View clinical trials related to Lumbar Disc Herniation.
Filter by:To determine the effects of WB-EMS application on balance, pain, muscle strength, muscle endurance, flexibility, muscle shortening and quality of life in individuals with Lumbar Disc Hernia and compare it with individuals who have not received this training.
Bilateral sacroiliac joint injection in symptomatic lumbar disc prolapse under ultrasound guidance and studying the effect of this technique on pain, spine mobility and activity of daily living.
In a study that was approved nine years ago (EK-22/2009) we could show (i) that spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a very effective and safe treatment for acute and chronic lumbar disc herniation (LDH); (ii) that SMT is as effective and less expensive than lumbar nerve root injections and (iii) that the recurrence rate up to one year was very low in acute and in chronic LDH patients. However, the long-term outcome of this conservatively treated LDH patients is unknown. Thus, the objective of this amendment is to investigate the proportion of long-term recurrences in these patients who were treated with SMT for their LDH and to compare these results with already existing data from other treatments, e.g. surgery. This is important information to know whether this conservative method is a sustainable approach for treating LDH.
Intra-operative blood loss is an important attribution and predictor of the lumbar spine surgery and patient outcome. Stripping the muscle off bone makes more exposed bleeding spine surface is one of causes for blood loss during lumbar surgeries. The importance to decrease the bleeding is to improve the surgical field visibility which provides technical ease for surgeon and decreases the surgical time besides maintaining the hemodynamic stability. In past, there were many trials to minimize surgical blood loss by different drugs such as Na Nitroprusside, magnesium sulfate, volatile anesthetics and beta-adrenergic antagonist.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation between pattern of gait and pelvic displacement in patients with lumbar disc herniation.
Transforaminal epidural injection of treatments, commonly steroids (TFESI), is offered to people with sciatica and might improve symptoms, reduce disability and speed up return to normal activities (NICE guidelines) Imaging-guided TFESI has traditionally been performed in the sciatica context because injection is administered directly to the nerve root, which relieves the pain markedly; however, the maintenance time is usually short. Treatment with radiofrequency for pain management is in clinical use since decades primarily with nerve lesioning (thermoablation) once the specific pain tributary nerve is identified. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) with neuromodulation intention (not lesioning) has been shown to be effective in reducing some types of chronic pain, both degenerative and neuropathic. Pulsed radiofrequency has been also extensively used in the context of acute and subacute sciatica due to disc herniation without sufficient level of evidence. In a prospective RCT, comparing prf directed to dorsal root ganglia and Tfesi in patients with sciatica did not allow conclusions on efficacy because of limitations of the trial. In that trial, only few participants completed the study due to violation of trial protocol translating the results as not consistent. One retrospective trial, in which the use of Prf in addition to tfesi was evaluated in patients with acute and subacute sciatica, demonstrated rapid pain relief onset and prolonged maintenance; the overall efficacy was superior to that of the single method treatment (either tfsei or prf). The investigators conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (Pulsed Radiofrequency in Addition to Tfesi for Sciatica [PRATS]) to determine if PRF in addition to TFESI leads to better outcomes in the management of patients with acute and subacute sciatica due to disc herniation, compared to TFESI alone.
To determine the expected pain response timeline for patients receiving epidural steroid injections, our team plans to assess patient pain severity and degree of pain relief every 3 days for 23 days.
60 patients involved were divided into two matched groups; Group A: 30 patients were treated with conventional fenestration laminectomy and discectomy and Group B: 30 patients were treated with microdiscectomy. The age of the patients involved in this study ranged from 19 years old to 46 years old
Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasily due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and logissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under US guidance. Therefore, modified-TLIP (mTLIP) block was defined as a new approach. It has been reported that mTLIP block may provide effective analgesia management after lumbar spine surgery. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane block (ESPB) is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. It has been reported that ESPB provides lumbar analgesia at T10-12, L3. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided mTLIP block and ESPB pain management after lumbar discectomy+ surgery.
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of four physical therapy treatment approaches for lumbar region pathologies. Eighty volunteers who have back pain will be included in the study. Subjects will be randomly divided into four groups; Group 1: Soft tissue mobilisation techniques and stabilization exercises (n=20), Group 2: Kinesiotape and stabilization exercise (n=20), Group 3: Stabilization exercises (n=20), Group 4: Reflexology and stabilization exercises (n=20).