Position-Induced Opening of the Intervertebral Foramen is Efficient to

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Efficiency of the conservative mechanical lumbosacral nerve root decompression, as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment, in the case of acute lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Clinical Trial Description

Non-invasive Position-Induced Opening of the Intervertebral Foramen in sidelying position, as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment, was used in the case of acute lumbosacral radiculopathy.

20 examinees were split into two groups, 10 in the experimental and 10 in the control group. Experimental group was given positional opening of the intervert. foramen, together with pharmacological treatment - steroid antiinflammatory drug - dexamethasone, nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs and pain killers while control group was given just the same pharmacological treatment and recommended rest.

Measured dependent variables were:

1. Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) for the low back and radiculopathy, separately

2. Straight leg raise in supine position - nerve mobility test

3. EuroQol questionnaire - general health condition questionnaire

4. Oswestry questionnaire - activities of daily living (ADL) specific questionnaire for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathies Inclusive criteria were: Age between 20 - 60, lumbar disc herniation recognized by the MRI, lumbosacral radiculopathy with symptoms such as radicular pain, sensation dysfunctions or motor dysfunctions, recognized by electromyography (EMG) diagnostics.

Exclusive criteria: age more than 60, degenerative lumbar stenosis, spondylolisthesis, vertebra fractures, tumours.

Conclusion: Physiotherapy with a positional, mechanical decompression of the compressed lumbosacral nerve root, as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment, is proved to be efficient with the lumbosacral radiculopathy. It is recommended to be applied since the first day of a patient admittance in the hospital if there is a position that can reduce the pain. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04276519
Study type	Interventional
Source	General Hospital Sveti Duh
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	April 1, 2016
Completion date	July 1, 2016

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03916705` - Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility	N/A
Completed	`NCT04007302` - Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago	N/A
Completed	`NCT03273114` - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03600207` - The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04284982` - Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05600543` - Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT05410366` - Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
Completed	`NCT03673436` - Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
Completed	`NCT02546466` - Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT00983385` - Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05156242` - Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04673773` - MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049251` - ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises	N/A
Completed	`NCT06049277` - Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT04980469` - A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle	N/A
Completed	`NCT04055545` - High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05944354` - Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
Recruiting	`NCT05552248` - Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
Completed	`NCT05801588` - Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life	N/A
Completed	`NCT05811143` - Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Position-Induced Opening of the Intervertebral Foramen is Efficient to Treat an Acute Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Disc Herniation

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms