Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04612946 |
Other study ID # |
844390 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 10, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2022 |
Source |
University of Pennsylvania |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study will consist of two primary aims designed to help advance quality and utilization
of lung cancer screening (LCS) within an academic and community-based medical system. The
objective of Aim 1 is to pilot test the effect and feasibility of using direct outreach and
telemedicine to increase LCS counseling and LDCT uptake among screening-eligible patients.
Patients who confirm eligibility and agree to participate will be randomized into two study
arms: 1) usual care or 2) telemedicine LCS counseling referral. For Aim 2, each arm will
first complete a baseline survey to explore how individual beliefs and knowledge impact
screening intention and uptake. Patients in both arms will also receive brief information on
lung cancer screening guidelines and be asked to report LCS-related preferences after
exposure to the information. All interventions will be administered using a secure, web-based
platform.
Description:
In 2013, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) provided a Grade "B"
recommendation for annual lung cancer screening (LCS) for asymptomatic adults aged 55-80 who
are or have been heavy smokers (≥30 pack-years of smoking and quit-date < 15 years ago), and
are able to undergo surgery. In 2015, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
issued national coverage for LCS requiring that LCS counseling, which must include shared
decision-making and tobacco cessation counseling, occur prior to LCS. CMS also provides
reimbursement for LCS counseling to further support providers to engage in meaningful,
collaborative conversations about LCS with patients. Despite widespread support, uptake and
implementation of LCS across the United States has been low (estimated 3-5%
screening-eligible population screened). Locally, since the onset of the Penn Medicine LCS
Program in 2014, over 3,500 individual patients have received LCS; however, documentation and
reimbursement of LCS counseling are limited.
Challenges of implementing LCS include substantial barriers to identifying screening-eligible
patients, supporting high-quality decision-making, and remaining uncertainties regarding
risks and benefits. For other types of cancer screening, insights from behavioral science
have been applied to understand how cognitive biases and beliefs impact screening uptake. Yet
for LCS, there is limited evidence on how these beliefs may affect screening behaviors in
routine practice. Given the complexities of LCS, in which the benefits do not clearly
outweigh the harms, understanding how these biases impact screening can help inform
development of intervention strategies that both support informed decision-making and
increase uptake among eligible patients. Leveraging an existing EMR-based data warehouse,
this study will combine insights from behavioral economics and connected health strategies to
pilot test connected health approaches including direct patient outreach and telemedicine
visits to improve LCS counseling, and to explore individual-level moderators of LCS screening
intention and uptake. The long-term goal is to decrease lung cancer burden by increasing
utilization of LCS and providing clinicians and patients with effective strategies to deliver
high-quality, patient-centered care. This study will also advance scientific understanding of
the mechanisms that drive or hinder health behavior in the context of cancer prevention.