Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00390806
Other study ID # HYT105962
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received October 19, 2006
Last updated December 5, 2013
Start date December 2006
Est. completion date September 2013

Study information

Verified date December 2013
Source GlaxoSmithKline
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Slovakia: State Institute for Drug ControlPoland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal ProductsPoland:Hungary: National Institute of PharmacyRussia: Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCanada: Health CanadaUnited States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The current prognosis for patients with metastatic brain cancer from NSCLC is very poor. The current standard treatment for this disease is radiation therapy to the brain. The goal of the current study is to test whether the combination of orally administered HYCAMTIN capsules and whole brain radiation therapy will prolong the survival time of patients with this potentially serious condition.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 472
Est. completion date September 2013
Est. primary completion date July 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion criteria:

- At least one measurable cancerous lesion in the brain from primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

- Must have received previous chemotherapy

- Must be 18 years of age of greater

- Must be Easter Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0, 1, 2

- At least 2 weeks must have elapsed since any surgery

- At least 4 weeks must have elapsed since any radiation to a non-CNS site

- Must have adequate bone marrow, renal, and live capacities

- Women must be of non-childbearing potential or practice adequate birth control

- Males must practice adequate methods of birth control

- Must sign written informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

- Previous whole brain radiation therapy

- Prior treatment with topotecan

- Investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-live

- Concomitant therapy with inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) or P-glycoprotein such as erlotinib or gefitinib

- Primary or secondary immunodeficiencies

- Gastrointestinal conditions that affect GI absorption or motility

- Uncontrolled emesis

- Brain metastasis at time of initial diagnosis of NSCLC

- History of other malignancy except in situ carcinoma of cervix; nonmelanomatous skin cancer, low grade prostate cancer

- Pregnant or intending to become pregnant or intending to father a baby

- Any severe concurrent medical condition that could affect compliance.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Drug:
HYCAMTIN, oral capsules
topotecan oral capsules 1.1 mg/m2
Radiation:
Radiation
Whole brain radiation

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada GSK Investigational Site Greenfield Park Quebec
Canada GSK Investigational Site Hamilton Ontario
Canada GSK Investigational Site Kingston Ontario
Canada GSK Investigational Site London Ontario
Canada GSK Investigational Site Moncton New Brunswick
Canada GSK Investigational Site Montreal Quebec
Canada GSK Investigational Site Montreal Quebec
Canada GSK Investigational Site Quebec
Canada GSK Investigational Site Sherbrooke Quebec
Canada GSK Investigational Site Toronto Ontario
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Budapest
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Csorna
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Gyor
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Gyula
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Mátraháza
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Miskolc
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Nyíregyháza
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Pécs
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Székesfehérvár
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Szombathely
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Törökbálint
Hungary GSK Investigational Site Zalaegerszeg-Pozva
Poland GSK Investigational Site Bialystok
Poland GSK Investigational Site Bydgoszcz
Poland GSK Investigational Site Gdansk
Poland GSK Investigational Site Krakow
Poland GSK Investigational Site Olsztyn
Poland GSK Investigational Site Olsztyn
Poland GSK Investigational Site Poznan
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Kazan
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Moscow
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Moscow
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Moscow
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Moscow
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Obninsk
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Orenburg
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site St-Petersburg
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site St. Petersburg
Russian Federation GSK Investigational Site Voronezh
Slovakia GSK Investigational Site Banska Bystrica
Slovakia GSK Investigational Site Bratislava
Slovakia GSK Investigational Site Nitra
United States GSK Investigational Site Albany New York
United States GSK Investigational Site Albuquerque New Mexico
United States GSK Investigational Site Anaheim California
United States GSK Investigational Site Aurora Colorado
United States GSK Investigational Site Bedford Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Birmingham Alabama
United States GSK Investigational Site Bronx New York
United States GSK Investigational Site Buffalo New York
United States GSK Investigational Site Buffalo New York
United States GSK Investigational Site Charleston South Carolina
United States GSK Investigational Site Chicago Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Columbia Missouri
United States GSK Investigational Site Columbus Ohio
United States GSK Investigational Site Corpus Christi Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Dallas Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Duarte California
United States GSK Investigational Site Duncanville Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Elk Grove Village Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Eugene Oregon
United States GSK Investigational Site Everett Washington
United States GSK Investigational Site Fort Worth Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Galesburg Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Glendale Arizona
United States GSK Investigational Site Hot Springs Arkansas
United States GSK Investigational Site Indianapolis Indiana
United States GSK Investigational Site Jackson Mississippi
United States GSK Investigational Site Kansas City Missouri
United States GSK Investigational Site Lakeland Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada
United States GSK Investigational Site Las Vegas Nevada
United States GSK Investigational Site Lincoln Nebraska
United States GSK Investigational Site Lubbock Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Madison Wisconsin
United States GSK Investigational Site Metairie Louisiana
United States GSK Investigational Site Minneapolis Minnesota
United States GSK Investigational Site Paducah Kentucky
United States GSK Investigational Site Park Ridge Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Pleasant Hill California
United States GSK Investigational Site Rockford Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Sherman Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Skokie Illinois
United States GSK Investigational Site Sugarland Texas
United States GSK Investigational Site Tampa Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Tampa Florida
United States GSK Investigational Site Vancouver Washington
United States GSK Investigational Site Westwood Kansas

