Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02511457
Other study ID # 201205760
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received July 24, 2015
Last updated October 24, 2016
Start date October 2012
Est. completion date August 2015

Study information

Verified date October 2016
Source University of Iowa
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Measurement of the cardiac output is one of the important hemodynamic monitoring tools in cardiac surgery. It helps determine the type of medications needed to maintain optimal hemodynamic status in the entire perioperative period. Thermodilution method using pulmonary artery catheter is considered has the gold standard for the measurement of cardiac output. Investigators would like to compare the most popular minimally-invasive devices used to measure cardiac output using arterial waveform: LiDCO Rapid and TEE with the thermodilution method at various phases of the cardiac surgery.


Description:

Measurement of the cardiac output is one of the important hemodynamic monitoring tools in cardiac surgery. It helps determine the type of medications needed to maintain optimal hemodynamic status in the entire perioperative period. Thermodilution method using pulmonary artery catheter is considered has the gold standard for the measurement of cardiac output, however over the past 10 to 15 years it has been questioned about its safety and efficacy. There has been a surge in recent years of less invasive devices capable of measuring cardiac output by various means, including bioimpedance, transpulmonary thermodilution, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and arterial waveform analysis.

There is a variety of devices currently available for cardiac output measurement by arterial-waveform analysis. These devices have been compared to each other, and to the pulmonary artery catheter as the gold standard. However, the companies manufacturing these devices have made software upgrades that they believe improves their performance. No studies have been performed comparing the uncalibrated arterial waveform based cardiac output measurement device,LiDCORapid since the software upgrades. In addition to baseline cardiac output measurements, Investigators intend to study the effect of volume loading (by trendelenburg position), sympathetic stimulus (incision), a vasodilated state (15 minutes after separation from CPB) and chest closure on cardiac output measured by the three different techniques.

In addition to cardiac output the investigators would like to measure stroke volume ,Systemic Vascular Resistance, stroke volume variation with LiDCO . The main purpose is to validate the accuracy of measurements by these two minimally-invasive methods in comparison with thermodilution method in various hemodynamic states.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 110
Est. completion date August 2015
Est. primary completion date August 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 30 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Elective cardiac procedures other than those specified in the exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- All emergency cardiac procedures, prisoners and pregnant women, patients who are scheduled for ventricular assist devices and those with severe aortic, mitral and tricuspid insufficiency will be excluded.

Study Design

Observational Model: Case-Only, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Iowa

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (2)

Cecconi M, Dawson D, Casaretti R, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. A prospective study of the accuracy and precision of continuous cardiac output monitoring devices as compared to intermittent thermodilution. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Dec;76(12):1010-7. Epub 2010 Jul — View Citation

Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R212. doi: 10.1186/cc9335. Epub 2010 Nov 23. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The primary objective of the study is measured cardiac output by LiDCO Rapid is as equivalent ( within 30%) as measured by pulmonary artery catheter using intermittent thermodilution method among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. During intraoperative period. No
Secondary The secondary objective of the study is measured cardiac output by TEE using VTI at LVOT is as equivalent ( within 30%) as measured by pulmonary artery catheter using intermittent thermodilution method among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. During intraoperative period No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT01157299 - Hemodynamic Evaluation of Preload Responsiveness in Children by Using PiCCO N/A
Completed NCT01857999 - Losartan in Decompensated Heart Failure Phase 4
Terminated NCT00524862 - Standard Drug Therapy vs. Implanted Defibrillator for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death N/A
Completed NCT00529490 - Efficacy, Safety of Hypertonic Lactate Soln. as Fluid Resuscitation Compared With Ringer's Lactate in Post-CABG Pats Phase 3
Completed NCT02433379 - Understanding Outcomes With the EMBLEMâ„¢ S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection Fraction N/A
Completed NCT00586027 - Is There a Correlation of Natriuretic Propeptide Type B With an Intraoperative Low Cardiac Output? N/A
Completed NCT00529711 - The Efficacy of Hypertonic Lactate Solution in CABG(Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT02599376 - Comparative Study of Haemodynamic Changes After Spinal Anaesthesia in Non-obese and Pregnant Women N/A
Completed NCT02529033 - Hemodynamic Survey Cardiac Surgical Scenarios
Withdrawn NCT00167440 - Comparison of Techniques for Assessing Cardiac Output and Preload in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT02422342 - Comparison Study of Non-invasive Measurement of Blood Pressure and Cardiac Output During Stress Echocardiography