Lumbar Spine Fusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Sagittal Parameters After Mono Segmental Lumber Fusion: Interbody Versus Postrolateral Fusion
NCT number | NCT03877341 |
Other study ID # | 17100676 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | April 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date | March 1, 2023 |
Verified date | September 2023 |
Source | Assiut University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To compare postoperative radiographic sagittal parameters after monosegmental lumbar fusion: posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus postrolateral fusion in treatment of lumbar spine instability
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 42 |
Est. completion date | March 1, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patient older of 18 years old. - Patients with lytic spondylolisthesis - Low grade spondylolisthsis 1,2 Exclusion Criteria: - Traumatic spondylolysis - Previous spine surgery. - Patient younger 18 years old - High grade spondylolisthsis 3,4,5 - multiple levels spondylolithises |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Assiut University Hospitals | Assiut |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Assiut University |
Egypt,
CLOWARD RB. The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg. 1953 Mar;10(2):154-68. doi: 10.3171/jns.1953.10.2.0154. No abstract available. — View Citation
Cole CD, McCall TD, Schmidt MH, Dailey AT. Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009 Jun;2(2):118-26. doi: 10.1007/s12178-009-9053-8. Epub 2009 Apr 29. — View Citation
Feffer HL, Wiesel SW, Cuckler JM, Rothman RH. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. To fuse or not to fuse. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 Apr;10(3):287-9. — View Citation
Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jul;73(6):802-8. — View Citation
Hu SS, Tribus CB, Diab M, Ghanayem AJ. Spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):656-71. No abstract available. — View Citation
Kuraishi S, Takahashi J, Mukaiyama K, Shimizu M, Ikegami S, Futatsugi T, Hirabayashi H, Ogihara N, Hashidate H, Tateiwa Y, Kinoshita H, Kato H. Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Results of Posterolateral Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of L4 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J. 2016 Feb;10(1):143-52. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.143. Epub 2016 Feb 16. — View Citation
Lidar Z, Beaumont A, Lifshutz J, Maiman DJ. Clinical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion. Surg Neurol. 2005 Oct;64(4):303-8; discussion 308. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.03.025. — View Citation
Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 15;27(14):1536-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00011. — View Citation
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Spino sacral angle | Which is the angle fromed between the line from front side of t1 to the middle of sacrum and the line passing through the sacral plateau | 6month post op | |
Secondary | T1 pelvic angle | The angle between the line from centroid of t1 to the femoral head axis and the line from femoral head axis to middle of the s1 end plate | Pre op. Post op immediately. 6month post op | |
Secondary | Pelvic incidence | Is the angle between the line perpendicular to the s1 end plate from the midpoint of the end plate and the connecting line from the midpoint of the s1 end plate to center of the femoral head | Pre op. Post op immediately. 6month post op | |
Secondary | Pelvic tilt | Is the angle between the connecting line from the midpoint of the s1 end plate to the center of the femoral head and the vertical line | Pre op. Post op immediately. 6month post op | |
Secondary | Sacral slope | Is the angle between the tangent and the horizontal line of s1 end plate | Pre op. Post op immediately. 6month post op | |
Secondary | Lumbar lordosis | Is the junction of the thoracic kyphosis to the s1 end plate | Pre op. Post op immediately. 6month post op |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT01986946 -
Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusions
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02615483 -
Lumbar Spinal Fusion - Web-based Platform Targeting Anxiety and Depression
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03349580 -
Early Initiation of a Strength Training Based Rehabilitation After Lumbar Spine Fusion Improves Core Muscle Strength
|
N/A |