Lumbar Herniated Disc Clinical Trial
Official title:
US-MR Image Fusion-guided Versus Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Comparative Cohort Study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of US-MR image fusion-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | January 1, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | January 1, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. persistent radicular pain. 2. an imaging study (MRI or CT) showing LDH at a level and side corresponding to the patient 3. single responsible segment of lumbar disc herniation 4. L4-5 segment Exclusion Criteria: 1. Cauda equina syndrome or progressive neurologic deficit requiring urgent surgical intervention 2. Combination with other spinal disorder requiring advanced surgery (such as lumbar stenosis, spondylolisthesis, deformity, fracture, infection, tumor and so on) 3. Equal to or more than two responsible level 4. Previous spinal surgery 5. unable to collaborate during surgery 6. far-lateral disc herniation |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University | Guangzhou | Guangdong |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | radiation exposure | dose of radiation exposure | during operation | |
Secondary | puncture accuracy | the accuracy of puncture position confirmed by fluoroscopy. | during operation | |
Secondary | puncture satisfaction of surgeon | use Visual Analog Scales (VAS,scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more satisfactory) to evaluate the satisfaction of surgeon during puncture | during operation | |
Secondary | comfort of patient | use Visual Analog Scales (VAS,scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more comfortable) to evaluate the comfort of patient during puncture | during operation | |
Secondary | degree of pain | Visual Analog Scales (VAS, scores ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain) | preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation | |
Secondary | degree of disability | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more disability related to pain) | preoperation, immediately postoperation, 1 week postoperation | |
Secondary | puncture time | the time from the begin of puncture to the confirmation of optimal puncture | during operation |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01997086 -
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy vs Microendoscopic Discectomy for Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03282695 -
Ozone Therapy in Patients on Waiting List for Surgery Due to Disc Herniation: Prospective, Post-authorization Study
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT00927056 -
Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Microdiscectomy Versus Conventional Open Microdiscectomy For Lumbar Herniated Disc
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02414698 -
Percutaneous HydroDiscectomy Compared to TESI for Radiculopathy
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00566007 -
The Effect of Ozone Therapy for Lumbar Herniated Disc
|
Phase 2 |