View clinical trials related to Lung Cancer.
Filter by:Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in the Singapore population, being the 2nd most commonly diagnosed cancer amongst males and 3rd most commonly diagnosed cancer amongst females. Pulmonologists, oncologists and thoracic surgeons are often consulted for the evaluation of imaging-identified pulmonary nodules. These may have been identified either incidentally or through screening. The majority of these are indeterminate and definitive investigation with biopsy or resection is invasive and not without risk. Hence, current consensus guidelines adopt a largely expectant strategy in the management of these indeterminate pulmonary nodules. There is substantial evidence that lung cancer in Asians may be unique with multiple driver mutations, lower age of presentation and may be independent of tobacco exposure. In addition, there are guidelines that recommend that the management of lung nodules in Asia should account for these differences. However, the evidence for alternative recommendations is lacking. The aim of the study will be to identify radiological and clinical predictors that can improve the diagnosis of lung nodules. These predictors may help build a model for lung nodule evaluation and surveillance. Prospective database of subjects meeting all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study. 1. Evidence of lung nodule on chest radiograph or Computed Tomography regardless of underlying aetiology 2. Age ³ 21 years old 3. Ability to provide informed consent This study will collect existing or prospective data that is part of standard clinical care from the electronic medical record of patients (ambulatory and inpatient from May 2018-2023.
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate a technology-based intervention, Caregiver Oncology Needs Evaluation Tool (CONNECT), which may increase lung cancer caregivers' knowledge about the benefits of supportive care resources, identify their unmet needs, and connect them with supportive care resources. The investigators will also determine their ability to recruit and keep patients and caregivers in the study.
Aim: To develop and testing a home exercise program for lung cancer survivors to improve their exercise tolerance and quality of life during the rehabilitation phase. Design: An experimental design will be used in the study. The 90 lung cancer survivors, who were diagnosed with lung cancer within one year and have completed their initial cancer treatment, will be recruited and randomized to the control or intervention group. After pre-test, the intervention participants will receive a 60 minutes of teaching regarding the home rehabilitation exercise program, with a printed exercise manual. The intervention participant will also receive a weekly phone call from the interventionist to enhance their exercise adherence and helping to overcome exercise barriers. The similar outcome measures as study one will be assessed on the baseline, 1th month, 3th month, and 6th month. Measurements: The study outcomes will be evaluated by three physical measures, six-minute walk test, Modified Borg Scale, 30-second Chair Sit-to-Stand Test, and 30-second Chair Sit-to-Stand Test, as well as a study questionnaire including Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) and FACIT-Fatigue. For study one the following data will be collected from the patient'schart: post-operative pulmonary complications, days of chest tube insertion, and days of hospitalization. Data analysis: Descriptive analysis will be used to describe patients'demongraphics, disease variables, and outcome variables. The Chi-square, T-test, and General Linear Mix-effect Model will be used to test the efficacy of the study interventions.
This is an open-label, single center, non-randomized, phase Ib trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of TQB2450 injection combined with anlotinib in patients with advanced mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been recently shown to result in a significant reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality. However, the utility of LDCT screening in developing countries with high incidence of tuberculosis has not been adequately studied. The investigators hypothesize that LDCT screening in tuberculosis endemic regions is likely to yield a large proportion of false-positive results, especially in the initial round of screening, posing a significant burden on the healthcare system. Herein, the investigators assess the utility of LDCT and its cost-effectiveness in India.
