View clinical trials related to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to establish a relationship between the degree of radiologically established anatomical stenosis and the severity of self-assessed outcome measures in patients that have undergone and MRI.
This is a single-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes with MILD® devices versus epidural steroid injection in patients with symptomatic moderate to severe central canal spinal stenosis.
Overall Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of an interventional walking program on the quality of life and functional status of patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, post-surgery, using subjective (VAS, ODI, RMDQ, SF-36), and objective measures (triaxial accelerometry, step count, weight). Design and Methods: Two groups of subjects will be examined; patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) that progress to surgical management, with one group of subjects staring on the walking program at 2 months postop, and the other group starting on the walking program at 3 months postop. Subjects who agree to participate will be assessed (assessments listed below) after the diagnosis preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively. One half of the group will start the walking program at the 2 months postop visit and be assessed again at the end of the walking program, the other half will be assessed again at 3 months postop and start the walking program at that time and be assessed again at 4 months postop. All subjects will be contacted by phone during their walking program to allow for questions from the subjects and to offer support and encouragement. Subjects will be given instructions and a daily diary to track steps taken each day (appendix A). Subjects will be recruited from the referrals to the practices of the Orthopedic and Neurosurgery Spine Surgeons at the Health Sciences Centre in Winnipeg. This encompasses the majority of new and currently managed cases in the Manitoba and Northwestern Ontario. Subjects will be between the ages of 18 and 90. Male and female subjects will be recruited into the study. All LSS patients will demonstrate intractable neurogenic claudication and radiographically confirmed lumbar spinal stenosis. Exclusion criteria will be any previous lumbar spine surgery, the existence of significant co-morbidity (e.g. neurologic or cardiac condition, disease, etc.) of any form, and any other physical limitations (musculoskeletal injury) preventing the subject from participating in regular activity and the walking program. Subjects participating will be required to speak English.
This is a multi-center, prospective, clinical study to assess the clinical application and outcomes of MILD® Interlaminar Decompression in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent and disabling condition in the rapidly growing aging population. People with LSS often have a substantial physical and psychosocial burden as well as significant healthcare costs affecting both the individual and society. It has been reported that patients with LSS over the age of 65 are more likely to undergo spinal surgery than any other condition with an estimated total annual inpatient expense of one billion. Individuals undergoing surgical treatment for LSS tend to be older, therefore operative morbidity and mortality are a particular concern. Functional benefit derived from conservative treatment may increase the health and quality of life for individuals suffering from LSS and avoid or delay the need for surgery in some subjects. As the population continues to age, identifying effective non-surgical treatment options for older patients with LSS is an important research priority. Ultimately, the information gained from this study will help fill a significant void in medical literature regarding non-surgical options for this patient population.
This is a single-center, open label, prospective clinical study to assess the clinical application and functional outcomes of symptomatic patients undergoing the Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (MILD™) treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. In this study, patient-reported outcomes over a 3 month period following treatment will be collected by the investigator. Periodic surveys for each study subject's pain, functional status, quality of life and physical examination will track outcomes following MILD™ treatment.
The study is a prospective outcome study to evaluate the effectiveness and treatment outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy (MEDL) with objective evaluation tools. The patients who fulfill the selection criteria will be enrolled to collect the pre-operative clinical data including demographic data, image studies, and functional evaluation for neurological symptoms and disability. The patient will receive MEDL and post-operative follow-up will be arranged at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after the operation. All the collected data will be analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and treatment results of MEDL.
The proposed prospective, multi-center, randomized clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Superion™ ISS compared to the X-STOP® IPD® device in healthy adults suffering from at least 6 months of moderate spinal stenosis symptoms who have been unresponsive to conservative care.
The primary objective of the proposed pilot study is to determine the efficacy of pregabalin in prolonging the time to onset of pain and reducing the severity of pain associated with walking in patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication. The secondary objective is to examine the functional benefit of pregabalin with respect to improvement in duration and distance of walking tolerance. The proposed study will also provide the foundation for a treadmill-based methodology for assessing the analgesic efficacy of drugs for low back pain provoked by standing and walking associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.
To determine if the effectiveness of the X-STOP® implant is equivalent (non-inferior) to that of conventional laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis as measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire.