Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05306119
Other study ID # 20213753
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 1, 2021
Est. completion date June 30, 2026

Study information

Verified date January 2022
Source Gomel State Medical University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

As a result, will be developed: a list of criteria for functional impairment in patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain; a list of criteria for disabilities in patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain; method of medical rehabilitation of patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain; and criteria for evaluating its effectiveness.


Description:

Aim: to improve the quality of medical rehabilitation of patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain by developing the method of medical rehabilitation with evaluating its effectiveness. Objectives: 1. To exam clinical and functional state assessment of patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain. 2. To analyze functional status of patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain, who were admitted for medical rehabilitation and determine a list of criteria of impaired functions and a list of criteria for life limitation in patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain. 3. To develop an algorithm for assessing patients' functional status after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain. 4. To analyze of the effect of different means and methods of rehabilitation in comorbid patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain: the degree of severity of pain syndrome, limitation of mobility, ability to self-care. 5. To develop the Draft Electronic Medical Rehabilitation Card of a patient (a medical rehabilitation card of a standard pattern). 6. Choose the most effective techniques of medical rehabilitation, determining the efficiency of performed of medical rehabilitation measures in patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain and form a list of medical rehabilitation measures in these patients. 7. To evaluate the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain and list of them. 8. To develop a method of medical rehabilitation of patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain. 9. Evaluate the effectiveness of the developed method of medical rehabilitation of patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain in the medium term (in the period of 6 months, 1 year after the end of rehabilitation). 10. To evaluate the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation of patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain and approve the developed indicators in order to evaluate the efficiency of medical rehabilitation in this group of patients. 11. To develop an instruction manual containing a method of medical rehabilitation in patients after myocardial revascularization combined with low back pain and criteria for assessing its effectiveness.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 120
Est. completion date June 30, 2026
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 40 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Patients After Myocardial Revascularization Combined With Low Back Pain of 40-60 years of age Exclusion Criteria: - Arterial hypertension - Heart attack - Atherosclerosis - Stroke - Coronary heart disease

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Rehabilitation method
Application of techniques of kinesiotherapy, electrotherapy, massage in comorbid patients and patients with low back pain who had undergone myocardial revascularization surgery in main group.

Locations

Country Name City State
Belarus Gomel State Medical University Gomel Province

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Gomel State Medical University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belarus, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Back pain Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Heartache Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Angina pectoris ECG. Reveal the signs of ischemia (deviation of ST segment). 21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Arrhythmia Holter monitor. Assessment of painless ischemia, heart rhythm disorders, silent ischemia. 21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Exercise tolerance Treadmill Exercise Stress Test. Assessment of exercise tolerance, coronary reserve. 21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Paresis Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Blood pressure level Systolic blood pressure and Diastolic blood pressure is measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Mobility Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Self-service Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Work capacity Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Back pain Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Heartache Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Angina pectoris ECG. ECG. Reveal the signs of ischemia (deviation of ST segment). 6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Arrhythmia Holter monitor. Assessment of painless ischemia, heart rhythm disorders, silent ischemia. 6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Exercise tolerance Treadmill Exercise Stress Test. Assessment of exercise tolerance, coronary reserve. 6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Paresis Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Blood pressure level Systolic blood pressure and Diastolic blood pressure is measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Mobility Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Self-service Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Work capacity Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Back pain Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Heartache Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Angina pectoris ECG. Reveal the signs of ischemia (deviation of ST segment). 1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Arrhythmia Holter monitor. Assessment of painless ischemia, heart rhythm disorders, silent ischemia. 1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Exercise tolerance Treadmill Exercise Stress Test. Assessment of exercise tolerance, coronary reserve. 1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Paresis Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Blood pressure level Systolic blood pressure and Diastolic blood pressure is measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Mobility Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Self-service Self-report according to the questionnaire Short Form Medical Outcomes Study SF-36. (SF-36, 1998), ranges from 0 to 100.
The Short Form (36) Health Survey is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. The SF-36 is a measure of health status and is commonly used as a variable in the quality-adjusted life year calculation to determine the cost-effectiveness of a health treatment.
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, mental health.
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Primary Work capacity Visual examination with a determination of a degree
The Oxford Scale
The most commonly accepted method of evaluating muscle strength is the Oxford Scale (AKA Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale). This method involves testing key muscles from the upper and lower extremities against the examiner's resistance and grading the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale accordingly:
Flicker of movement Through full range actively with gravity counterbalanced Through full range actively against gravity Through full range actively against some resistance Through full range actively against strong resistance
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Stroke SCORE 2 chart Risk assessment of cardiovascular accidents. A scale for assessing the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease within 10 years. Assessment is based on the age, sex, systolic pressure (mm.Hg), cholesterol level (mmol/l), smoking status.
Scores: < 1%, 1%, 2 %, 3-4 %, 5-9 %, 10-14 %, 15% and over.
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Acute myocardial infarction Increasing levels of cardiac specific biomarkers (CK-MB, Myoglobin, Troponin T and I), ECG, Echocardiography, SCORE 2021 chart, pain (self-report). 21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Death due to vascular diseases The Lown grading system for ventricular arrhythmias of high rank The Lown grading system is used in observational and experimental studies of ischaemic heart disease. This grading system uses three levels of ventricular premature depolarisation frequency and four complex features to assign patients to one of seven grades.
Assessment occurs depending on the number and type of extrasystoles according to Holter monitoring data.
Grades: 0, 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5.
21 days after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Stroke SCORE 2 chart Risk assessment of cardiovascular accidents. A scale for assessing the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease within 10 years. Assessment is based on the age, sex, systolic pressure (mm.Hg), cholesterol level (mmol/l), smoking status.
Scores: < 1%, 1%, 2 %, 3-4 %, 5-9 %, 10-14 %, 15% and over.
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Acute myocardial infarction Increasing levels of cardiac specific biomarkers (CK-MB, Myoglobin, Troponin T and I), ECG, Echocardiography, SCORE 2021 chart, pain (self-report). 6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Death due to vascular diseases The Lown grading system for ventricular arrhythmias of high rank The Lown grading system is used in observational and experimental studies of ischaemic heart disease. This grading system uses three levels of ventricular premature depolarisation frequency and four complex features to assign patients to one of seven grades.
Assessment occurs depending on the number and type of extrasystoles according to Holter monitoring data.
Grades: 0, 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5.
6 months after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Stroke SCORE 2 chart Risk assessment of cardiovascular accidents. A scale for assessing the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease within 10 years. Assessment is based on the age, sex, systolic pressure (mm.Hg), cholesterol level (mmol/l), smoking status.
Scores: < 1%, 1%, 2 %, 3-4 %, 5-9 %, 10-14 %, 15% and over.
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Acute myocardial infarction Increasing levels of cardiac specific biomarkers (CK-MB, Myoglobin, Troponin T and I), ECG, Echocardiography, SCORE 2021 chart, pain (self-report). 1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
Secondary Death due to vascular diseases The Lown grading system for ventricular arrhythmias of high rank The Lown grading system is used in observational and experimental studies of ischaemic heart disease. This grading system uses three levels of ventricular premature depolarisation frequency and four complex features to assign patients to one of seven grades.
Assessment occurs depending on the number and type of extrasystoles according to Holter monitoring data.
Grades: 0, 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5.
1 year after intervention of rehabilitation method
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03916705 - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility N/A
Completed NCT04007302 - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT03600207 - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04284982 - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05600543 - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain N/A
Withdrawn NCT05410366 - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed NCT03673436 - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed NCT02546466 - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT00983385 - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05156242 - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. N/A
Recruiting NCT04673773 - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain. N/A
Completed NCT06049251 - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises N/A
Completed NCT06049277 - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain N/A
Completed NCT04980469 - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle N/A
Completed NCT04055545 - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects N/A
Recruiting NCT05552248 - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Recruiting NCT05944354 - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Completed NCT05801588 - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life N/A
Completed NCT05811143 - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.