The obstruction of the central airways (CAO) may be caused by a large variety of malignant and non malignant processes, and it may present with a variety of symptoms ranging from mild shortness of breath to life-threatening respiratory failure. The epidemiologic impact of lung cancer leads to an increasing number of patients developing complications of proximal endobronchial disease. An estimated 20-30% of patients with lung cancer will develop complications associated with airway obstruction, e.g. dyspnea, pneumonia and atelectasis, and up to 40% of lung cancer deaths may be attributed to locoregional disease. Although lung cancer patients with CAO are not candidates for surgical resection, more than 80% of these patients can receive palliative treatment using interventional bronchoscopy; in addiction, almost the 85% of these procedures reach luminal clearance and endoscopic success in terms of symptomatic relief, of pulmonary function and quality of life. There are no definitive data about factors such as type of disease or site of the lesion which may affect the use of a single or a combined endoscopic modality or stenting in the treatment of airway obstructions. A Dalar's retrospective study showed that airway stenting is a useful treatment modality besides the other interventional bronchoscopic procedures: it not only provides rapid relief of symptoms and an improved quality of life, but also gives additional time for adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy that might provide prolonged survival. Since Dumon introduced the first dedicated endoluminal airway stent, there was a clear immediate relief of respiratory symptoms and significant quality survival in most patients (9). In a Miyazawa's study all patients with malignant central airway obstruction had significant improvements in dyspnea and also in spirometry after stenting, and the author suggested that the correct positioning of the stent at the choke point leads to maximal symptomatic benefit in these patients. The choice of different airway stents can be made based on the nature (intrinsic, extrinsic or combined) and site of the lesion: for example the Dumon stent can be preferred in lesions of trachea and right main bronchus, the Ultraflex stent on the left and stenosis beyond the main bronchi. The underlying disease, the site of lesion and treatment modality are known as independent predictors of survival. Complications related to the placement of stents include re-obstructions of the lumen by tumor, granuloma formation at the stent side, mucous plugging and migration of the stent; with the use of laser, both perforation of airway wall and fire. Regarding laser resection for malignant airway obstruction, it is associated with improved survival rates (60% of patients alive at 7 months in one study). As these studies were not randomized trials, it is impossible to conclude that the laser therapy was responsible for the improved survival, but it is likely that laser therapy provided a rapid and safe means of relieving central airway obstruction, which is associated with a high mortality rate. The strategy and modality of treatment for malignant central airway obstructions depends not only on the endoscopic characteristics and location of the lesions, but also on the patient's comorbidities, pulmonary function, previous treatment and life expectancy. The primary purpose of treatment with interventional bronchoscopy alone remains to improve symptom control and quality of life, not to improve the prognosis. However, the advent of molecular-targeted therapy may change the impact of interventional bronchoscopy, especially in lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: in a Tomoyuki case report there is the first description of the use of endoscopic treatment plus molecular-targeted therapy as combination treatment, with benefits in terms of patient's general conditions and quality of life. Moreover, some researchers have reported cases of malignant lymphoma patients with central airway obstruction who were successfully treated using interventional bronchoscopy followed by systemic chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences between patients with central malignant airway obstruction treated only with medical therapy versus patients submitted to endoscopic plus medical therapy in terms of prognosis, quality of life and access to health services.
The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is a new interfascial regional anesthesia technique recently described by Forero et al. Currently the literature shows the ESP block being used for analgesia after thoracic surgery, breast surgery, abdominal surgery (visceral abdominal analgesia in bariatric surgery, ventral hernia repair, cholecystectomy), thoracic vertebral surgery and for pain relief in rib fractures. Taking in consideration the excellent clinical experience, but the lack of strong and high-quality evidence, supporting the use of ESP block for pain management in patients undergoing VATS procedures, there is a specific interest to develop a prospective study. Comparing the effect of the current pain relief strategy at the MGH (intercostal nerve block by the surgeon at the end of the procedure ) versus ESP block after VATS, seems warranted to improve current clinical results.
Thoracic procedures are routinely performed under general anesthesia (GA), with one lung ventilation (OLV)by double lumen tube or (GA) in spontaneously breathing patient by TIVA or LMA are usually combined with thoracic epidural analgesia. However, GA whether mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing may have adverse effects including peri-intubation hypoxia, trauma to the upper airway, mechanical ventilation-induced injuries, impaired cardiac performance, neuromuscular problems in OLV and increased risk of pneumonia, and release of proinflammatory mediators in generally. Recently, awake thoracic epidural anesthesia (ATEA) has been used alone in thoracic procedures The results achieved in early studies have been encouraging. ATEA may eventually provide an alternative method to GA for thoracic procedures that would not only eliminate the need for GA but also facilitate both surgical reconstruction and eventually patient recovery. Recent studies suggested better clinical outcomes with ATEA, including less intraoperative bleeding, a better control of postoperative pain, early mobilization and short hospital stay, oral intake tolerance, reduction of surgical stress response, reduction of intraoperative cardiac events, improvement of myocardial flow determinants and left ventricular function, and a reduction of complications including pulmonary, thrombotic and infectious events.
The goal of this prospective, multi-center, single-arm, clinical study is to evaluate the clinical utility and performance of the FDA-cleared Ion™ Endoluminal System ("Ion") for bronchoscopically approaching and facilitating the tissue sampling of pulmonary nodules.
The risk of thromboembolism is elevated in lung cancer patients. The present project investigates whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) further increases the risk of thromboembolic disease in lung cancer patients. If coagulation is activated by SBRT, this study could form the basis of new clinical trials investigating whether lung cancer patients may benefit from thromboprophylaxis during and after stereotactic body radiation therapy.