Low Back Pain Clinical Trial
— LOMBATHERMOfficial title:
Non-pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Back Pain: a Randomised, Controlled Trial
The working hypothesis is that spa therapy in addition to usual care including home exercises (UCHE) will result in greater improvements in pain reduction, associated disability and quality of life for chronic low back pain patients. It follows that health resource consumption and linked costs should also be reduced. The primary objective of this study is therefore to compare the therapeutic effect of UCHE alone versus spa therapy in addition to UCHE for chronic low back pain.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 358 |
Est. completion date | June 15, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | December 15, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patient presenting with chronic low back pain: usual pain of the lumbar region lasting for more than 3 months. This pain may radiate to the buttocks, iliac crest, and does not go past the knee. - Patient presenting with a current pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS) > or = 40 mm. - The patient has signed the informed consent - The patient is a beneficiary of a social security programme [national health insurance] Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with secondary low back pain - Patients with severe depression, psychosis - Patients who have already had a spa treatment in the previous 6 months - Patients with a contraindication for spa treatment - Patients with a professional activity related to hydrotherapy (to avoid any conflict of interest) - Patients with sciatic pain beyond the knee (sciatica being a non-indication for spa treatment) - Other treatments that may interact according to the judgment of the investigator - Patients who live more than 30 km away from the spa |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Centre de recherche rhumatologique et thermal | Aix-Les-Bains |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Association Francaise pour la Recherche Thermale |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Presence/absence of a clinically relevant change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain | Presence/absence of a clinically relevant change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, defined by an improvement of at least 30%; cases where patients demonstrate a 30% improvement in VAS scores for pain but nevertheless require hospitalisation for back pain during the study follow-up period will be considered as treatment failures (absence of clinically relevant change). | 6 months | |
Secondary | Huskinsson's VAS for pain. | Baseline (day 0) | ||
Secondary | Huskinsson's VAS for pain. | 1 month | ||
Secondary | Huskinsson's VAS for pain. | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Huskinsson's VAS for pain. | 12 months | ||
Secondary | The EIFEL scale | The EIFEL scale: the validated French version of a disability rating scale by Rolland and Morris. This 24-question scale (with scores ranging from 0 (no impact) to 24 (maximum impact) quantifies the impact of low back pain on daily life. | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | The EIFEL scale | The EIFEL scale: the validated French version of a disability rating scale by Rolland and Morris. This 24-question scale (with scores ranging from 0 (no impact) to 24 (maximum impact) quantifies the impact of low back pain on daily life. | 1 month | |
Secondary | The EIFEL scale | The EIFEL scale: the validated French version of a disability rating scale by Rolland and Morris. This 24-question scale (with scores ranging from 0 (no impact) to 24 (maximum impact) quantifies the impact of low back pain on daily life. | 6 months | |
Secondary | The EIFEL scale | The EIFEL scale: the validated French version of a disability rating scale by Rolland and Morris. This 24-question scale (with scores ranging from 0 (no impact) to 24 (maximum impact) quantifies the impact of low back pain on daily life. | 12 months | |
Secondary | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) assess inappropriate fears and beliefs concerning back pain; the validated French version will be used. | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) assess inappropriate fears and beliefs concerning back pain; the validated French version will be used. | 1 month | |
Secondary | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) assess inappropriate fears and beliefs concerning back pain; the validated French version will be used. | 6 months | |
Secondary | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) | The Fear Avoidance and Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) assess inappropriate fears and beliefs concerning back pain; the validated French version will be used. | 12 months | |
Secondary | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire will be used to track changes in quality of life. This self-administered questionnaire consists of two pages: the first contains the EQ-5D descriptive system and the second a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each described by five levels of intensity ("no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems or complete inability"). The respondent must indicate one intensity level for each dimension. | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire will be used to track changes in quality of life. This self-administered questionnaire consists of two pages: the first contains the EQ-5D descriptive system and the second a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each described by five levels of intensity ("no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems or complete inability"). The respondent must indicate one intensity level for each dimension. | 1 month | |
Secondary | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire will be used to track changes in quality of life. This self-administered questionnaire consists of two pages: the first contains the EQ-5D descriptive system and the second a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each described by five levels of intensity ("no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems or complete inability"). The respondent must indicate one intensity level for each dimension. | 6 months | |