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada,  Hungary,  Poland,  Russian Federation,  Slovakia, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Overall Survival Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until the date of death due to any cause. The date of last contact was used for those participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up. These participants were classified as having been censored. From the time of Randomization until the date of death due to any cause (up to 195 weeks) No
Secondary Six-month Survival Six-month survival is defined as the percentage of participants alive at 6 months following randomization. The date of last contact was used for those participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up. These participants were classified as having been censored. Month 6 No
Secondary Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or a Partial Response (PR) (Central Nervous System [CNS]-Radiologic) The number of participants achieving either a CR or PR, per World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria, in the CNS was assessed. CR is defined as the complete disappearance of all known measurable (Must be accurately measured in >=1 dimension) and nonmeasurable disease, without clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of recurrence for at least 4 weeks. CR may have been defined in participants with measurable and/or non-measurable disease at Screening. PR is defined as at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest length and perpendicular width of all measurable disease with no clear increase in nonmeasurable disease in participants without measurable disease. In both cases, there must have been no appearance of new disease, and no clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of disease progression for at least 4 weeks. Assessment of response was performed by the investigator and was based on unconfirmed responses. From the time of Randomization until the time of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks) No
Secondary Time to Response (TTR) (CNS-radiologic) TTR is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented evidence of CR or PR in the CNS. CR is defined as the complete disappearance of all known measurable (Must be accurately measured in >=1 dimension) and nonmeasurable disease, without clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of recurrence for at least 4 weeks. CR may have been defined in participants with measurable and/or non-measurable disease at Screening. PR is defined as at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest length and perpendicular width of all measurable disease with no clear increase in nonmeasurable disease in participants without measurable disease. In both cases, there must have been no appearance of new disease, and no clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of disease progression for at least 4 weeks. Assessment of response was performed by the investigator and was based on unconfirmed responses. From the time of Randomization until the first documented evidence of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks) No
Secondary Time to Progression (TTP) (CNS-radiologic) TTP is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression in the CNS. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. TTP was analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before a TTP event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants. From the time of Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression (up to 75 weeks) No
Secondary Time to Progression (TTP) (All Sites of Disease-radiologic) TTP is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression in all sites of disease. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. TTP was analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before a TTP event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants. From the time of Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression (up to 75 weeks) No
Secondary Number of Participants Who Ranked Each Individual Indicated Neurological Sign and Symptom as None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe at Months 1 and 3 Neurological signs and symptoms data were derived from a participant-reported diary. The participants were asked to assess the following signs and symptoms on a scale of none, mild, moderate, or severe at Months 1 and 3: headache, problems with balance/coordination (PB/C), leg weakness, arm weakness, loss of feeling/numbness (LofF/N), speech difficulty (SD), confusion, loss of memory (LofM), drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, visual problems (VP), seizures, leg/ankle swelling (L/AS), heart burn, difficulty sleeping (DS), tiredness, and appetite/weight gain (A/WG). Months 1 and 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Level of Consciousness at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants for the neurological sign and symptom of level of consciousness and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; somnolence or sedation not interfering with function (not intefering); somnolence or sedation interfering with function, but not activities of daily living (ADLs) (interfering); obtundation or stupor, difficult to arouse, inteferring with ADLs (obtundation or stupor); coma. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Headache at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], version 3.0) assessed participants for headache and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, Grade (G) 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Dizziness/Lightheadedness at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for dizziness/lightheadedness and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Vertigo at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for vertigo and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Nausea/Vomiting at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for nausea/vomiting and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Visual Problem at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for visual problem and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Seizure at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for seizure and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Other Neurological Symptoms at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for other neurological symptoms and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Cranial Nerves II-XII at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of cranial nerves II-XII and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; present, not interfering with ADLs; present, interfering with ADLs; life threatening, disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Language (Dysphasia or Aphasia) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of language (dysphasia or aphasia) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent; awareness of receptive or expressive aphasia, not impairing ability to communicate (not impaired); receptive or expressive dysphasia, impairing ability to communicate (impaired); inability to communicate (unable). Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Right Upper Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (right upper extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Left Upper Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (left upper extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Right Lower Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (right lower extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Left Lower Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (left lower extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Sensation at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of sensation and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; loss of deep tendon reflexes or paresthesia, but not interfering with function (not interfering with function); objective sensory loss or paresthesia interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs (interfering with function); sensory loss or paresthesia interfering with ADLs (intefering with ADLs); permanent sensory loss that interferes with function (permanent sensory loss). Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Right Upper Extremity: Finger to Nose Testing) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (right upper extremity: finger to nose testing) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Left Upper Extremity: Finger to Nose Testing) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (left upper extremity: finger to nose testing) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Gait) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (gait) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Balance) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (balance) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling. Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE; Both Serious and Non-serious) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. For a list of all SAEs and AEs, see the SAE/AE module of this results summary. From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks) No
Secondary Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Chemistry Parameters With Respect to the Normal Range The worst-case change from Baseline in chemistry parameters was measured as decrease to low (DTL), change to normal or no change (CTN/NC), or increase to high (ITH). The worst-case change value could have been measured at any point during the on-therapy period. Participants are counted twice if the participant "Decreased to Low" and "Increased to High" during the on-therapy period. From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks) No
Secondary Lesion Assessment and Measurement Lesions were assessed per WHO criteria. For lesion assessment data, see the outcome measure entitled "Number of participants with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) (central nervous system [CNS]-radiologic)." From the time of Randomization until the time of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks) No
Secondary Brain Symptoms Brain symptoms were assessed as the number of participants with neurological signs and symptoms. For brain symptom data, see the outcome measures entitled "Number of participants with the indicated investigator assessment for the neurological sign and symptom of X at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3." Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 No
Secondary Number of Participants Who Died or Progressed Disease-related events were measured as the number of participants who died or progressed. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. Data were analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before an event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants. From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks) No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05598528 - Exploring the Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Third-generation EGFR-TKIs as First-line Treatment in EGFR-positive Advanced NSCLC (PRECISE Study)
Completed NCT03836469 - Retrospective Epidemiological Study of Locally Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Brazil
Completed NCT01772225 - NSCLC Burden of Illness Study N/A
Completed NCT01362296 - An Open-label Study of GSK1120212 Compared With Docetaxel in Stage IV KRAS-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT01460472 - Immunotherapy With Racotumomab in Advanced Lung Cancer Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03803137 - Volatil Organic Compounds in Exhaled Air and Sweat After Thoracic Surgery for Carcinological Resection N/A
Completed NCT00528281 - A Phase II Trial of Lapatinib (TYKERB) + Pemetrexed (ALIMTA) in Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer With an Initial Dose Finding Phase Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT04592666 - Almonertinib/Pemetrexed/Carboplatin in EGFR T790M+ Advanced Lung Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT00480025 - GSK1572932A Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05784142 - Chemo-immunotherapy Induction Followed by Hypo-radiotherapy in LA-NSCLC(CHIC) Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04475939 - Placebo-controlled Study Comparing Niraparib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab as Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT01938456 - Safety and Tolerability of Trametinib in Combination With Docetaxel in Japanese Subjects With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 1
Terminated NCT04069936 - Marrow Infiltrating Lymphocytes - Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MILs™ - NSCLC) Alone or in Combination With Nivolumab With or Without Tadalafil in Locally Advanced and Unresectable or Metastatic NSCLC Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05565378 - A Platform Study of Novel Immunotherapy Combinations in Participants With Previously Untreated, Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04986670 - NutriCare Plus a Medically Tailored Meal Intervention Among Patients With Lung Cancer N/A
Completed NCT00367679 - Pazopanib As Pre-Surgical Therapy In Treatment-Naive Subjects With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT00073008 - A Study Of Oral GW572016 In Advanced Or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04581824 - Efficacy Comparison of Dostarlimab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Participants With Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Phase 2
Completed NCT00619424 - A Phase I Study Of Pazopanib With Either Erlotinib Or Pemetrexed In Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04940936 - Shared Decision Making on Radiation Dose for Lung Malignancies N/A