kalsekar I, Murgu S. The Impact of Alternative Approaches to Diagnostic Yield Calculation in Studies of Bronchoscopy. Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1426-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.074. Epub 2021 Sep 7. No abstract available. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Conservative diagnostic accuracy at 12 months	([True positive + True negative]/All biopsied performed)	Confirmed by follow-up results at 12 months
Secondary	Sensitivity of needle or forceps biopsy for diagnosis of malignancy	True positive/Confirmed malignancy cases	Confirmed by follow-up results at 12 months
Secondary	Diagnostic yield at index procedure	The proportion of pathologic results that leads to a specific malignant or benign diagnosis	At index procedure
Secondary	Duration of procedure	Total duration and time per sampling for needle and forceps biopsy	At index procedure