Secondary | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire will be used to track changes in quality of life. This self-administered questionnaire consists of two pages: the first contains the EQ-5D descriptive system and the second a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each described by five levels of intensity ("no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems or complete inability"). The respondent must indicate one intensity level for each dimension. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS): Yes/no response to the following question: "If you take into account all the activities you have in your daily life, the importance of your pain and your disability, do you consider your condition as satisfactory?" | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS): Yes/no response to the following question: "If you take into account all the activities you have in your daily life, the importance of your pain and your disability, do you consider your condition as satisfactory?" | 1 month | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS): Yes/no response to the following question: "If you take into account all the activities you have in your daily life, the importance of your pain and your disability, do you consider your condition as satisfactory?" | 6 months | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS): Yes/no response to the following question: "If you take into account all the activities you have in your daily life, the importance of your pain and your disability, do you consider your condition as satisfactory?" | 12 months | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | 1 month | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the patient on his/her state of health (5-point Likert scale) | 12 months | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | 1 month | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | Overall opinion of the evaluating physician on the patient's state of health (5-point Likert scale) | 12 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics (in mg of paracetamol and morphine equivalents). | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics (in mg of paracetamol and morphine equivalents). | 1 month | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics (in mg of paracetamol and morphine equivalents). | 6 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Analgesics (in mg of paracetamol and morphine equivalents). | 12 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs (reported in mg and as a percentage of the maximum dose) | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs (reported in mg and as a percentage of the maximum dose) | 1 month | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs (reported in mg and as a percentage of the maximum dose) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: NSAIDs (reported in mg and as a percentage of the maximum dose) | 12 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids (in mg equivalent prednisone) | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids (in mg equivalent prednisone) | 1 month | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids (in mg equivalent prednisone) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Corticosteroids (in mg equivalent prednisone) | 12 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: % of maximum dose | Baseline (day 0) | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: % of maximum dose | 1 month | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: % of maximum dose | 6 months | |
Secondary | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: | Daily drug consumption over the past 72 hours: Benzodiazepine muscle relaxants: % of maximum dose | 12 months | |
Secondary | Number of infiltrations | 12 months | ||
Secondary | Estimated per-patient cost for one year of care | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03916705 -
Thoraco-Lumbar Fascia Mobility
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04007302 -
Modification of the Activity of the Prefrontal Cortex by Virtual Distraction in the Lumbago
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03600207 -
The Effect of Diaphragm Muscle Training on Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04284982 -
Periodized Resistance Training for Persistent Non-specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05600543 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Belt on Spinal Mobility in Subjects With and Without Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05410366 -
Safe Harbors in Emergency Medicine, Specific Aim 3
|
||
Completed |
NCT03673436 -
Effect of Lumbar Spinal Fusion Predicted by Physiotherapists
|
||
Completed |
NCT02546466 -
Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00983385 -
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05156242 -
Corticospinal and Motor Behavior Responses After Physical Therapy Intervention in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673773 -
MY RELIEF- Evidence Based Information to Support People Aged 55+ Years Living and Working With Persistent Low-back Pain.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049251 -
ELDOA Technique Versus Lumbar SNAGS With Motor Control Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06049277 -
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04980469 -
A Study to Explore the Effect of Vitex Negundo and Zingiber Officinale on Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Sedentary Lifestyle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055545 -
High Intensity Interval Training VS Moderate Intensity Continuous Training in Chronic Low Back Pain Subjects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05552248 -
Assessment of the Safety and Performance of a Lumbar Belt
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05944354 -
Wearable Spine Health System for Military Readiness
|
||
Completed |
NCT05801588 -
Participating in T'ai Chi to Reduce Back Pain and Improve Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05811143 -
Examining the Effects of Dorsal Column Stimulation on Pain From Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Related to Epidural Lipomatosis.
|