CT‐Controlled Advanced Navigation Techniques for Transbronchial Pulmonary Lesion Access; Evaluation of Electromagnetic Navigation Based Diagnostic Yield

Lung Cancer Clinical Trial

— CONTROL-E  

Official title:

CT‐Controlled Advanced Navigation Techniques for Transbronchial Pulmonary Lesion Access; Evaluation of Electromagnetic Navigation Based Diagnostic Yield

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03355586
• Other study ID #: NL63110.091.17
• Status: Completed
• Start date: December 21, 2017
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: April 2018
• Source: Radboud University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

In this clinical trial we will investigate the diagnostic yield of a combination of commercially available imaging and navigation techniques for reaching peripheral lung lesions. The two investigated techniques will herein be the rEBUS imaging modality combined with electromagnetic based navigation. Confirmation of reaching the lung lesion will be by means of CT (fluoroscopic) imaging. Rapid On‐Site Evaluation (ROSE) of cytopathology will be used for obtaining a per‐procedural outcome on tissue biopsy representativeness. All data will be prospectively collected. In case tissue biopsy is found to be malignant or benign, it will be termed representative. In case tissue biopsy is found to be non‐representative (=blood, anatomical lung tissue, unreachable), conventional followup of CT guided TTNA, follow‐up monitoring and/or surgical biopsy will serve as golden standard for obtaining tissue diagnosis. For verification of reaching the target lesion, another study parameter of interest, (cb)CT imaging will be performed for verification that instruments are within the nodule (per‐procedurally available).

Description:

Lung cancer is one of the leading most frequent types of cancer and is the most lethal malignancy in the Netherlands. Mortality is high due to its advanced stage disease at diagnosis. To improve survival current guidelines are moving towards CT-screening of the high risk population. These CT-scans detect numerous nodules and rapidly increase the demand for minimal invasive accurate and safe diagnostic procedures.

The historically available and current first diagnostic procedure in the work-up of PPLs is fluoroscopy guided Trans Bronchial Biopsy (TBB) despite its low pooled yield of 31.1%. When the above transbronchial technique does not provide an unambiguous outcome, an additional and more invasive diagnostic work-up remains indicated. To exclude the possibility of missing malignancies, trans thoracic needle aspiration is first indicated. If deemed inaccessible, surgical biopsy may be alternatively indicated depending on patient risk of malignancy. Ideally, a transbronchial approach having high diagnostic accuracy would overcome the need of this sequential increasingly invasive diagnostic and consecutive treatment approach. Newer pilot studies now hypothesize that combining multiple new endobronchial modalities might provide a solution in preventing more invasive additional diagnostic staging, reporting diagnostic yields exceeding 70%. When an accurate and certain transbronchial diagnosis by combining multiple techniques can indeed be provided. We will study a combination of new advanced modalities for diagnosis of peripheral nodules endobronchially. The aim of this study is to determine diagnostic yield, cost-effectiveness, safety, and, to collect data for developing diagnostic algorithms to further cost-effectively increase yield, reduce complication rate and determine a future platform for clinical implementation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: January 1, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

• ASA physical status 1-3.

• Age 18 years or older.

• A pulmonary lesion (i.e. a focal, rounded opacity mostly surrounded by aerated lung or a ground glass opacity or part- or sub-solid lesion) with an indication for diagnostic evaluation following current clinical guidelines and/or as decided by multi-disciplinary team consultation.

Exclusion Criteria:

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

• Bleeding disorders.

• Less than 18 years old.

• Contra-indication for temporary interruption of the use of anticoagulant therapy (acenocoumarol, warfarin, therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparines, clopidrogel, analogs, or, NOAC's).

• Known allergy for lidocaine.

• Uncontrolled pulmonary hypertension.

• Recent and/or uncontrolled cardiac disease.

• Compromised upper airway (e.g. concomitant head and neck cancer or central airway stenosis for any reason such that endobronchial access is considered unsafe).

• ASA classification greater than or equal to 4 (unfit for performing non-surgical biopsy).

• Pregnancy.

• Inability to consent.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Lung Cancer

Intervention

Combination Product:
• Electromagnetic navigation
Electromagnetic navigation combined with use of radial EBUS probe and Rapid On Site Evaluation of Histology for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules.Controlled by cone beam CT.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Netherlands	Radboudumc	Nijmegen	Gelderland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Radboud University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	number of patients with an adequate diagnosis (= diagnostic yield)	diagnosis will consist of benign, malign or non-representative (=blood, anatomical lung tissue, unreachable)	0-12 months
Secondary	number of patients with (S)AE's related to the procedure	minor bleeding and pneumothoraces are reported	0-12 months
Secondary	cost-effectiveness	the study procedures will be compared against the conventional diagnostic TBB work-up	0-12 months
Secondary	radiation exposure	compared against conventional TBB and consecutive TTNA procedure	0-12 months